Inner-shell excitation spectroscopy and fragmentation of small hydrogen-bonded clusters of formic acid after core excitations at the oxygen K edge

Journal of Chemical Physics

Volumn 125, Issue 19, 2006, Pages

  Tabayashi, Kiyohiko ^a   Yamamoto, Keisuke ^a   Takahashi, Osamu ^a   Tamenori, Yusuke ^b   Harries, James R ^b   Gejo, Tatsuo ^c   Iseda, Mitsuhiro ^c   Tamura, Takashi ^c   Honma, Kenji ^c   Suzuki, Isao H ^d   Nagaoka, Shin Ichi ^e   Ibuki, Toshio ^f  

^a HIROSHIMA UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^b JAPAN SYNCHROTRON RADIATION RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Japan)

^c UNIVERSITY OF HYOGO   (Japan)

^d NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ADVANCED INDUSTRIAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY AIST   (Japan)

^e EHIME UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^f KYOTO UNIVERSITY OF EDUCATION   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CHARGE TRANSFER; HYDROGEN BONDS; MASS SPECTROMETRY; MOLECULES; POSITIVE IONS; RESONANCE;

CATIONIC CLUSTER; CYCLIC DIMER; INNER-SHELL EXCITATION SPECTROSCOPY; TIME-OF-FLIGHT FRAGMENT MASS SPECTROSCOPY;

ORGANIC ACIDS;

