An ethics of expertise based on informed consent

Science and Engineering Ethics

Volumn 12, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 637-661

  Elliott, Kevin C ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA   (United States)

Author keywords

Carcinogens; Consent; Dissemination; Expertise; Hormesis; Publication

Indexed keywords

CARCINOGEN;

CONFERENCE PAPER; DECISION MAKING; ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH; ETHICS; HUMAN; INFORMATION DISSEMINATION; INFORMED CONSENT; MANAGEMENT; THEORETICAL MODEL; UNCERTAINTY;

CARCINOGENS; DECISION MAKING; ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH; HUMANS; INFORMATION DISSEMINATION; INFORMED CONSENT; MODELS, THEORETICAL; POLICY MAKING; UNCERTAINTY;

EID: 33845275358     PISSN: 13533452     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11948-006-0062-3     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (55)

1. Kitcher, P. (2001) Science, Truth, and Democracy. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
2. Pimple, K. (2002) Six Domains of Research Ethics: A Heuristic Framework for the Responsible Conduct of Research. Science and Engineering Ethics 8: 191-205.
3. Resnik, D. (1998) The Ethics of Science. Routledge, London.
4. Shrader-Frechette, K. (1994) The Ethics of Scientific Research. Rowman and Littlefield, Lanham, MD.
5. Hardwig, J. (1994) Toward an Ethics of Expertise, in: Wueste, D. ed. Professional Ethics and Social Responsibility. Rowman and Littlefield, Lanham, MD.
6. Resnik, D. (1996) Critical Study: Kristin Shrader-Frechette, Ethics of Scientific Research. Noûs 30: 133-143.
7. Segerstrale, U. (2001) Judging 'Good Science': Toward Cooperation between Scientists and Lawyers, in: Weil, V. ed. Trying Times: Science and Responsibilities after Daubert. CSEP & ISLAT, Chicago: 48-61.
8. Fiorino, D. (1990) Citizen Participation and Environmental Risk: A Survey of Institutional Mechanisms. Science, Technology, and Human Values 15: 226-243.
9. Shrader-Frechette, K. (1991), Risk and Rationality. University of California Press, Berkeley.
10. Shrader-Frechette, K. (1993) Consent and Nuclear Waste Disposal. Public Affairs Quarterly 1: 363-377.
11. Wigley, D. and K. Shrader-Frechette (1996) Environmental Justice: A Louisiana Case Study. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 9: 61-82.
12. th ed. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
13. Taylor, J. (2004) Autonomy and Informed Consent: A Much Misunderstood Relationship. Journal of Value Inquiry 38: 383-391.
14. National Research Council (1996) Understanding Risk: Informing Decisions in a Democratic Society. National Academy Press, Washington, D.C.
15. Turner, S. (2003) Liberal Democracy 3.0. SAGE Publications, London.
16. Faden, R. and T. Beauchamp (1986) A History and Theory of Informed Consent. Oxford University Press, New York.
17. May, T. (2002) Bioethics in a Liberal Society. The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.
18. Mazur, D. (2003) The New Medical Conversation. Rowman and Littlefield, Lanham, MD.
19. Wear, S. (1993) Informed Consent: Patient Autonomy and Physician Beneficence within Clinical Medicine. Kluwer, Dordrecht.
20. Longino, H. (2001) The Fate of Knowledge. Princeton University Press, Princeton.
21. Longino, H. (1990) Science as Social Knowledge. Princeton University Press, Princeton.
22. Solomon, M. (2001) Social Empiricism. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
23. Rowe, G. and L. Frewer (2000) Public Participation Methods: A Framework for Evaluation. Science, Technology, & Human Values 25: 3-29.
24. Wilkinson, T. (2001) Research, Informed Consent, and the Limits of Disclosure. Bioethics 15: 341-363.
25. Kitcher, P. (1985) Vaulting Ambition. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
26. Roth, A., Dunsby, J., and L. Bero (2003) Framing Processes in Public Commentary on US Federal Tobacco Control Regulation. Social Studies of Science 33: 7-44.
