The role of inter-unit coordination mechanisms in knowledge sharing: A case study of a British MNC

Journal of Information Science

Volumn 32, Issue 6, 2006, Pages 539-561

  Willem, Annick ^a   Buelens, Marc ^a,b   Scarbrough, Harry ^c  

^a GHENT UNIVERSITY   (Belgium)

^b VLERICK BUSINESS SCHOOL   (Belgium)

^c UNIVERSITY OF WARWICK   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Case study; Coordination mechanisms; Knowledge sharing; Multinationals; Organization structure

Indexed keywords

COMPUTATIONAL COMPLEXITY; DATA ACQUISITION; INFORMATION MANAGEMENT; PROBLEM SOLVING; SOCIETIES AND INSTITUTIONS;

CASE STUDY; COORDINATION MECHANISMS; KNOWLEDGE SHARING; MULTINATIONALS; ORGANIZATION STRUCTURE;

KNOWLEDGE BASED SYSTEMS;

EID: 33845310837     PISSN: 01655515     EISSN: 17416485     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0165551506067128     Document Type: Article

References (69)

1. A.K. Gupta and V. Govindarajan, Knowledge flows within multinational corporations, Strategic Management Journal 21 (2000) 473 - 496.
2. W.G. Egelhoff, Information-processing theory and the multinational enterprise, Journal of International Business Studies 22 (3) (1991) 341 - 367.
3. B. Chae and J.M. Bloodgood, The paradox of knowledge management: an eastern philosophical perspective, Information and Organization 16 (1) (2006) 1 - 26.
4. W. Tsai, Social structure of "coopetition" within a multinunit organization: coordination, competition, and interorganizational knowledge sharing, Organization Science 13 (2) (2002) 179 - 190.
5. M.T. Hansen, The search-transfer problem: the role of weak ties in sharing knowledge across organization subunits, Administrative Science Quarterly 44 (1999) 82 - 111.
6. L. Argote and P. Ingram, Knowledge transfer: a basis for competitive advantage in firms, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 82 (1) (2000) 150 - 169.
7. J.R. Galbraith, Designing Organizations ( Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, 1995 ).
8. R.M. Grant, Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm, Strategic Management Journal 17 (1996) 109 - 122 [Winter Special Issue].
9. H. Mintzberg, Mintzberg on Management ( Free Press, New York, 1989 ).
10. C.U. Ciborra and R. Andreu, Sharing knowledge across boundaries, Journal of Information Technology 16 (2001) 73 - 81.
11. S.R. Nidumolu, A comparison of the structural contingency and risk-based perspectives on coordination in software develoment projects, Journal of Information Systems 13 (2) (1996) 77 - 113.
12. G. Widén-Wulff and M. Ginman, Explaining knowledge sharing in organizations through the dimensions of social capital, Journal of Information Science 30 (5) (2004) 448 - 458.
13. S. Ghoshal, H. Korine and G. Szulanski, Interunit communication in multinational corporations, Management Science 40 (1) (1994) 96 - 110.
14. L. Argote, Input uncertainty and organizational coordination in hospital emergency units, Administrative Science Quarterly 27 (1982) 420 - 434.
15. A.H. Van De Ven, A.L. Delbecq and R. Koenig, Determinants of coordination modes within organizations, American Sociological Review 41 (April) (1976) 322 - 338.
16. G.W. Meyer, Social information processing and social networks: a test of social influence mechanisms, Human Relations 47 (9) (1994) 1013 - 1048.
17. J. Birkinshaw, R. Nobel and J. Ridderstrale, Knowledge as a contingency variable: do the characteristics of knowledge predict organization structure?, Organization Science 13 (3) (2002) 274 - 289.
18. B. Kogut and U. Zander, Knowledge of the fitm and the evolutionary theory of the multinational corporation, Journal of International Business Studies 24 (4) (1993) 624 - 645.
19. J.R. Galbraith, Designing Complex Organizations ( Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 1973 ).
