School-based collaborative teams: An exploratory study of tasks and activities

Children and Schools

Volumn 28, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 229-235

  Phillippo, Kate ^a   Stone, Susan ^b  

^a STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Multidisciplinary teams; School social work; Tasks

Indexed keywords

EID: 33845299861     PISSN: 15328759     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/cs/28.4.229     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Allen-Meares, P. (1994). Social work services in schools: A national study of entry-level tasks. Social Work, 39, 560-565.
2. Allen-Meares, P., & Dupper, D. R. (1998). A national study of knowledges, skills, and abilities: Curriculum development for practice in schools. Journal of Teaching in Social Work, 17(12), 101-119.
3. Auerswald, E. H. (1968). Interdisciplinary versus ecological approach. Family Process, 7, 202-215.
4. Brand, C., & O'Conner, L. (2004). School refusal: It takes a team. Children & Schools, 26, 54-64.
5. Bronfenbrenner, U., & Hamilton, S. F. (1978). School effectiveness in ecological perspective. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health, Education and Welfare, National Institute of Education. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service ED 182 371)
6. Bryk, A. S., & Schneider, B. (2002). Trust in schools: A core resource for improvement. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
7. California Department of Education. (2003). AB 722 study of pupil personnel ratios, services and programs. Sacramento: California Department of Education, Counseling and Student Support Office.
8. Comer, J. P. (1980). School power. New York: Free Press.
9. Comer, J. P. (2004). Leave no child behind: Preparing today's youth for tomorrow's world. New Haven, CT:Yale University Press.
10. Comer, J. P., Haynes, N. M., Joyner, E.T., & Ben-Avie, M. (1996). Rallying the whole village: The Comer process for reforming education. New York: Teachers College Press.
11. Constable, R., & Thomas, G. (2002). Assessment, multidisciplinary teamwork, and consultation: Foundations for role development. In R. Constable, S. McDonald, & I. P. Flynn (Eds.), School social work: Practice, policy and research perspectives (5th ed., pp. 153-162). Chicago: Lyceum.
12. Cook, T. D., Murphy, R. F., & Hunt, H. D. (2000). Comer's School Development Program in Chicago: A theory-based evaluation. American Educational Research Journal, 37, 535-597.
13. Fagin, C. M. (1992). Collaboration between nurses and physicians: No longer a choice. Academic Medicine, 67, 295-303.
14. Franzosi, R. P. (2004). Content analysis. In M. Hardy & A. Bryman (Eds.), Handbook of data analysis (pp. 547-565). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
15. Hallam, S., & Castle, F. (2001). Exclusion from school: What can prevent it? Educational Review, 53, 169-179.
16. Hammond, H., & Ingalls, L. (1999). Maintaining school-based prereferral teams: An eight-year study. Rural Special Education Quarterly, 18(2), 17-21.
17. Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act of 2004, P.L. 108-446, 118 Stat 2647.
18. Knox, K. S., & Roberts, A. R. (2005). Crisis intervention and crisis team models in schools. Children & Schools, 27, 93-100.
19. Moses, C. W., & Coltoff, P. (1999). Organizational change to promote psychosocial and academic development. In R.W.C. Tourse & J. F. Mooney (Eds.), Collaborative practice: School and human service partnerships (pp. 241-264). Westport, CT: Praeger.
20. National Research Council and the Institute of Medicine. (2004). Engaging schools: Fostering high school students' motivation to learn (Committee on Increasing High School Students' Engagement and Motivation to Learn, Board on Children, Youth and Families, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education).Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
21. Payne, C. (in press)."I don't want your nasty pot of gold": The Comer school development process and the development of Leadership in Urban Schools. In A. Datnow & J. Murphy (Eds.), Leadership for school reform: Lessons from comprehensive school reform designs Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
22. Radin, N., & Welsh, B. L. (1984). Social work, psychology, and counseling in the schools. Social Work, 29, 28-33.
23. Rosenblum, L., DiCecco, M. B., Taylor, L., & Adelman, H. S. (1995). Upgrading school support programs through collaboration: Resource coordinating teams. Social Work in Education, 17, 117-124.
24. Sebring, P.A., Bryk, A. S., Roderick, M., Camburn, E., Luppescu, S., Thum, Y. M., Lopez, W., Smith, B., & Kahne, J. (1996). Charting reform: The students speak. Chicago: Consortium on Chicago School Research.
25. Thousand, J. S., & Villa, R. A. (1992). Collaborative teams: A powerful tool in school restructuring. In R. A. Villa, J. S. Thousand, W. Stainback, & S. Stainback (Eds.), Restructuring for caring & effective education: An administrative guide to creating heterogeneous schools (pp. 73-108). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
26. Toseland, R. W., & Rivas, R. F. (2004). Introduction to group work practice. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
27. Tourse, R.W.C., & Sulick, J. (1999). The collaborative alliance: Supporting vulnerable children in school. In R.W.C. Tourse & J. F. Mooney (Eds.), Collaborative practice: School and human service partnerships (pp. 59-78). Westport, CT: Praeger.
28. Villa, R. A., & Thousand, J. S. (Eds.). (2000). Restructuring for caring and effective education: Piecing the puzzle together. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.