27. Shrader-Frechette, K. (1997) Hydrogeology and Framing Questions Having Policy Consequences. Philosophy of Science 64 (Supplement 1997): S149-S160.
28. Donnelly, M. (2002) Consent: Bridging the Gap Between Doctor and Patient. Cork University Press, Cork.
29. Gert, B., C. Culver, and K. Clouser (1997) Bioethics: A Return to Fundamentals. Oxford University Press, New York.
30. Friedberg, M., B. Saffran, T. Stinson, W. Nelson, and C. Bennett (1999) Evaluation of Conflict of Interest in Economic Analyses of New Drugs Used in Oncology. Journal of the American Medical Association 282(October 20): 1453-1457.
31. Krimsky, S. (2003) Science in the Private Interest. Rowman and Littlefield, Lanham, MD.
32. Colborn, T., D. Dumanoski, and J. Myers. (1996) Our Stolen Future. Dutton, New York.
33. Krimsky, S. (2000) Hormonal Chaos: The Scientific and Social Origins of the Environmental Endocrine Hypothesis. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.
34. Calabrese, E. and L. Baldwin (2003) Toxicology Rethinks Its Central Belief. Nature 421(13 February): 691-692.
35. Calabrese, E. and L. Baldwin (1998) Chemical Hormesis: Scientific Foundations. Texas Institute for the Advancement of Chemical Technology, College Station, TX.
36. Calabrese, E. and L. Baldwin (1997) The Dose Determines the Stimulation (and Poison): Development of a Chemical Hormesis Database. International Journal of Toxicology 16: 545-559.
37. Calabrese, E. and L. Baldwin (2001) The Frequency of U-Shaped Dose Responses in the Toxicological Literature. Toxicological Sciences 62: 330-338.
38. Calabrese, E. (2001) Overcompensation Stimulation: A Mechanism for Hermetic Effects. Critical Reviews in Toxicology 31: 425-470.
39. Crump, K. (2001) Evaluating the Evidence for Hormesis: A Statistical Perspective. Critical Reviews in Toxicology 31: 669-679.
40. Elliott, K. (2000) A Case for Caution: An Evaluation of Calabrese and Baldwin's Studies of Chemical Hormesis. Risk: Health, Safety, and Environment 11: 177-196.
41. Jonas, W. (2001) A Critique of 'The Scientific Foundations of Hormesis'. Critical Reviews in Toxicology 31: 625-629.
42. Menzie, C. (2001) Hormesis in Ecological Risk Assessment: A Useful Concept, a Confusing Term, and/or a Distraction? Human and Experimental Toxicology 20: 521-523.
43. Rodricks, J. (2003) Hormesis and Toxicological Risk Assessment. Toxicological Sciences 71: 134-136.
44. Gerber, L., G. Williams, and S. Gray (1999) The Nutrient-Toxin Dosage Continuum in Human Evolution and Modern Health. Quarterly Review of Biology 74: 273-289.
45. Kaiser, J. (2003) Sipping from a Poisoned Chalice. Science 302(17 October): 376-379.
46. Elliott, K. (2000) Conceptual Clarification and Policy-Related Science: The Case of Chemical Hormesis. Perspectives on Science 8: 346-366.
47. Vichi, P. and T. Tritton (1989) Stimulation of Growth in Human and Murine Cells by Adriamycin. Cancer Research 49: 2679-2682.
48. Roberts, S. (2001) Another View of the Scientific Foundations of Hormesis. Critical Reviews in Toxicology 31: 631-635.
49. Thayer, K., R. Melnick, K. Burns, D. Davis, and J. Huff (2005) Fundamental Flaws of Hormesis for Public Health Decisions. Enviromental Health Perspectives 113: 1271-1276.
50. Davis, J. M. and W. Farland. (1998) Biological Effects of Low-Level Exposures: A Perspective from U.S. EPA Scientists. Environmental Health Perspectives 106:380-381.
51. Renn, O. (2002) Hormesis and Risk Communication. BELLE Newsletter 11: 2-24.
52. Beder, S. (2000), Global Spin, rev. ed. Chelsea Green, White River Junction, VT.
53. nd ed. Common Courage Press, Monroe, ME.
54. Markowitz, G. and D. Rosner (2002) Deceit and Denial: The Deadly Politics of Industrial Pollution. University of California Press, Berkeley.
55. Wargo, J. (1996) Our Children's Toxic Legacy. Yale University Press, New Haven.