Experimental research on conceptual modeling: What should we be doing and why?

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 4215 LNCS, Issue , 2006, Pages 544-547

  Poels, Geert ^a   Burton Jones, Andrew ^b   Gemino, Andrew ^c   Parsons, Jeffrey ^d   Ramesh, V ^e  

^a GHENT UNIVERSITY   (Belgium)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

^c SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^d MEMORIAL UNIVERSITY OF NEWFOUNDLAND   (Canada)

^e INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SCIENCE; COMPUTER SIMULATION; INTELLIGENT AGENTS;

CONCEPTUAL MODELING;

MATHEMATICAL MODELS;

EID: 33845227913     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/11901181_40     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (5)

1. Bodart, F., Sim, M., Patel, A., Weber, R.: Should Optional Properties be Used in Conceptual Modeling? A Theory and Three Empirical Tests. Information Systems Research. 12(4) (2001) 384-405
2. Burton-Jones, A. and Meso, P.: Conceptualizing Systems for Understanding: An Empirical Test of Decomposition Principles in Object-Oriented Analysis. Information Systems Research, 17(1) (2006), 38-60.
3. Gemino, A., Wand, Y.: A Framework for Empirical Evaluation of Conceptual Modeling Techniques. Requirements Engineering. 9 (2004) 248-260
4. Khatri, V., Vessey, I., Ramesh, V., Clay, P., Park, S.-J.: Understanding Conceptual Schemas: Exploring the Role of Application and IS Domain Knowledge. Information Systems Research. 17(1) (2006) 81-99
5. Parsons, I., Cole, L. What Do the Pictures Mean? Guidelines for Experimental Evaluation of Representational Fidelity in Diagrammatical Conceptual Modeling Techniques. Data and Knowledge Engineering. 55(3) (2005) 327-342