EID: 33845294421     PISSN: 00219606     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1063/1.2387949     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. E. Rühl, in Progress in Experimental and Theoretical Studies of Clusters, edited by, T. Kondow, and, F. Mafune, (World Scientific, Singapore, 2003), p. 189; Int. J. Mass. Spectrom. 229, 117 (2003).
2. E. Rühl, in Progress in Experimental and Theoretical Studies of Clusters, edited by, T. Kondow, and, F. Mafune, (World Scientific, Singapore, 2003), p. 189; Int. J. Mass. Spectrom. 229, 117 (2003).
3. For example, see J. Stöhr, NEXAFS Spectroscopy, Springer Series in Surface Science Vol. 25 (Springer, Berlin, 1992); P. Wernet, D. Nordlund, U. Bergmann, Science 304, 995 (2004).
4. For example, see J. Stöhr, NEXAFS Spectroscopy, Springer Series in Surface Science Vol. 25 (Springer, Berlin, 1992); P. Wernet, D. Nordlund, U. Bergmann, Science 304, 995 (2004).
5. I. Ishii and A. P. Hitchcock, J. Chem. Phys. 87, 830 (1987).
6. I. Ishii and A. P. Hitchcock, J. Electron Spectrosc. Relat. Phenom. 46, 55 (1988).
7. D. A. Outka, J. Stöhr, R. J. Madix, H. H. Rotermund, B. Hermsmeier, and J. Solomon, Surf. Sci. 185, 53 (1987).
8. K. C. Prince, R. Richter, M. de Simone, M. Alagia, and M. Coreno, J. Phys. Chem. A 107, 1955 (2003).
9. A. K. Roy and A. J. Thakkar, Chem. Phys. Lett. 0009-2614 10.1016/j.cplett.2004.01.031 386, 162 (2004); A. K. Roy and A. J. Thakkar, Chem. Phys. Lett. 0009-2614 10.1016/j.cplett.2004.06.067 393, 347 (2004); A. K. Roy and A. J. Thakkar, Chem. Phys. 312, 119 (2005).
10. A. K. Roy and A. J. Thakkar, Chem. Phys. Lett. 0009-2614 10.1016/j.cplett.2004.01.031 386, 162 (2004); A. K. Roy and A. J. Thakkar, Chem. Phys. Lett. 0009-2614 10.1016/j.cplett.2004.06.067 393, 347 (2004); A. K. Roy and A. J. Thakkar, Chem. Phys. 312, 119 (2005).
11. A. K. Roy and A. J. Thakkar, Chem. Phys. Lett. 0009-2614 10.1016/j.cplett.2004.01.031 386, 162 (2004); A. K. Roy and A. J. Thakkar, Chem. Phys. Lett. 0009-2614 10.1016/j.cplett.2004.06.067 393, 347 (2004); A. K. Roy and A. J. Thakkar, Chem. Phys. 312, 119 (2005).
12. (a) M. Stein and J. Sauer, Chem. Phys. Lett. 0009-2614 10.1016/S0009-2614(97)00060-2 267, 111 (1997); (b) J. M. H. Ramon and M. A. Rios, Chem. Phys. 250, 155 (1999).
13. (a) M. Stein and J. Sauer, Chem. Phys. Lett. 0009-2614 10.1016/S0009-2614(97)00060-2 267, 111 (1997); (b) J. M. H. Ramon and M. A. Rios, Chem. Phys. 250, 155 (1999).
14. L. Turi, J. Phys. Chem. 100, 11285 (1996).
15. O. Takahashi, S. Yamanouchi, K. Yamamoto, and K. Tabayashi, Chem. Phys. Lett. 419, 501 (2006).
16. For example, see H. Ohashi, E. Ishiguro, Y. Tamenori, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A 467-468, 533 (2001), and related papers therein.
17. Y. Tamenori, T. Yamaguchi, K. Okada, K. Tabayashi, T. Gejo, and K. Honma, J. Electron Spectrosc. Relat. Phenom. 144-147, 235 (2005).
18. Y. Tamenori, T. Yamaguchi, K. Okada, K. Yamamoto, K. Tabayashi, A. Hiraya, T. Gejo, and K. Honma (unpublished).
19. A. Hiraya, Y. Senba, H. Yoshida, and K. Tanaka, J. Electron Spectrosc. Relat. Phenom. 101-103, 1025 (1999).
20. K. C. Prince, L. Avaldi, M. Coreno, R. Camilloni, and M. de Simone, J. Phys. B 32, 2551 (1999).
21. D. Borchardt, J. F. Caballero, and S. H. Bauer, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 109, 6651 (1987).
22. J. Chao and B. J. Zwolinski, J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data 7, 363 (1978).
23. S. Tada, C. Harada, H. Yoshida, S. Wada, A. Hiraya, K. Tanaka, and K. Tabayashi, J. Chem. Phys. 123, 124309 (2005).
24. E. Rühl, Ber. Bunsenges. Phys. Chem. 96, 1172 (1992); J. Geiger, S. Rabe, C. Heinzel, H. Baumgärtel, and E. Rühl, in Linking the Gaseous and Condensed Phase of Matter, edited by, L. G. Christophorou, E. Illenberger, and, W. F. Schmidt, (Plenum, New York, 1994), p. 217.
25. E. Rühl, Ber. Bunsenges. Phys. Chem. 96, 1172 (1992); J. Geiger, S. Rabe, C. Heinzel, H. Baumgärtel, and E. Rühl, in Linking the Gaseous and Condensed Phase of Matter, edited by, L. G. Christophorou, E. Illenberger, and, W. F. Schmidt, (Plenum, New York, 1994), p. 217.
