Forensic application of linguistic analysis

Interviewing and Deception

Volumn , Issue , 2018, Pages 105-125

  Coulthard, Malcolm ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BIRMINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33845304377     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780429428517-6     Document Type: Chapter

References (26)

1. Baldwin, J. and French, J. (1990). Forensic Phonetics. London: Pinter.
2. Brazil, D. C. (1985). The Communicative Value of Intonation. Birmingham: English Language Research.
3. Canter, D. (1992). An Evaluation of the ‘Cusum’ Stylistic Analysis of Confessions, Expert Evidence, I, ii.
4. Coulthard, R. M. (ed) (1986). Talking about Text. Birmingham: ELR.
5. Coulthard, R. M. (1992). ‘Forensic Discourse Analysis’, in R. M. Coulthard (ed), Advances in Spoken Discourse Analysis. London: Routledge, 242-57.
6. Coulthard, R. M. (1993). ‘Beginning the Study of Forensic Texts: Corpus, Concordance, Collocation’, Data Description Discourse, London: Harper Collins, 86-97.
7. Coulthard, R. M. (1994a). ‘Powerful Evidence for the Defence: an Exercise in Forensic Discourse Analysis’, in J. Gibbons (ed), Language and the Law, London: Longman, 1441-42.
8. Coulthard, R. M. (1994b). ‘On the Use of Corpora in the Analysis of Forensic Texts’, Forensic Linguistics, 1, 1, 27-43.
9. Davis, T. (1986). ‘Forensic Handwriting Analysis’ in R. M. Coulthard (ed) Talking about Text. Birmingham: ELR, 189-207.
10. Davis, T. (1994). ‘ESDA and the Analysis of Contested Contemporaneous Notes of Police Interviews’, Forensic Linguistics: the International Journal Of Speech Language and the Law, 1, i, 71-89.
11. Fox, G. (1993). ‘A Comparison of “Policespeak” and “Normalspeak”: a Preliminary Study’ in J.M. Sinclair, M. Hoey and G. Fox (eds) Techniques of Description: Spoken and Written Discourse, A Festschrift for Malcolm Coulthard, London: Routledge 183-95.
12. French, J. P. (1994) An Overview of Forensic Phonetics with Particular Reference to Speaker Identification. Forensic Linguistics: the International Journal of Speech Language and the Law, 1, 2, 169-181.
13. Gibbons, J. (ed) (1994). Language and the law, London: Longman.
14. Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and Conversation, in P. Cole and J. Morgan (eds) Syntax and Semantics III, Speech Acts, New York: Academic Press, 41-58.
15. Halliday, M. A. K. (1989) Spoken and Written Language, 2nd edition, Oxford: OUP.
16. Hollien, H. (1990) The Acoustics of Crime London: Plenum.
17. Kunzel, H. (1987). Sprechererkennung: Grudzuge Forensischer, Heidelberg: Kriminalistik-Verlag.
18. Levi, J. (1994a). Language as Evidence: the Linguist as Expert Witness in North American Courts, Forensic Linguistics, 1, i, 1-26.
19. Levi, J. (1994b). Language as Evidence: the Linguist as Expert Witness in North American Courts, Forensic Linguistics: the International Journal of Speech Language and the Law, 1, 1, 1-26.
20. Levi, J. N. and Walker, A. G. (eds) (1990). Language In the Judicial Process, London: Plenum.
21. Morton, A. Q. (1991). Proper Words in Proper Places, Glasgow: University, Department of Computing Science.
22. Nolan, F. (1983). The Phonetic Bases of Speaker Recognition Cambridge: CUP.
23. Sanford, A. J., Aked, J. P., Moxey, L. M. and Mullin, J. (1994). A Critical Examination of Assumptions Underlying the Cusum Technique of Forensic Linguistics. Forensic Linguistics: the International Journal of Speech Language and the Law, 1, 2, 151-167.
24. Sinclair, J. McH. Unpublished expert opinion on the ordinary man’s understanding of the word “visa”.
25. Sinclair, J. McH. (1991). Corpus, Concordance, Collocation, Oxford OUP.
26. Svartvik, J. (1968). The Evans Statements: A Case for Forensic Linguistics, Goteborg, University of Gothenburg Press.