Ability grouping is not just tracking anymore

Roeper Review

Volumn 26, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 29-36

  Tieso, Carol L ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33845311281     PISSN: 02783193     EISSN: 1940865X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02783190309554236     Document Type: Article

References (82)

1. Adams, R. and Biddle, B. 1970. Realities of teaching: Explorations with videotape, New York: Holt.
2. Archambault, F. X., Westberg, K. L., Brown, S. W., Hallmark, B. W., Emmons, C. L. and Zhang, W. 1993. Regular classroom practices with gifted students: Results of a national survey of classroom teachers, Storrs, CT: National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented.
3. Arlin, M. N. 1982. Teacher responses to student time differences in mastery learning. American Journal of Education, 90: 334-335.
4. Bagley, W. 1931. "The textbook and methods of instruction". In The textbook in American education, Thirtieth yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, Part 2, Edited by: Whipple, G. 7-26. Bloomington, IL: Public School Publishing.
5. Bandura, A. 1994. "Self-efficacy". In Encyclopedia of human behavior, 4 (R-Z index), Edited by: Ramachandran, V. S. 71-81. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
6. Bechtol, W. M. and Sorenson, J. S. 1993. Restructuring schooling for individual students, Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
7. Begle, E. G. 1975. Ability grouping for mathematics instruction: A review of the empirical literature, (Tech. Rep. No. SMESG-WP-17) Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University, Stanford Mathematics Education Study Group.
8. Benbow, C. P. 1998. "Grouping intellectually advanced students for instruction". In Excellence in educating gifted and talented learner, Edited by: Van-Tassel-Baska, J. 279-294. Denver, CO: Love.
9. Bloom, B. S. 1976. Human characteristics and school learning, New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
10. Bode, R. Is it ability grouping or the tailoring of instruction that makes a difference in student achievement?. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Educational Research Association. New York. April.
11. Brooks, J. G. and Brooks, M. G. 1995. The case for constructivist classrooms, Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Developmen.
12. Bruner, J. S. 1960. The process of education, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
13. Bruner, J. S. 1975. Toward a theory of instruction, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
14. Cawelti, G. 1999. Handbook of research on improving student achievement, Arlington, VA: Educational Research Service.
15. Cuban, L. 1984. How teachers taught: Constancy and change in American classrooms 1890-1980, New York: Longman.
16. Davis, G. A. and Rimm, S. A. 1994. The education of the gifted and talented, Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
17. Delisle, R. 1997. How to use problem-based learning in the classroom, Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
18. Eder, D. 1981. Ability grouping as a self-fulfilling prophecy: A micro-analysis of teacher-student interaction. Sociology of Education, 54: 151-162.
19. Erickson, H. L. 1998. Concept-based curriculum and instruction: Teaching beyond the facts, Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
20. Feldhusen, J. F. 1989. "Program models for gifted education". In Excellence in educating the gifted, Edited by: Feldhusen, J. F., VanTassel-Baska, J. and Seeley, K. 263-289. Denver, CO: Love.
21. Feldhusen, J. F. and Moon, S. M. 1992. Grouping gifted students: Issues and concerns. Gifted Child Quarterly, 36(2): 63-67.
22. Flanders, J. R. 1987. How much of the content in mathematics textbooks is new?. Arithmetic Teacher, 35(1): 18-23.
23. Floyd, C. 1954. Meeting children's reading needs in the middle grades: A preliminary report. The Elementary School Journal, 55: 99-103.
24. Gardner, H. 1999. The disciplined mind: What all students should understand, New York: Simon & Schuster.
25. George, P. S. 1988. What's the truth about tracking and ability grouping really???, Gainesville, FL: Teacher Education Resources.
26. Glass, G. V. 1976. Primary, secondary, and meta-analysis of research. Educational Researcher, 5: 3-8.