26. O. F. Hagena, Z. Phys. D: At., Mol. Clusters 0178-7683 10.1007/BF01436638 4, 291 (1987); A. A. Vostrikov and D. Y. Dubov, Z. Phys. D: At., Mol. Clusters 20, 429 (1991).
27. O. F. Hagena, Z. Phys. D: At., Mol. Clusters 0178-7683 10.1007/BF01436638 4, 291 (1987); A. A. Vostrikov and D. Y. Dubov, Z. Phys. D: At., Mol. Clusters 20, 429 (1991).
28. S. Yamanouchi, Graduate thesis, Hiroshima University, 2005.
29. L. A. Curtiss, J. Chem. Phys. 67, 1144 (1977).
30. N. Goldman, R. S. Fellers, M. G. Brown, L. B. Braly, C. J. Keoshian, C. Leforestier, and R. J. Saykally, J. Chem. Phys. 116, 10148 (2002).
31. J. Geiger and E. Rühl, Int. J. Mass. Spectrom. 220, 99 (2002).
32. S. Y. Lee, D. N. Shin, S. G. Cho, K.-H. Jung, and K. W. Jung, J. Mass Spectrom. 30, 969 (1995).
33. D. Ji and T. D. Thomas, J. Electron Spectrosc. Relat. Phenom. 67, 233 (1994).
34. W. L. Jolly, K. D. Bomben, and C. J. Eyermann, At. Data Nucl. Data Tables 0092-640X 10.1016/0092-640X(84)90011-1 31, 433 (1984);
35. A. Naves de Brito, N. Correia, S. Svensson, and H. Ågren, J. Chem. Phys. 95, 2965 (1991).
36. When the excited molecular-cation site is electronically relaxed, preferential production of COO H+ (+H) could be expected as the lowest-energy channel. Significant production of HC O+ rather than the COO H+ may suggest the dissociation in electronically excited states; for example, see M. Schwell, F. Dulieu, H.-W. Jochims, J.-H. Fillion, J.-L. Lemaire, H. Baumgärtel, and S. Leach, J. Phys. Chem. A 1089-5639 106, 10908 (2002); P. C. Burgers, J. L. Holmes, and J. E. Szulejko, Int. J. Mass Spectrom. Ion Process. 0168-1176 10.1016/0168-1176(84)85172-1 57, 159 (1984); B. Ruscic, M. Schwarz, and J. Berkowitz, J. Chem. Phys. 91, 6772 (1989).
37. When the excited molecular-cation site is electronically relaxed, preferential production of COO H+ (+H) could be expected as the lowest-energy channel. Significant production of HC O+ rather than the COO H+ may suggest the dissociation in electronically excited states; for example, see M. Schwell, F. Dulieu, H.-W. Jochims, J.-H. Fillion, J.-L. Lemaire, H. Baumgärtel, and S. Leach, J. Phys. Chem. A 1089-5639 106, 10908 (2002); P. C. Burgers, J. L. Holmes, and J. E. Szulejko, Int. J. Mass Spectrom. Ion Process. 0168-1176 10.1016/0168-1176(84)85172-1 57, 159 (1984); B. Ruscic, M. Schwarz, and J. Berkowitz, J. Chem. Phys. 91, 6772 (1989).
38. When the excited molecular-cation site is electronically relaxed, preferential production of COO H+ (+H) could be expected as the lowest-energy channel. Significant production of HC O+ rather than the COO H+ may suggest the dissociation in electronically excited states; for example, see M. Schwell, F. Dulieu, H.-W. Jochims, J.-H. Fillion, J.-L. Lemaire, H. Baumgärtel, and S. Leach, J. Phys. Chem. A 1089-5639 106, 10908 (2002); P. C. Burgers, J. L. Holmes, and J. E. Szulejko, Int. J. Mass Spectrom. Ion Process. 0168-1176 10.1016/0168-1176(84)85172-1 57, 159 (1984); B. Ruscic, M. Schwarz, and J. Berkowitz, J. Chem. Phys. 91, 6772 (1989).
39. When the excited molecular-cation site is electronically relaxed, preferential production of COO H+ (+H) could be expected as the lowest-energy channel. Significant production of HC O+ rather than the COO H+ may suggest the dissociation in electronically excited states; for example, see M. Schwell, F. Dulieu, H.-W. Jochims, J.-H. Fillion, J.-L. Lemaire, H. Baumgärtel, and S. Leach, J. Phys. Chem. A 1089-5639 106, 10908 (2002); P. C. Burgers, J. L. Holmes, and J. E. Szulejko, Int. J. Mass Spectrom. Ion Process. 0168-1176 10.1016/0168-1176(84)85172-1 57, 159 (1984); B. Ruscic, M. Schwarz, and J. Berkowitz, J. Chem. Phys. 91, 6772 (1989).
40. P. Aplincourt, C. Bureau, J.-L. Anthoine, and D. P. Chong, J. Phys. Chem. A 105, 7364 (2001).
41. U. Hergenhahn, A. Rüdel, K. Maier, A. M. Bradshaw, R. F. Fink, and A. T. Wen, Chem. Phys. 289, 57 (2003).
42. M. J. Frisch, G. W. Trucks, H. B. Schlegel, GAUSSIAN 98, Revision A.9, Gaussian, Inc., Pittsburgh, PA, 1998.