20. S. Newell and J. Swan, Trust and inter-organizational networking, Human Relations 53 (10) (2000) 1287 - 1327.
21. D. Constant, S. Kiesler and L. Sproull, What's mine is ours, or is it? A study of attitudes about information sharing, Information Systems Research 5 (4) (1994) 400 - 421.
22. S.L. Jarvenpaa and D.S. Staples, Exploring perceptions of organizational ownership of information and expertise, Journal of Management Information Systems 18 (1) (2001) 151 - 183.
23. Y.M. Mei, S.T. Lee and S. Al-Hawamdeh, Formulating a communication strategy for effective knowledge sharing, Journal of Information Science 30 (1) (2004) 12 - 22.
24. S.W. Chou and M.Y. He, Knowledge management: the distinctive roles of knowledge assets in facilitating knowledge creation, Journal of Information Science 30 (4) (2004) 146 - 164.
25. P.S. Adler and S. W. Kwon, Social capital: prospects for a new concept, Academy of Management Review 27 (1) (2002) 17 - 40.
26. D. Krackhardt, Assessing the political landscape: structure, cognition, and power in organizations, Administrative Science Quarterly 35 (1990) 342 - 369.
27. H. Hall, Input-friendliness: motivating knowledge sharing across intranets, Journal of Information Science 27 (3) (2001) 139 - 146.
28. B. Levitt and J. March, Organizational learning, Annual Review of Sociology 14 (1988) 319 - 340.
29. S. Nidumolu, M. Subramani and A. Aldrich, Situated learning and the situated knowledge web: exploring the ground beneath knowledge management, Journal of Management Information Systems 18 (1) (2001) 115 - 150.
30. R.L. Daft and R.H. Lengel, Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design, Management Science 32 (5) (1986) 554 - 571.
31. M. Gargiulo and M. Benassi, Trapped in your own net? Network cohesion, structural holes, and the adaptation of social capital, Organization Science 11 (2) (2000) 183 - 196.
32. B. Choi and H. Lee, An empirical investigation of KM styles and their effect on corporate performance, Information and Management 40 (2003) 203 - 217.
33. M. Earl, Knowledge management strategies: towards a taxonomy, Journal of Management Information Systems 18 (1) (2001) 215 - 233.
34. T.D. Jick, Mixing qualitative and quantitative methods: triangulation in action, Administrative Science Quarterly 24 (December) (1979) 602 - 611.
35. T.A. Scandura and E.A. Williams, Research methodology in management: current practices, trends, and implications for future research, Academy of Management Journal 43 (6) (2000) 1248 - 1264.
36. G. Szulanski, The process of knowledge transfer: a diachronic analysis of stickiness, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 82 (1) (2000) 9 - 27.
37. P.J. Lane and M. Lubatkin, Relative absorptive capacity and interorganizational learning, Strategic Management Journal 19 (1998) 461 - 477.
38. D.G. Hoopes and S. Postrel, Shared knowledge, "glitches" and product development performance, Strategic Management Journal 20 (1999) 837 - 865.
39. C. Gresov and C. Stephans, The context of interunit influence attempts, Administrative Science Quarterly 38 (2) (1993) 252 - 270.
40. P.K. Kopalle and D.R. Lehmann, Alpha inflation? The impact of eliminating scale items on Cronbach's Alpha, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 70 (3) (1997) 189 - 197.
41. J.C. Nunnally, Psychometric Theory ( McGraw-Hill, New York, 1978 ).
42. P.M. Podsakoff and D.W. Organ, Self-reports on organizational research: problems and prospects, Jounal of Management 12 (4) (1986) 531 - 544.
43. J.L. Arbuckle, AMOS: analysis of moment structures, Psychometrika 59 (1994) 135 - 137.
44. R.B. Kline, Principles and Practices of Structural Equation Modelling ( Guilford Press, New York, 1998 ).
45. P.S. Adler, Market, hierarchy, and trust: the knowledge economy and the future of capitalism, Organization Science 12 (4) (2001) 215 - 234.
