Soil Influences on the Mechanical Actions of a Flexible Spring Tine during Selective Weed Harrowing

Biosystems Engineering

Volumn 96, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 7-18

  Mouazen, A M ^a   Duerinckx, K ^a   Ramon, H ^a   Anthonis, J ^a  

^a Faculty of Bioscience Engineering   (Belgium)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CULTIVATION; MOISTURE; PLANTS (BOTANY); SOILS; STRAIN GAGES; WEED CONTROL;

SOIL AGGREGATE SIZE; SOIL BINS; SOIL PROPERTIES; VIBRATION FREQUENCY;

AGRICULTURAL MACHINERY;

CULTIVATION; HARROWING; MOISTURE CONTENT; PLANTS; SOIL; STRAIN GAGES; WEEDS;

EID: 33845319184     PISSN: 15375110     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2006.09.007     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Armstrong-Hélouvry B., Dupont P., and Canudas De Wit C. A survey of models, analysis tools and compensation methods for the control of machines with friction. Automica 30 7 (1994) 1083-1138
2. Barroso J., Fernandez-Quintanilla C., Maxwell B.D., and Rew L.J. Simulating the effects of weed spatial pattern and resolution of mapping and spraying on economics of site-specific management. Weed Research 44 1 (2005) 413-488
3. Dammer K.H., Schweigert T., and Wittmann C.H. Probability maps for risk asessment in a patchy weed control. Precision Agriculture 1 (1999) 185-198
4. Duerinckx K; Ramon H (2004). The response of different soils to changing settings of a flexible spring tine during weed harrowing. EurAgEng Paper No. 508, AgEng04 International Conference, Engineering the Future, Leuven, Belgium, cd rom.
5. Duerincx K., Mouazen A.M., Anthonis J., and Ramon H. Effects of spring tine settings and operational conditions on the mechanical performance of a weed harrow tine. Biosystems Engineering 91 1 (2005) 21-34 10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2005.02.2005
6. Gerhards R., and Christensen S. Real-time weed detection, decision making and patch spraying in maize, sugarbeet, winter wheat and winter barley. Weed Research 43 6 (2003) 385-392
7. Goudy H.J., Bennett K.A., Brown R.B., and Tardif F.J. Evaluation of site-specific weed management using a direct-injection sprayer. Weed Science 49 3 (2001) 359-366
8. Hyvönen T., Holopainen J., and Tiainen F. Detecting the spatial component of variation in the weed community at the farm scale with variation partitioning by canonical correspondence analysis. Weed Research 45 1 (2005) 48-56
9. Kurstjens D A G (2000). Effect of weed and crop variability on selectivity of mechanical weeders. In: 2000 Fourth European Weed Research Society Workshop on Physical Weed Control, Elspeet, The Nederlands.
10. Kurstjens D.A.G., and Perdok U.D. The selective soil covering mechanism of weed harrows on sandy soils. Soil & Tillage Research 55 (2000) 193-206
11. Kurstjens D.A.G., Perdok U.D., and Goense D. Selective uprooting by weed harrowing on sandy soils. Weed Research 40 5 (2000) 431-447
12. McKyes E. Soil Cutting and Tillage (1984), Elsevier Sciences, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
13. Mouazen A.M., Horváth B., and Neményi M. Investigation of forestry deep subsoiling by the finite element method. Hungarian Agricultural Engineering 11 98 (1998) 47-49
14. Mouazen A.M., Ramon H., and De Baerdemaeker J. Variation in the mechanical properties of an agricultural sandy loam soil with bulk density and moisture content. Biosystems Engineering 83 2 (2002) 217-224
15. Peruzzi A., Silvestri N., Gini N., and Coli A. Weed control of winter cereals by means of weeding harrows: First experimental results. Agricoltura Mediteranea 123 (1993) 236-242
16. Rasmussen J (1990). Selectivity-an important parameter on establishing the optimum technique for weed control in growing cereals. In: 1990 Proceedings Seventh European Weed Research Society Symposium, Integrated Weed Management in Cereals, pp 197-204. Heslinki, Finland
17. Rasmussen J. Testing harrows for mechanical control of annual weeds in agricultural crops. Weed Research 32 (1992) 267-274
18. Rodhe L., Rydberg T., and Gebresenbet G. The influence of shallow injector design on ammonia emissions and draught requirement under different soil conditions. Biosystems Engineering 89 2 (2004) 237-251 10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2004.07.001
19. Rydberg T. Weed harrowing-driving speed at different stages of development. Swedish Journal of Agricultural Research 34 (1993) 107-113
20. Upadhyaya S.K., Williams T.H., Kemble L.J., and Collins N.E. Energy requirement for chiselling in coastal plain soils. Transactions the ASAE 27 6 (1984) 1643-1649
21. Vrindts E; De Baerdemaeker J (2000). Using spectral information for weed detection in field circumstances. EurAgEng, Paper No. 00-PA-010, AgEng 2000, Warwick, England
22. Yang C.C., Prasher S.O., Landry J.A., and Ramaswamy H.S. Development of a herbicide application map using artificial neural networks and fuzzy logic. Agricultural Systems 76/2 (2003) 561-574