Legal issues confronting the occupational physician

Occupational Medicine - State of the Art Reviews

Volumn 17, Issue 4, 2002, Pages 625-635

  Lewis, Kenneth S ^a   Kleper, Ann Louise ^a  

^a Lewis Davidson and Hetherington Ltd   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONFIDENTIALITY; CONFLICT OF INTEREST; DOCTOR PATIENT RELATION; ETHICS; HUMAN; LEGAL ASPECT; LEGAL LIABILITY; MEDICAL ETHICS; MEDICAL RECORD; OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH SERVICE; OCCUPATIONAL MEDICINE; PHYSICIAN ATTITUDE; REVIEW; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR; UNITED STATES;

CONFIDENTIALITY; CONFLICT OF INTEREST; ETHICS, MEDICAL; HUMANS; LIABILITY, LEGAL; MEDICAL RECORDS; OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH SERVICES; OCCUPATIONAL MEDICINE; PHYSICIAN'S ROLE; PHYSICIAN-PATIENT RELATIONS; SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY; UNITED STATES;

EID: 33845251829     PISSN: 0885114X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (14)

1. th ed. Philadelphia, Williams & Wilkins, 1990.
2. American Medical Association Principles of Medical Ethics. Adopted by the AMA House of Delegates June 17, 2001.
3. Privileged Communications, 98 Harvard L. Rev. 1450 (1985).
4. 735 ILCS 5/8-802.
5. Petrillo v. Syntex Laboratories, Inc., 102 Ill. Dec. 172, 148 Ill. App. 3d 581, 499 N.E.2d 952 (Ill. App. 1 Dist. 1986); Best v. Taylor Machine, Works, 179 Ill. 2d 367, 228 Ill. Dec. 636, 689 N.E.2d 1057 (1997).
6. Anderson v. Hydraulics, Inc., 97 WC 61260, 99 IIC 00093.
7. Brandt v. Medical Defense Associates, 856 S.W.2d 667 (Mo. bane 1993).
8. th 668.
9. Doe v. Roe, 588 N.Y.S.2d 236 (Supp. 1992).
10. Roth v. Kay, 35 Wash. App. 1, 664 P.2d 1299 (1983).
11. Langerstrom v. Dupre, 185 Ill. App. 3d 1020, 134 Ill. Dec. 73. 542 N.E.2d 73 (1989).
12. Heller v. Peekskill Community Hospital, 198 A.D.2d 265, 603 N.Y.S. 2d 548 (1993).
13. Hollowell v. Wilder Corp. of Delaware, 252 Ill. Dec. 839, 743 N.E.2d 707 (Ill. App. 5 Dist. 2001).
14. Barakat v. Matz, 208 Ill. Dec. 111, 648 N.E.2d 1033 (Ill. App. 1 Dist. 1995).