27. Goldberg, M., Passow, A. H. and Justman, J. 1966. The effects of ability grouping, New York: Teachers College Press.
28. Good, T. L. and Brophy, J. E. 1994. Looking in classrooms, New York: Harper & Row.
29. Good, T. L. and Power. 1976. Designing successful classroom environments for different types of students. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 8: 1-16.
30. Goodlad, J. L. 1966. School, curriculum, and the individual, Waltham, MA: Blaisdell.
31. Goodlad, J. L. 1984. A place called school: Prospects for the future, New York: McGraw-Hill.
32. Goodlad, J. L., Soder, R. and Sorotnik, K., eds. 1990. Places where teachers are taught, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
33. Grinder, R. E. and Nelsen, E. A. 1985. "Individualized instruction in American pedagogy: The saga of an educational ideology and a practice in the making". In Adapting instruction to individual differences, Edited by: Wang, M. C. and Walberg, H. J. 24-43. Berkeley, CA: McCutchan.
34. Halpern, D. F. 1996. Thought & knowledge: An introduction to critical thinking, Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
35. Hirsch, E. D. 1987. Cultural literacy, Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
36. Jacobs, H. H. 1989. Interdisciplinary curriculum: Design and implementation, Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
37. Kaplan, S. N. 1986. "The grid: A model to construct differentiated curriculum for the gifted". In Systems and models for developing programs for the gifted and talented, Edited by: Renzulli, J. S. 180-193. Mansfield, CT: Creative Learning Press.
38. Kaplan, S. A. 2001. "Layering differentiated curriculum for the gifted and talented". In Methods and materials for leaching the gifted, Edited by: Karnes, F. and Bean, S. Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.
39. Kulik, J. A. 1992. An analysis of the research on ability grouping: Historical and contemporary perspectives, Storrs, CT: National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented.
40. Kulik, J. A. 2003. "Grouping and tracking". In Handbook of gifted education, Edited by: Colangelo, N. and Davis, G. 268-281. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
41. Kulik, C-L. C. and Kulik, J. A. 1982. Effects of ability grouping on secondary school students: A meta-analysis of evaluation findings. American Educational Research Journal, 19(3): 414-428.
42. Kulik, J. A. and Kulik, C-L. C. 1984. Effects of accelerated instruction on students. Review of Educational Research, 54(3): 409-425.
43. Kulik, J. A. and Kulik, C-L. C. 1992. Meta-analytic findings on grouping programs. Gifted Child Quarterly, 36(2): 73-77.
44. Levin, H. M. 1987. Accelerated schools for disadvantaged students. Educational Leadership, 52(3): 19-21.
45. Lou, Y., Abrami, P. C., Spence, J. C., Poulsen, C., Chambers, B. and d'Apollonia, S. 1996. Within-class grouping: A meta-analysis. Review of educational research, 66(4): 423-458.
46. Maker, C. J. 1982. Curriculum development for the gifted, Rockville, MD: Aspen.
47. Marsh, H. W. and Parker, N. 1985. Self-concepts: Their relationship to age, sex, and academic measures. American Educational Research Journal, 22(3): 422-444.
48. Mills, C. J., Ablard, K. E. and Gustin, W. C. 1994. Academically talented students' achievement in a flexibly paced mathematics program. Mathematics Achievement, 25(5): 495-509.
49. National Center for Education Statistics: Common Core of Data Survey. 1997. [Electronic database], Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
50. Newman, R. S. and Schwager, M. T. 1992. "Student perceptions and academic help-seeking". In Student perceptions in the classroom, Edited by: Schunk, D. H. and Meece, J. L. Hillsdale, NI: Lawrence Erlbaum.
51. Oakes, J. 1985. Keeping track: How schools structure inequality, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
52. Page, E. B. 1965. Statistically recapturing the richness within the classroom. Psychology in the Schools, 12: 339-344.
53. Passow, A. H. 1962. Differentiated curricula for the gifted/talented, Ventura, CA: Leadership Training Institute on the Gifted and Talented.
54. Paul, R., Binker, A. J. A., Jensen, K. and Kreklau, H. 1990. Critical thinking handbook: 4th -6th grades: A guide for remodeling lesson plans in language arts, social studies, & science, Rohnert Park, CA: The Center for Thinking and Moral Critique.
