Evaluating quality of conceptual models based on user perceptions

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 4215 LNCS, Issue , 2006, Pages 54-67

  Maes, Ann ^a   Poels, Geert ^a  

^a GHENT UNIVERSITY   (Belgium)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SELECTION AND EVALUATION; DATA REDUCTION; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; STUDENTS; USER INTERFACES;

CONCEPTUAL MODELS; EVALUATION FRAMEWORK; HUMAN FACTORS RESEARCH; USER PERCEPTIONS;

INFORMATION RETRIEVAL SYSTEMS;

EID: 33845231702     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/11901181_6     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (32)

1. Basili, V., Shull, F. and Lanubile, F. (1999). Building Knowledge through Families of Experiments. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering. 25(4), 456-473.
2. Bodart, F., A. Patel, M. Sim, and R. Weber (2001). Should Optional Properties Be Used in Conceptual Modelling? A Theory and Three Empirical Tests. Information Systems Research, 12, 4 (December), 384-405.
3. Bollen, K. (1989). Structural Equations with Latent Variables, John Wiley & Sons, NY.
4. Burton-Jones, A. and Weber, R. (1999). Understanding Relationships with Attributes in Entity-Relationship Diagrams. Proc. of the 20th International Conference on Information Systems, 214-228.
5. Davis, F. (1989). Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319-339.
6. DeLone, W.H. and McLean, E.R. (1992). Information Systems Success: The Quest for the dependent variable. Information Systems Journal, 3(1), 60-95.
7. DeLone, W.H. and McLean, E.R. (2003). The DeLone and McLean model of information systems success: A ten-year update. Journal of Management Information Systems, 19(4), 9-30.
8. Diamantopoulos, A. and Winklhofer H.M. (2001). Index Construction with Formative Indicators: An Alternative to Scale Development. Journal of Marketing Research, 38(2), 269-277.
9. Dunn, C.L. and Grabski, S.V. (2000). Perceived semantic expressiveness of accounting systems and task accuracy effects. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, 1(2), 79-87.
10. Dunn, C.L. and Grabski, S.V. (2001). An investigation of localization as an element of cognitive fit in accounting model representations. Decision Science, 32(1), 55-94.
11. Fornell, C. and Larcker, D.F. (1981). Evaluating Structural Equation Models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of marketing research 18(1), 39-50
12. Gemino, A and Wand, Y. (2003) Foundations for Empirical Comparisons of Conceptual Modeling Techniques. In D. Batra, J. Parsons, and E. Ramesh (eds.), Proc. of the Second Annual Symposium on Research in Systems Analysis and Design, Miami, Florida.
13. Gemino, A. and Wand, Y. (2005). Complexity and Clarity in Conceptual Modeling: Comparison of Mandatory and Optional Properties. Data and Knowledge Engineering, 55(3), 301-328.
14. Hair, J.F., Anderson R.E. and Tatham R.L. (1987). Multivariate Data Analysis, 2nd ed.
15. Hulland, John (1999). Use of Partial Least Squares (PLS) in strategic management research: A review of four recent studies. Strategic Management Journal, 20(2), 195-204.
16. Krogstie, J., Lindland, O.I., Sindre, G. (1995). Defining quality aspects for conceptual models. In E. D. Falkenberg, W. Hesse, and A. Olive (eds.), Proc. of the 3rd IFIP8.1 Working Conference on Information Systems. Marburg, Germany, 216-231.
17. Lindland, O.I., Sindre, G., Sølvberg, A. (1994). Understanding Quality in Conceptual Modeling. IEEE Software, 11(2), 42-49.
18. Moody, D.L (2001). Dealing with Complexity: A practical Method for representing Large Entity Relationship Models, Doctoral Dissertation, University of Melbourne.
19. Moody, D.L. (2005). Theoretical and Practical Issues in Evaluating the Quality of Conceptual Models: Current state and Future directions. Data and Knowledge Engineering, 55(3), 243-276.
20. Moore, G.C. and Benbasat I. (1991). Development of an Instrument to Measure the Perceptions of Adopting and Information Technology Innovation. Information Systems Research 2(3), 192-222.
21. Nelson, R. R., Todd, P. A., Wixom, B. H. (2005). Antecedents of Information and System Quality: An Empirical Examination Within the Context of Data Warehousing. Journal of Management Information Systems, 21(4), 199-235.
22. Parsons J. and Cole L. (2005). What do the pictures mean? Guidelines for the experimental evaluation of representation fidelity in diagrammatical conceptual modeling techniques. Data & Knowledge Engineering, 55(3), 327-342.
23. Poels, G., Nelson, J., Genero, M., Piattini, M. (2003). Quality in Conceptual Modeling. New Research Directions. Lecture Notes in Computer Science 2784, 243-250.
24. Poels, G., Maes, A., Gailly, F., Paemeleire, R., (2005). Measuring the Perceived Semantic Quality of Information Models. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 3770, 376-385.
25. Rai, A., Lang, S.S., Welker, R.B. (2002). Assessing the validity of IS success models: An empirical test and theoretical analysis. Information Systems Research, 13(1), 50-69.
26. Seddon, P. (1997). A Respecification and Extension of the DeLone and McLean Model of IS Success. Information Systems Research, 8(3), 240-253.
27. Seddon, P. and Kiew, M.-Y.(1994). A partial test and development of the DeLone and McLean model of IS success. In J.I. DeGross, S.L. Huff, and M.C Munro (eds,). Proceedings of the International Conference on Information Systems. Atlanta. 99-110.
28. Seddon, P. and Yip, S.-K. (1992). An Empirical Evaluation of User Information Satisfaction (UIS) Measures for Use with General Ledger Accounting Software. Journal of Information Systems, 6(1), 75-92.
29. Shanks, G., Tansley, E., Weber, R. (2003). Using ontology to validate conceptual models. Communications of the ACM, 46(10), 85-89.
30. Shannon, C.E. and Weaver, W. (1949). The Mathematical theory of Communication. University of Illinois Press, Urbana.
31. Siau, K., Wand, Y., Benbasat, I. (1997). The Relative Importance of Structural Constraints and Surface Semantics in Information Modeling. Information Systems, 22(2/3), 155-170.
32. Topi, H. and Ramesh, V. (2002). Human Factors Research on Data Modeling: A Review of Prior Research, An Extended Framework and Future Research Directions. Journal of Database Management, 13(2), 3-19.