Polysensitivity in fixed drug eruption due to a novel drug combination-independent lesions due to piroxicam and cotrimoxazole [11]

European Journal of Dermatology

Volumn 16, Issue 5, 2006, Pages 591-592

  Özkaya, Esen ^a  

^a ISTANBUL UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COTRIMOXAZOLE; DICLOFENAC POTASSIUM; NAPROXEN; PIROXICAM; PIROXICAM BETA CYCLODEXTRIN; TENOXICAM;

ADULT; ANAMNESIS; CASE REPORT; CLINICAL EXAMINATION; CLINICAL FEATURE; DRUG SENSITIVITY; DRUG WITHDRAWAL; FIXED DRUG ERUPTION; HAND PALM; HEADACHE; HUMAN; LETTER; MALE; PATCH TEST; PROVOCATION TEST; SKIN DEFECT;

ADULT; ANTI-INFECTIVE AGENTS; ANTI-INFLAMMATORY AGENTS, NON-STEROIDAL; DRUG ERUPTIONS; DRUG HYPERSENSITIVITY; DRUG INTERACTIONS; DRUG THERAPY, COMBINATION; HAND; HUMANS; MALE; PATCH TESTS; PIROXICAM; TRIMETHOPRIM-SULFAMETHOXAZOLE COMBINATION;

EID: 33845235881     PISSN: 11671122     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Letter

References (7)

1. Ozkaya-Bayazit E, Bayazit H, Ozarmagan G. Drug related clinical pattern in fixed drug eruption. Eur J Dermatol 2000; 10: 288-91.
2. Bhargava NC, Singh G. Fixed eruptions due to two unrelated drugs. Int J Dermatol 1981; 20: 435.
3. Walfish AE, Sapadin AN. Fixed drug eruption due to doxycycline and metronidazole. Cutis 2002; 69: 207-8.
4. Bharija SC, Belhaj MS. Fixed drug eruption on three independent sites induced by three chemically unrelated drugs. Dermatologica 1990; 181: 237-9.
5. Ozkaya E. Independent lesions of fixed drug eruption caused by trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole and tenoxicam in the same patient: a rare case of polysensitivity. J Am Acad Dermatol 2004; 51(2 Suppl): S102-4.
6. Ordoqui E, De Barrio M, Rodriguez VM, Herrero T, Gil PJ, Baeza ML. Cross-sensitivity among oxicams in piroxicam-caused fixed drug eruption: two case reports. Allergy 1995; 50: 741-4.
7. Ikezawa Z, Kitamura K, Osawa J, Hariya T. Photosensitivity to piroxicam is induced by sensitization to thimerosal and thiosalicylate. J Invest Dermatol 1992; 98: 918-22.