Towards coherent loop dominance analysis: Progress in eigenvalue elasticity analysis

System Dynamics Review

Volumn 22, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 263-289

  Güneralp, Burak ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EIGENVALUE; ELASTICITY; NUMERICAL MODEL;

EID: 33845321385     PISSN: 08837066     EISSN: 10991727     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/sdr.343     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. AbdelGawad A, Abdel-Aleem BA, Saleh MM, Davidsen P. 2005. Automated eigen-value analysis of system dynamics models. In Proceedings of the 2005 International System Dynamics Conference, Boston MA. System Dynamics Society: Albany, NY.
2. Davidsen P. 1991. The structure-behavior graph. The System Dynamics Group, MIT: Cambridge, MA.
3. Ford D. 1999. A behavioral approach to feedback loop dominance analysis. System Dynamics Review 15(1): 3-36.
4. Forrester N. 1982. A dynamic synthesis of basic macroeconomic theory: implications for stabilization policy analysis. PhD dissertation, MIT: Cambridge, MA.
5. Güneralp B. 2005. Progress in eigenvalue elasticity analysis as a coherent loop dominance analysis tool. In Proceedings of the 2005 International System Dynamics Conference, Boston, MA. System Dynamics Society: Albany, NY. https://netfiles.uiuc.edu/xythoswfs/webui/guneralp/ shared/EEA [20 April 2006].
6. Güneralp B. 2006a. Guide for the implementation of the EEA on the three test models. https://netfiles.uiuc.edu/xythoswfs/webui/guneralp/ shared/EEA [20 April 2006].
7. Güneralp B. 2006b. Exploring structure-behavior relations in nonlinear dynamic feedback models. PhD dissertation. University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, USA.
8. Kampmann C. 1996. Feedback loop gains and system behavior. In Proceedings of the 1996 International System Dynamics Conference, Boston, MA. System Dynamics Society: Albany, NY.
9. Kampmann C, Oliva R. 2005. Loop eigenvalue elasticity analysis: three case studies. In Proceedings of the 2005 International System Dynamics Conference, Boston, MA. System Dynamics Society: Albany, NY.
10. Mojtahedzadeh MT. 1997. A Path taken: computer assisted heuristics for understanding dynamic systems. PhD dissertation, University at Albany, SUNY: Albany, NY.
11. Mojtahedzadeh MT, Andersen DF, Richardson GP. 2004. Using Digest to implement the pathway participation method for detecting influential system structure. System Dynamics Review 20(1): 1-20.
12. Oliva R. 2004. Model structure analysis through graph theory: partition heuristics and feedback structure decomposition. System Dynamics Review 20(4): 313-336.
13. Oliva R, Mojtahedzadeh MT. 2004. Keep it simple: dominance assessment of short feedback loops. In Proceedings of the 2004 International System Dynamics Conference, Oxford, UK. System Dynamics Society: Albany, NY.
14. Phaff HWG. 2006. Investigating model analysis: a critical examination of current methods for model behavioural analysis in system dynamics. Masters thesis, Delft University of Technology, Delft, the Netherlands.
15. Richardson GP. 1995. Loop polarity, loop dominance, and the concept of dominant polarity. System Dynamics Review 11(1): 67-88.
16. Richardson GP. 1996. Problems for the future of system dynamics. System Dynamics Review 12(2):141-157.
17. Saleh MM. 2002. The characterization of model behavior and its causal foundation. PhD dissertation, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
18. Sterman JD. 1985. A behavioral model of the economic long wave. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 6: 17-53.