Confidentiality in occupational medicine

Occupational Medicine - State of the Art Reviews

Volumn 17, Issue 4, 2002, Pages 617-623

  Mitchell, Clifford S ^a  

^a JOHNS HOPKINS BLOOMBERG SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONFIDENTIALITY; ETHICS; HEALTH INSURANCE; HUMAN; INFORMATION SYSTEM; LEGAL ASPECT; MEDICAL ETHICS; MEDICAL RECORD; OCCUPATIONAL MEDICINE; PHYSICIAN ATTITUDE; REVIEW; UNITED STATES;

CONFIDENTIALITY; ETHICS, MEDICAL; HEALTH INSURANCE PORTABILITY AND ACCOUNTABILITY ACT; HUMANS; INFORMATION MANAGEMENT; MEDICAL RECORDS; OCCUPATIONAL MEDICINE; PHYSICIAN'S ROLE; UNITED STATES;

EID: 33845269785     PISSN: 0885114X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (28)

1. American Medical Association: Principles of Medical Ethics. Chicago, AMA, 2001.
2. Annas GJ: Medical privacy and medical research - Judging the new Federal regulations. N Engl J Med 346:216-220, 2002.
3. Anon: ACOEM position on the confidentiality of medical information in the workplace. J Occup Environ Med 37:594-596, 1995.
4. Beauchamp TL, Childress JF: Professional-patient relationships. In Beauchamp TL and Childress JF (eds): Principles of Biomedical Ethics. New York, Oxford University Press, 1994, pp 395-462.
5. Brodkin CA, Frumkin H, Kirkland KH, et al: AOEC position paper on the organizational code for ethical conduct. J Occup Environ Med 38:869-881, 1996.
6. Cassidy SO, Sepulveda MJ: Health information privacy reform. J Occup Environ Med 37:605-614, 1995.
7. Draper E: Preventive law by corporate professional team players: Liability and responsibility in the work of company doctors. J Contemp Health Law Policy 15:525-607, 1999.
8. Ehrens D: Physician-patient privilege is preserved in workers' compensation proceedings: Morris v. Consolidated Coal Co. J Health Hosp Law 28:29-31, 1995.
9. Goodman KW: Codes of ethics in occupational and environmental health. J Occup Environ Med 38:882-883, 1996.
10. Gostin LO: National health information privacy: Regulations under the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act. JAMA 285:3015-3021, 2001.
11. Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996. Pub. L. No. 104-191, 110 Stat. 1936 (codified in scattered sections of U.S.C.) 1996.
12. Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996. P.L. No. 104-191 264(c)(1). 110 Stat. 1936, 2033, 1996.
13. International Commission on Occupational Health: International Code of Ethics for Occupational Health Professionals, 1-1996. Singapore, ICOH, 1996.
14. Johnston MB, Rober L: HIPAA becomes reality: Compliance with new privacy, security, and electronic transmission standards. W VA Law Rev 103:541-2001.
15. Kern DG: Confidentiality agreements and scientific independence. Med Decis Making 18:239-239, 1998.
16. Kulynych J, Korn D: The effect of the new Federal medical-privacy rule on research. N Engl J Med 346:201-204, 2002.
17. Laurie GT: Challenging medical-legal norms. The role of autonomy, confidentiality, and privacy in protecting individual and familial group rights in genetic information. J Leg Med 22:1-54, 2001.
18. Melton LJ: The threat to medical-records research. N Engl J Med 337:1466-1470, 1997.
19. Rischitelli DG: The confidentiality of medical information in the workplace. J Occup Environ Med 37:583-593, 1995.
20. Rothstein MA: A proposed revision of the ACOEM Code of Ethics. J Occup Environ Med 39:616-622, 1997.
21. Roush W: Publishing sensitive data: Who calls the shots? Science 276:523-524, 1997.
22. Schulte PA, Lomax GP, Ward EM, Colligan MJ: Ethical issues in the use of genetic markers in occupational epidemiologic research. J Occup Environ Med 41:639-646, 1999.
23. Starr P: Health and the right to privacy. Am J Law Med 25:193-201, 1999.
24. Teichman R. Wester MS: The new ACOEM Code of Ethical Conduct. J Occup Med 36:27-30, 1994.
25. Tilton SH: Right to privacy and confidentiality of medical records. Occup Med State Art Rev 11:17-29, 1996.
26. Tsai VW: Cheaper and better: The Congressional administrative simplification mandate facilitates the transition to electronic medical records. J Leg Med 19:4, 1998.
27. U.S. Dept of Health and Human Services: Standards for Privacy of Individually Identifiable Health Information; Final Rule. Fed Reg 65:82461-82510, 2000.
28. U.S. Dept of Health and Human Services: Protecting the Privacy of Patients' Health Information. Washington DC, DHHS, 2001.