Perceptual differences in assessing the harm of patronizing adult entertainment clubs

International Journal of Public Opinion Research

Volumn 18, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 475-487

  Lo, Ven Hwei ^a   Wei, Ran ^b  

^a NATIONAL CHENGCHI UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33845252294     PISSN: 09542892     EISSN: 14716909     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/ijpor/edh107     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Aiken, L., Fenaughty, A., West, S., Johnson, J., & Luckett, T. (1995). Perceived determinants of risk for breast cancer and the relations among objective risk, perceived risk, and screening behavior over time. Womens Health, 1, 27-50.
2. Brosius, H. B., & Engel, D. (1996). The causes of third-person effects: Unrealistic optimism, impersonal impact, or generalized negative attitude toward media influence? International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 8, 142-162.
3. Chang, C. M. (1997). The social construction of sexual activities in Taiwan. Taipei: National Science Council Research Reports.
4. Chang, C. M., & Liu, C. D. (2003). Taipei citizens' perception and attitudes toward sex industry and sex trade. In Citizens' attitudes towards sex industry in Taipei and an analysis of sex trade policy I (pp. 1-290). Taipei Municipal Government Research Reports.
5. Chang, Y. H., & Fu, Y. C. (2002). The basic survey project of Taiwan's social change. Taipei: Academia Sinica.
6. Chapin, J. (2000). Third-person perception and optimistic bias among urban minority at-risk youth. Communication Research, 27, 51-81.
7. Chapin, J. (2001). Optimistic bias regarding campus violence. Current Research in Social Psychology, 6, 237-251.
8. Chapin, J. (2002). Third-person perception and school violence. Communication Research Reports, 19, 216-225.
9. Cheng, S. Y. (2000). The regulation of sex industry in Taipei. Taipei Municipal Government Research Reports.
10. Chiu, H. Y. (1991). The problem of prostitution and sex trade. In K. S. Yang & C. C. Yi (Eds.), Taiwan's social problems (pp. 431-492). Taipei: Chiuliu.
11. Davison, W. P. (1983). The third-person effect in communication. Public Opinion Quarterly, 47, 1-13.
12. Davison, W. P. (1996). The third-person effect revisited. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 8, 113-119.
13. Dines, G., Jensen, R., & Russo, A. (1998). Pornography: The production and consumption of inequality. New York: Routledge.
14. Donnerstein, E., Linz, D., & Penrod, S. (1987). The question of pornography: Research findings and policy implications. New York: Free Press.
15. Duck, J. M., & Mullin, B. (1995). The perceived impact of the mass media: Reconsidering the third-person effect. European Journal of Social Psychology, 25, 77-95.
16. Ellen, J., Boyer, C., Tschann, J., & Shafer, M. (1996). Adolescents perceived risk for STD and HIV infection. Journal of Adolescent Health, 18, 177-181.
17. Fontaine, K., & Smith, S. (1995). Optimistic bias in cancer risk perception: A cross-national study. Psychological Reports, 77, 143-146.
18. Furby, L., Fischhoff, B., & Morgan, M. (1991). Rape prevention and self-defense: At what price? Women's Studies International Forum, 14, 49-62.
19. Gunther, A. (1991). What we think others think. Communication Research, 18, 355-372.
20. Gunther, A. (1995). Overrating the X-rating: The third-person perception and support for censorship of pornography. Journal of Communication, 45(1), 27-38.
21. Gunther, A. C., & Mundy, P. (1993). Biased optimism and the third-person effect. Journalism Quarterly, 70, 58-67.
22. Gunther, A. C., & Storey, D. (2003). The influence of presumed influence. Journal of Communication, 53, 199-215.
23. Hansen, W., Raynor, A., & Wolkenstein, B. (1991). Perceived personal immunity to the consequences of drinking alcohol: The relationship between behavior and perception. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 14, 205-225.
24. Henriksen, L., & Flora, J. A. (1999). Third-person perception and children: Perceived impact of pro-and anti-smoking ads. Communication Research, 26, 643-665.
25. Hsu, C. C., & Chen, Y. S. (2003). An international comparative study of sex trade regulation. In Citizens' attitudes towards sex industry in Taipei and an analysis of sex trade policy I (pp. 232-393). Taipei Municipal Government Research Reports.
26. Hsu, H. Y., & Chen, C. Y. (2003). A comparative study of sex trade law. In Citizens' attitudes towards sex industry in Taipei and an analysis of sex trade policy II (pp. 1-232). Taipei Municipal Government Research Reports.
27. Hwang, S. L., & Bedford, O. (2003). Precursors and pathways to juvenile prostitution in Taiwan. Journal of Sex Research, 40, 201-210.
