Changing role of SPI - Opportunities and challenges of process modeling

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 4257 LNCS, Issue , 2006, Pages 135-146

  Järvi, Antero ^a   Mäkilä, Tuomas ^a   Hakonen, Harri ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TURKU   (Finland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SIMULATION; COMPUTER SOFTWARE REUSABILITY; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; PROCESS ENGINEERING;

SOFTWARE PROCESS IMPROVEMENT (SPI); SOFTWARE PROCESS MODELING;

SOFTWARE ENGINEERING;

EID: 33845246164     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/11908562_13     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (22)

1. Object Management Group. Software Process Engineering Metamodel Specification - Version 1.1, January 5 2005. formal/05-01-06.
2. Alfonso Fuggetta. Software process: A roadmap. In ICSE - Future of SE Track, pages 25-34, 2000.
3. Reidar Conradi and Alfonso Fuggetta. Improving software process improvement. IEEE Software, 19(4):2-9, 2002.
4. CMMI Product Team. CMMI for systems engineering and software engineering (cmmi-se/sw, v1.1) - staged representation. Technical Report CMU/SEI-2002-TR-002, Software Engineering Institute, Pittsburgh, PA, USA, December 2001.
5. Philippe Kruchten. The Rational Unified Process: An Introduction (Second Edition). Addison-Wesley Professional, March 14 2000.
6. ISO/IEC, Geneva, Switzerland. ISO/IEC 12207, Information technology - Software life cycle processes, August 1 1995. ISO/IEC 12207:1995.
7. Alistair Cockburn. Selecting a projects methodology. IEEE Software, pages 64-71, July / August 2000.
8. Barry Boehm and Richard Turner. Balancing Agility and Discipline, A Guide for the Perplexed. Addison-Wesley, 2003.
9. Don Wells. Extreme programming: A gentle introduction. http://www.extremeprogramining.org/, 2006. Accessed on June 22 2006.
10. Msf homepage. http://msdn.microsoft.com/vstudio/teamsystem/msf/. Accessed on June 22 2006.
11. Backlund et al. Transfer of development process knowledge through method adaptation and implementation. In Proceedings of the 11th European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS 2003), June 2003.
12. The frameworks quagmire, http://www.software.org/quagmire/. Accessed on June 22 2006.
13. Christian Printzell Halvorsen and Reidar Conradi. A taxonomy to compare SPI frameworks. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 2077, 2001.
14. Eclipse process framework project homepage. http://www.eclipse.org/epf/. Accessed on June 22 2006.
15. Object Management Group. Business Process Modeling Notation Specification -Final Adopted Specification, 2006. dtc/06-02-01.
16. Knowledge Based Systems Inc. Integrated definition methods home page. http://www.idef.com/. Accessed on June 22 2006.
17. Becker et al., editor. Process Management - A Guide for the Design of Business Processes. Springer, 2003.
18. John Davenport. Don't write another process. Methods & Tools, 12(3):2-14, 2004.
19. Antero Järvi and Tuomas Mäkilä. Observations on modeling software processes with SPEM process components. In Proceedings of The 9th Symposium on Programming Languages and Software Tools, Tartu, Estonia, 2005.
20. Bob McFeeley. IDEAL: A Users Guide for Software Process Improvement. Software Engineering Institute, Pittsburg, PA, February 1996. CMU/SEI-96-HB-001.
21. Nathan Baddoo and Tracy Hall. De-motivators for software process improvement: an analysis of practitioners' views. The Journal of Systems and Software, 66:23-33, 2003.
22. Nathan Baddoo and Tracy Hall. Motivators for software process improvement: an analysis of practitioners' views. The Journal of Systems and Software, 62:85-96, 2002.