Ecologie des coléoptères saproxyliques dans les forêts de l’étage montagnard des Alpes du nord françaises

Annales de la Societe Entomologique de France

Volumn 42, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 231-243

  Dodelin, Benoît ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE SAVOIE   (France)

Author keywords

Deadwood; Functional ecology; Habitat; Mountain forest; Saproxylic Coleoptera

Indexed keywords

COLEOPTERA; FUNGI;

EID: 33845272529     PISSN: 00379271     EISSN: 21686351     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00379271.2006.10700626     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Barbalat, S., 1995. Efficacité comparée de quelques méthodes de piégeage sur certains coléoptères et influence de l‘anthophilie sur le résultat des captures. Bulletin de la Société neuchâteloise de Sciences Naturelles, 118:39–52.
2. Benick, L., 1952. Pilzkäfer und Käferpilze, ökologische und statistische Untersuchungen. Acta Zoologica Fennica, 70:1–250.
3. Bense, U., 1995. Longhorn beetles. Illustrated key to the Cerambycidae and Vesperidae of Europe, 512Weikersheim:Margraf Verlag.
4. Bouget, C., 2004. Chablis et diversité des coléoptères en forêt feuillue de plaine:impact à court terme de la trouée, de sa surface et de son contexte paysager, 451Thèse de doctorat, Cemagref–Muséum National d‘Histoire Naturelle.
5. Brustel, H., 2002. Coléoptères saproxyliques et valeur biologique des forêts françaises, 327Toulouse:Thèse de doctorat, Institut National Polytechnique.
6. Brustel, H., and Dodelin, B., 2005. “ Les coléoptères saproxyliques:Exigences biologiques et implications de gestion, p ”. In Bois mort et à cavités, une clé pour les forêts vivantes, Edited by:Vallauri, D., André, J., Dodelin, B., Eynard-Machet, R., and Rambaud, D., 126–134. Paris:Lavoisier. 405 p
7. Callot, H., 1995. Coléoptères des branchages et tiges mortes de taillis. Essai d‘inventaire en Alsace. Bulletin de la Société entomologique de Mulhouse 1995 (janv-mars),:1–10.
8. Carmona, M.R., Armesto, J.J., Aravena, J.C., and Pérez, C.A., 2002. Coarse woody debris biomass in successional and primary temperate forests in Chiloé Island, Chile. Forest Ecology and Management, 164:265–275.
9. Dajoz, R., 1966. Ecologie et biologie des Coléoptères xylophages de la hêtraie. Vie et milieu, 17:525–736.
10. Dajoz, R., 1998. Les insectes et la forêt, 594Paris:Lavoisier, Techniques et Documentation.
11. Dodelin, B., André, J., Wlérick, L., and Lempérière, G., 2004. Le bois mort en forêt de montagne (Alpes françaises). Revue Forestière Française, 66:507–518.
12. Ehnström, B., and Axelsson, R., 2002. [Insect traces in bark and wood], 512SLU, Uppsala:ArtDatabanken.
13. Graham, S.A., 1925. The felled trunk as an ecological unit. Ecology, 4:397–411.
14. Hammond, J.H.E., Langor, D.W., and Spence, J.R., 2001. Early colonization of Populus wood by saproxylic beetles (Coleoptera). Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 31:1175–1183.
15. Hammond, J.H.E., Langor, D.W., and Spence, J.R., 2004. Saproxylic beetles (Coleoptera) using Populus in boreal aspen stands of western Canada:Spatiotemporal variation and conservation of assemblages. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 34:1–19.
16. Jonsell, M., Weslien, J., and Ehnström, B., 1998. Substrate requirements of redlisted saproxylic invertebrates in Sweden. Biodiversity and Conservation, 7:749–764.
17. Kaila, L., Martikainen, P., and Punttila, P., 1997. Dead trees left in clear-cuts benefit saproxylic Coleoptera adapted to natural disturbances in boreal forest. Biodiversity and Conservation, 6:1–18.