28. Lee, C., & Yang, S. (1996). Third-person perception and support for censorship of sexually explicit visual content: A Korean case. Paper presented at the Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication, Anaheim, CA.
29. Lo, V. H. (2000). Negative media content, social distance and third-person effect. Mass Communication Research, 65, 95-129.
30. Lo, V. H., & Paddon, A. R. (2001). Third-person effect, gender differences, pornography exposure and support for restrictions of pornography. Asian Journal of Communication, 7, 120-142.
31. Lo, V. H., & Wei, R. (2002). Third-person effect, gender and pornography on the Internet. Journal of Broadcasting Electronic Media, 46, 13-33.
32. McLeod, D. M., Eveland, W. P., & Nathanson, A. I. (1997). Support for censorship of violent and misogynic rap lyrics: An analysis of the third-person effect. Communication Research, 24, 153-174.
33. Mosher, D. L., & Maclan, P. (1994). College men and women respond to X-rated videos intended for male or female audiences: Gender and sexual scripts. Journal of Sex Research, 31, 99-113.
34. Paul, B., Salwen, M. B., & Dupagne, M. (2000). The third-person effect: A meta-analysis of the perceptual hypothesis. Mass Communication & Society, 3, 57-85.
35. Perloff, R. M. (1993). Third-person effect research, 1983-1992: A review and synthesis. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 5, 167-184.
36. Perloff, R. M. (1999). The third-person effect: A critical review and synthesis. Media Psychology, 1, 353-378.
37. Rojas, H., Shah, D., & Faber, R. J. (1996). For the good of others: Censorship and the third-person effect. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 8, 163-185.
38. Rucinski, D., & Salmon, C. (1990). The 'other' as the vulnerable voter: A study of the third-person effect in the 1988 U.S. presidential campaign. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 2, 345-368.
39. Salwen, M. B. (1998). Perceptions of media influence and support for censorship: The third-person effect in the 1996 presidential election. Communication Research, 25, 259-285.
40. Salwen, M. B., & Driscoll, P. D. (1997). Consequences of third-person perception in support of press restrictions in the O. J. Simpson trial. Journal of Communication, 47(2), 60-78.
41. Thiessen, D. (1994). Environmental tracking by females. Human Nature, 5, 167-202.
42. Thompson, M. E., Chaffee, S., & Oshagan, H. (1990). Regulating pornography: A public dilemma. Journal of Communication, 40(3), 73-83.
43. Tyler, T. & Cook, F. (1984). The mass media and judgments of risk: Distinguishing impact on personal and societal level judgments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47, 693-708.
44. Wang, S. J. (2000). An analysis of male sexuality. M. A. thesis, National Kaohsiang Normal University.
45. Weinstein, N. (1980). Unrealistic optimism about future life events. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 806-460.
46. Weinstein, N. (1984). Why it won't happen to me: Perceptions of risk factors and susceptibility. Health Psychology, 3, 431-457.
47. Weinstein, N. (1987). Unrealistic optimism about susceptibility to health problems: Conclusions from a community-wide sample. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 10, 481-500.
48. Weinstein, N., & Klein, W. (1996). Unrealistic optimism: Present and future. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 15, 1-8.
49. Williams, T., & Clarke, V. (1997). Optimistic bias in beliefs about smoking. Australian Journal of Psychology, 49, 106-112.
50. Wilson, W. C., & Abelson, H. I. (1973). Experience with and attitudes toward explicit sexual materials. Journal of Social Issues, 29, 19-39.
51. Yang, W. S. (2003). A quantitative study of Taipei citizens' perception and attitudes towards sex industry and sex trade. In Citizens' attitudes towards sex industry in Taipei and an analysis of sex trade policy I (pp. 291-430). Taipei Municipal Government Research Reports.
52. Yang, W. S., Yi, C. C., & Chiu, H. Y. (2003). A study of Taipei City Government's proposed regulation of sex industry and sex trade. In Citizens' attitudes towards sex industry in Taipei and an analysis of sex trade policy I (pp. 431-492). Taipei Municipal Government Research Reports.
53. Youn, S. F., Faber, R. J., & Shah, D. V. (2000). Restricting gambling advertising and the third-person effect. Psychology and Marketing, 17, 633-649.
54. Zillmann, D. (1998). Connections between sexuality and aggression (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
55. Zillmann, D., & Weaver, J. B. (1989). Pornography and men's sexual callousness toward women. In D. Zillmann & J. Bryant (Eds.), Pornography: Research advances & policy considerations (pp. 95-126). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.