55. Phenix, P. H. 1958. Philosophy of education, New York, NY: Hold and Company.
56. Phenix, P. H. 1964. Realms of meaning, New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
57. Reis, S. M., Westberg, K. L., Kulikowich, J., Caillard, F., Hebert, T., Plucker, J., Purcell, J. H., Rogers, J. B. and Smist, J. M. 1993. Why not let high ability students start school in January? The curriculum compacting study, Storrs, CT: National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented.
58. Renzulli, J. S. 1977. The enrichment triad model: A guide for developing defensible programs for the gifted and talented, Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press.
59. Renzulli, J. S. 1988. The multiple menu model for developing differentiated curriculum for the gifted and talented. Gifted Child Quarterly, 32(3): 298-309.
60. Renzulli, J. S. 1994. Schools for talent development: A practical plan for total school improvement, Mansfield, CT: Creative Learning Press.
61. Renzulli, J. S., Leppien, J. H. and Hays, T. S. 2000. The multiple menu model: Practical guide for developing differentiated curriculum, Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press.
62. Rogers, K. A. 1991. The relationship of grouping practices to the education of the gifted and talented learner, Storrs, CT: National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented.
63. Rogers, K. A. 1993. Grouping the gifted and talented: Questions and answers. Roeper Review, 16(1): 8-12.
64. Rogers, K. A. and Kimpston, R. D. 1992. Acceleration: What we do vs. what we know. Educational Leadership, 50(2): 58-61.
65. Rosenbaum, J. 1980. Social implications of educational grouping. Review of Research in Education, 8: 361-401.
66. Schunk, D. H. 1996. Learning theories, Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
67. Slavin, R. E. 1987. Ability grouping and student achievement in elementary schools: A best-evidence synthesis. Review of Educational Research, 57(3): 293-336.
68. Slavin, R. E. 1988. Synthesis of research on grouping in elementary and secondary schools. Educational Leadership, 46(1): 67-76.
69. Slavin, R. E. 1990. Achievement effects of ability grouping in secondary schools. Review of Educational Research, 57(3): 293-336.
70. Sorensen, H. and Hallinan, S. 1986. Effects of ability grouping on growth in academic achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 23(4): 519-542.
71. Tieso, C. L. 2002. The effects of grouping and curricular practices on intermediate students' mathematics achievement, Storrs, CT: National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented.
72. Tomlinson, C. A. 1995. How to differentiate instruction in mixed-ability classrooms, Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
73. Tomlinson, C. A. 1999. The differentiated classroom: Responding to the needs of all learners, Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Developmen.
74. Tomlinson, C. A., Kaplan, S. N., Renzulli, J. S., Purcell, J., Leppien, J. and Burns, D. E. 2002. The parallel curriculum: A design to develop high potential and challenge high-ability learners, Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
75. VanTassel-Baska, J. 1986. Effective curriculum and instructional models for talented students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 30(4): 164-169.
76. VanTassel-Baska, J. 1994. Comprehensive curriculum for gifted learners, Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
77. VanTassel-Baska, J. and Little, C. A. 2003. Content-based curriculum for high ability learners, Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.
78. Walberg, H. J. 1985. "Instructional theories and research evidence". In Adapting instruction to individual differences, Edited by: Wang, M. C. and Walberg, H. J. 3-23. Berkeley, CA: McCutchan.
79. Wang, M. C. and Walberg, H. J. 1985. Adapting instruction to individual differences, Berkeley, CA: McCutchan.
80. Ward, V. S. 1980. Differential education for the gifted, Ventura, CA: Ventura County Superintendent of Schools Office.
81. Westberg, K. L. and Archambault, F. X. 1995. Profiles of successful practices for high ability students in elementary classrooms, Storrs, CT: National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented.
82. Wiggins, G. and McTighe, J. 1998. Understanding by design, Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.