46. P. Cohendet, F. Kern, B. Mehmanpazir and F. Munier, Knowledge coordination, competence creation and integrated networks in globalised firms, Cambridge Journal of Economics 23 (1999) 225 - 241.
47. P.J. Buckley and M.J. Carter, Managing cross-border complementary knowledge, International Studies of Management and Organization 29 (1) (1999) 80 - 104.
48. H. Lee and B. Choi, Knowledge management, enablers, processes and organizational performance: an integrative view and empirical examination, Journal of Management Information Systems 20 (1) (2003) 179 - 228.
49. I. Becerra-Fernandez and R. Sabherwal, Organizational knowledge management: a contingency perspective, Journal of Management Information Systems 18 (1) (2001) 32 - 55.
50. G. Szulanski, Exploring internal stickiness: impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm, Strategic Management Journal 17 (1996) 27 - 43.[Winter Special Issue].
51. H. Mintzberg, The Structuring of Organizations ( Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, 1979 ).
52. S.B. Bacharach and M. Aiken, Structural and process constraints on influence in organizations: a level specific analysis, Administrative Science Quarterly 21 (4) ( 1976 ).
53. H.A. Simon, Administrative Behavior ( Free Press, New York, 1997 ).
54. D. Miller and C. Droge, Psychological and traditional determinants of structure, Administrative Science Quarterly 31 (1986) 539 - 560.
55. L.F. Edelman, M. Bresnen, S. Newell and H. Scarbrough, The benefits and pitfalls of social capital: empirical evidence from two organizations in the United Kingdom, British Journal of Management 15 (S1) (2004) 59 - 69.
56. D.H. Kim, The link between individual and organizational learning, Sloan Management Review (Fall 1993) 37 - 50.
57. L.L. Thompson, J.M. Levine and D.M. Messick (eds.), Shared Cognition in Organisations ( Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, 1999 ).
58. U. Zander and B. Kogut, Knowledge and the speed of the transfer and imitation of organizational capabilities: an empirical test, Organization Science 6 (1) (1995) 76 - 92.
59. P. Baumard, Tacit Knowledge ( Sage, London, 1999 ).
60. M. Polanyi, Tacit knowledge. In: L. Prusak (ed.), Knowledge in Organizations ( Butterworth-Heinemann, Boston, 1997 ).
61. H. Tsoukas, The firm as a distributed knowledge system: a constructionist approach, Strategic Management Journal 17 (1996) 11 - 25.[Winter Special Issue].
62. M. Augier, S.Z. Shariq and M.T. Vendelo, Understanding context: its emergence, transformation and role in tacit knowledge sharing, Journal of Knowledge Management 5 (2) (2001) 125 - 136.
63. D. Cohen and D.A. Levinthal, Absorptive capacity: a new perspective on learning and innovation, Administrative Science Quarterly 35 (1990) 129 - 152.
64. B. Kogut and U. Zander, What firms do? Coordination, identity, and learning, Organization Science 7 (5) (1996) 502 - 518.
65. G.M. Spreitzer and A.K. Mishra, Giving up control without losing control, Group and Organization Management 24 (2) (1999) 155 - 187.
66. G. Devos, K. Vanderheyden and H. van den Broeck, A Framework for Assessing Commitment to Change: Process and Context Variables of Organizational Change ( AOM, Washington, 2001 ).
67. R. Berman Brown and M.J. Woodland, Managing knowledge wisely: a case study in organisational behaviour, Journal of Applied Management Studies 8 (2) (1999) 175 - 198.
68. K.R. Conner and C.K. Prahalad, A resource-based theory of the firm: knowledge versus opportunism, Organization Science 7 (5) (1996) 477 - 501.
69. B. Heiman and J.A. Nickerson, Towards reconciling transaction cost economics and the knowledge-based view of the firm: the context of interfirm collaborations, International Journal of the Economics of Business 9 (1) (2002) 97 - 116.