Consensus or data-derived anatomical severity scoring?

Annual Proceedings - Association for the Advancement of Automotive Medicine

Volumn 2006, Issue , 2006, Pages 269-284

  Moore, Lynne ^a   Lavoie, André ^a   Le Sage, Natalie ^a   Bergeron, Eric ^b  

^a LAVAL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITÉ DE SHERBROOKE   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DATA REDUCTION; HOSPITALS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; REGRESSION ANALYSIS;

ANATOMIC INJURY SEVERITY; DATA-DERIVED SCORES; PHYSIOLOGICAL STATUS; UNIVARIATE MODELS;

PHYSIOLOGY;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CANADA; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONSENSUS; HUMAN; INJURY SCALE; MIDDLE AGED; PREDICTION AND FORECASTING; REGISTER; STATISTICAL MODEL;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; CONSENSUS; HUMANS; INJURY SEVERITY SCORE; LOGISTIC MODELS; MIDDLE AGED; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; QUEBEC; REGISTRIES;

EID: 33845255274     PISSN: 15400360     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (34)

1. American College of Surgeons Committee on Trauma. National Trauma Data Bank reference manual; 2004.
2. American College of Surgeons Committee on Trauma. National Trauma Data Bank, http://www.facs.org/trauma/ntdb.html; 2006.
3. Baker SP, O'Neill B. The injury severity score: an update. J Trauma 16(11): 882-5; 1976.
4. Bergeron E, Rossignol M, Osler T, et al. Improving the TRISS methodology by restructuring age categories and adding comorbidities. J Trauma 56(4): 760-7; 2004.
5. Champion HR, Copes WS, Sacco WJ, et al. A new characterization of injury severity. J Trauma 30(5): 539-45; discussion 545-6; 1990.
6. Champion HR, Sacco WJ, Copes WS, et al. A revision of the Trauma Score. J Trauma 29(5): 623-9; 1989.
7. Clarke JR, Ragone AV, Greenwald L, et al. Comparisons of survival predictions using survival risk ratios based on International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision and Abbreviated Injury Scale trauma diagnosis codes. J Trauma 59(3): 563-7; discussion 567-9; 2005.
8. Copes WS, Champion HR, Sacco WJ, et al. Progress in characterizing anatomic injury. J Trauma 30(10): 1200-7; 1990
9. Copes WS, Champion HR, Sacco WJ, et al. The Injury Severity Score revisited. J Trauma 28(1): 69-77; 1988.
10. Gabbe BJ, Magtengaard K, Hannaford AP, et al. Is the Charlson Comorbidity Index useful for predicting trauma outcomes? Acad Emerg Med 12(4): 318-2; 2005.
11. Hannan EL, Waller CH, Farrell LS, et al. A comparison among the abilities of various injury severity measures to predict mortality with and without accompanying physiologic information. J Trauma 58(2): 244-51; 2005.
12. Hastie T, Tibshirani R. Generalized additive models for medical research. Stat Methods Med Res 4(3): 187-96; 1995.
13. Hosmer DW, Lemeshow S. Applied logistic regression. New York, Wiley; 2002.
14. Kilgo PD, Meredith JW, Hensberry R, et al. A note on the disjointed nature of the injury severity score. J Trauma 57(3): 479-85; discussion 486-7; 2004.
15. Kilgo PD, Osler TM, Meredith W, et al. The worst injury predicts mortality outcome the best: rethinking the role of multiple injuries in trauma outcome scoring. J Trauma 55(4): 599-606; discussion 606-7; 2003.
16. MacKenzie EJ. Injury severity scales: overview and directions for future research. Am J Emerg Med 2(6): 537-49; 1984.
17. MacKenzie EJ, Steinwachs DM, Shankar B, et al. Classifying trauma severity based on hospital discharge diagnoses. Validation of an ICD-9CM to AIS-85 conversion table. Med Care 27(4): 412-22; 1989.
18. Marx WH, Simon HM, Jumbelic M, et al. Severity of injury is underestimated in the absence of autopsy verification. J Trauma 57(1): 46-9; discussion 49-50; 2004.
19. McGwin G, MacLennan PA, Fife JB, et al. Preexisting conditions and mortality in older trauma patients. J Trauma 56(6): 1291-6; 2004.
20. Meredith JW, Evans G, Kilgo PD, et al. A comparison of the abilities of nine scoring algorithms in predicting mortality. J Trauma 53(4): 621-8; discussion 628-9; 2002.
21. Meredith JW, Kilgo PD, Osler T. A fresh set of survival risk ratios derived from incidents in the National Trauma Data Bank from which the ICISS may be calculated. J Trauma 55(5): 924-32; 2003.
22. Meredith JW, Kilgo PD, Osler TM. Independently derived survival risk ratios yield better estimates of survival than traditional survival risk ratios when using the ICISS. J Trauma 55(5): 933-8; 2003.
23. Milzman DP, Boulanger BR, Rodriguez A, et al. Pre-existing disease in trauma patients: a predictor of fate independent of age and injury severity score. J Trauma 32(2): 236-43; discussion 243-4; 1992.
24. Moore L, Lavoie A, Camden S, et al. Statistical validation of the Glasgow Coma Score. J Trauma: In Press.
25. Moore L, Lavoie A, Le Sage N et al. Multiple imputation of the Glasgow Coma Score. J Trauma 59(3): 698-704; 2005.
26. Morris JA, MacKenzie EJ, Damiano AM, et al. Mortality in trauma patients: the interaction between host factors and severity. J Trauma 30(12): 1476-82; 1990
27. Morris JA, MacKenzie EJ, Edelstein SL. The effect of preexisting conditions on mortality in trauma patients. Jama 263(14): 1942-6; 1990.
28. Osler T, Baker SP, Long W. A modification of the injury severity score that both improves accuracy and simplifies scoring. J Trauma 43(6): 922-5; discussion 925-6; 1997.
29. Osler T, Rutledge R, Deis J, et al. ICISS: an international classification of disease-9 based injury severity score. J Trauma 41(3): 380-6; discussion 386-8; 1996.
30. Rutledge R. The Injury Severity Score is unable to differentiate between poor care and severe injury. J Trauma 40(6): 944-50; 1996.
31. Rutledge R., Osler T, Emery S, et al. The end of the Injury Severity Score (ISS) and the Trauma and Injury Severity Score (TRISS): ICISS, an International Classification of Diseases, ninth revision-based prediction tool, outperforms both ISS and TRISS as predictors of trauma patient survival, hospital charges, and hospital length of stay. J Trauma 44(1): 41-9; 1998.
32. Sacco WJ, MacKenzie EJ, Champion HR, et al. Comparison of alternative methods for assessing injury severity based on anatomic descriptors. J Trauma 47(3): 441-6; discussion 446-7; 1999.
33. Stephenson SC, Langley JD, Civil ID. Comparing measures of injury severity for use with large databases. J Trauma 53(2): 326-32; 2002.
34. Vining DJ, Gladish GW. Receiver operating characteristic curves: a basic understanding. Radiographies 12(6): 1147-54; 1992.