User-defined atomicity constraint: A more flexible transaction model for reliable service composition

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 4260 LNCS, Issue , 2006, Pages 168-184

  Xiaoning, Ding ^a,b   Jun, Wei ^a   Tao, Huang ^a  

^a INSTITUTE OF SOFTWARE   (China)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CHINESE ACADEMY OF SCIENCES   (China)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHMS; COMPUTER SYSTEM RECOVERY; DATA REDUCTION; DATA STRUCTURES; INTERACTIVE COMPUTER SYSTEMS;

ATOMICITY CONSTRAINT; FAILURE RECOVERIES; SERVICE COMPOSITION; TRANSACTIONAL COMPOSITE SERVICE (TCS);

CONSTRAINT THEORY;

EID: 33845262055     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Yang FQ. Thinking on the development of software engineering technology. Journal of Software, 16(1): 1-7, 2005
2. Lu Jian, Tao Xianping, Ma Xiaoxing, et al., Research on Agent-Based Software Model for Internetware. Science in China, Series F-Information Sciences, 35(12): 1233-1253, 2005 9.
3. A. Zhang, M. Nodine, and B. Bhargava, Global Scheduling for Flexible Transactions in Heterogeneous Distributed Database Systems, IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 13(3):pp.439-450, 2001
4. J. Gray and A. Reuter, Transaction Processing: Concepts and Techniques, Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, San Mateo, California, 1993
5. Mohan C. Tutorial: Advanced Transaction Models Survey and Critique. In ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data, Minneapolis, 1994
6. P. Grefen, J. Vonk, E. Boertjes, and P. Apers, Semantics and Architecture of Global Transaction Support in Workflow Environments, In Proceedings of the Fourth IFCIS International Conference on Cooperative Information Systems, pp.348-359, Edinburgh, Scotland, September 2-4, 1999
7. P. F. Pires. WebTransact: A Framework For Specifying And Coordinating Reliable Web Services Compositions. Technical report ES-578/02, Coppe Federal University of Rio De Janeiro, Brazil, April 2002
8. Yi Ren, Quanyuan Wu, Yan Jia, et al., Transactional Business Coordination and Failure Recovery for Web Services Composition. GCC 2004, pp.26-33, 2004
9. IBM, BEA Systems, Microsoft, SAP AG, Siebel Systems. Business Process Execution Language for Web Services, version 1.1. http://www-128.ibm.com/ developerworks/library/specification/ws-bpel/, 2005
10. Microsoft, BEA and IBM. Web Services Transaction (WS-Transaction), http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/library/ws-transpec/., 2002
11. Oasis Committee. Business Transaction Protocol (BTP), Version1.0. http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/business-transactions/., 2002
12. D. Bunting et al. Web Services Transaction Management (WS-TXM) Version 1.0. Arjuna, Fujitsu, IONA, Oracle, and Sun, July 28, 2003
13. Marek Rusinkiewicz, Amit Sheth, Specification and execution of transactional workflows, Modern database systems: the object model, interoperability, and beyond, ACM Press/Addison-Wesley Publishing Co., New York, NY, 1995
14. Mansoor Ansari , Linda Ness, Marek Rusinkiewicz , Amit P. Sheth, Using Flexible Transactions to Support Multi-System Telecommunication Applications, Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Very Large Data Bases, pp.65-76, 1992
15. A. Elmagarmid, Y. Leu, W. Litwin, Marek Rusinkiewicz, A multidatabase transaction model for InterBase, Proceedings of the sixteenth international conference on Very large databases, pp.507-518, 1990
16. Sami Bhiri, Olivier Perrin, Claude Godait, Ensuring required failure atomicity of composite Web services, In Proceedings of the 14th international conference on World Wide Web(WWW '05), pp. 138-147, 2005
17. Thomas Mikalsen, Stefan Tai, and Isabelle Rouvello. Transactional Attitudes: Reliable Composition of Autonomous Web Services. International Conference on Dependable Systems and Networks (DSN 2002). 2002