18. Kolström, M., and Lumatjärvi, J., 2000. Saproxylic beetles on aspen in commercial forests:a simulation approach to species richness. Forest Ecology and Management, 126:113–120.
19. Lekander, B., Bejer-Petersen, B., Kangas, E., and Bakke, A., 1977. The distribution of bark beetles in the Nordic countries. Acta Entomologica Fennica, 32:1–36.
20. Lhoir, J., Fagot, J., Thieren, Y., and Gilson, G., 2003. Efficacité du piégeage, par les méthodes classiques, des Coléoptères saproxyliques en Région Wallonne (Belgique). Notes fauniques de Gembloux, 50:49–61.
21. Lindhe, A., Å, Lindelöw, and Åsenblad, N., 2005. Saproxylic beetles in standing dead wood-density in relation to substrate sun-exposure and diameter. Biodiversity and Conservation in press,:1–21.
22. Martikainen, P., 2000. Effects of forest management on beetle diversity, with implications for species conservation and forest protection, Joensuu:Thèse de doctorat. 26 + annexes p
23. Martikainen, P., and Kaila, L., 2004. Sampling saproxylic beetles:lessons from a 10-year monitoring study. Biological Conservation, 120:171–181.
24. Nikitsky, N.B., and Schigel, D.S., 2004. Beetles in polypores of the Moscow region:checklist and ecological notes. Entomologica Fennica, 15:6–22.
25. Økland, B., 1996. A comparison of three methods of trapping saproxylic beetles. European Journal of Entomology, 93:195–209.
26. Ozenda, P., 1985. La végétation de la chaîne alpine dans l‘espace montagnard européen, 344Paris:Masson.
27. Palm, T., 1951. Die Holz–und Rinden-käfer der nordschwedischen Laubbaüme. Meddelanden från Statens Skogforskningsinstitut, 40:1–242.
28. Palm, T., 1959. Die Holz- und Rinden-Käfer der süd- und mittelschwedischen Laubbaüme. Opuscula Entomologica suppl., 16:1–374.
29. Pfeffer, A., and Zumr, V., 1983. Communities of Coleoptera on the silver fir (Abies alba). Acta entomologica bohemoslovaca, 80:401–412.
30. Rehfous, M., 1955. Contribution à l’étude des insectes des Champignons. Bulletin de la Société entomologique Suisse, 28:1–114.
31. Saalas, U., 1917. [The spruce beetles of Finland I]. Annales Academiae Scientiarium Fennicae ser. A,:1–547.
32. Saalas, U., 1923. [The spruce beetles of Finland II]. Annales Academiae Scientiarium Fennicae ser. A,:1–746.
33. Schiegg, K., 2001. Saproxylic insect diversity of beech:limbs are richer than trunks. Forest Ecology and Management, 149:295–304.
34. Schnitzler-Lenoble, A., 2002. Ecologie des forêts naturelles d‘Europe, 271Paris:Techniques et Documentation.
35. Siitonen, J., Martikainen, P., Punttila, P., and Rauh, J., 2000. Coarse woody debris and stand characteristics in mature managed and old-growth boreal mesic forests in southern Finland. Forest Ecology and Management, 128:211–225.
36. Similä, M., Kouki, J., Martikainen, P., and Uotila, A., 2002. Conservation of beetles in boreal pine forests:the effects of forest age and naturalness on species assemblages. Biological Conservation, 106:19–27.
37. Sippola, A.-L., Siitonen, J., and Punttila, P., 2002. Beetle diversity in timberline forests:a comparison between old-growth and regeneration areas in Finnish Lapland. Annales zoologici Fennici, 39:69–86.
38. Speight, M.G., 1989. Les invertébrés saproxyliques et leur protection, 77Strasbourg:Conseilde l‘Europe.
39. Ståhl, G., Ringvall, A., and Fridman, J., 2001. Assessment of coarse woody debris–a methodological overview. Ecological Bulletin, 49:57–70.
40. Sverdrup-Thygeson, A., and Ims, R.A., 2002. The effect of forest clearcutting in Norway on the community of saproxylic beetles on aspen. Biological Conservation, 106:347–357.
41. Wiackowski, S., 1957. [The entomofauna of pine stumps in relation to the age and size of stump]. Ekologia Polska, seria A, 5:13–140.