Oasis: An overlay-aware network stack

Operating Systems Review (ACM)

Volumn 40, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 41-48

  Madhyastha, Harsha V ^a   Venkataramani, Arun ^a   Krishnamurthy, Arvind ^a   Anderson, Thomas ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

NETWORK STACKS; PACKET CAPTURE; PACKET DELIVERY SERVICES; TOOLKITS;

CODES (SYMBOLS); COMPUTER OPERATING SYSTEMS; INFORMATION SERVICES; INTERFACES (COMPUTER); PACKET NETWORKS;

DISTRIBUTED COMPUTER SYSTEMS;

EID: 33845220273     PISSN: 01635980     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1113361.1113371     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Akamai, inc. home page. www.akamai.com.
2. A. Akella, J. Pang, B. Maggs, S. Seshan, and A. Shaikh. A comparison of overlay routing and multihoming route control. In ACM SIGCOMM, pages 93-106, New York, NY, USA, 2004.
3. D. Andersen, H. Balakrishnan, M. Kaashoek, and R. Morris. Resilient overlay networks. In SOSP, pages 131-145. ACM Press, 2001.
4. T. Anderson, L. Peterson, S. Shenker, and J. Turner. Overcoming the Internet impasse through virtualization. Computer, 38(4):34-41, 2005.
5. K. Argyraki and D. Cheriton. Loose source routing as a mechanism for traffic policies. In Proc. of FDNA, 2004.
6. H. Ballani and P. Francis. Towards a global ip anycast service. SIGCOMM Comput. Commun. Rev., 35(4):301-312, 2005.
7. Bittorrent home page. www.bittorrent.com.
8. Y. Chen, D. Bindel, H. Song, and R. H. Katz. An algebraic approach to practical and scalable overlay network monitoring. SIGCOMM Comput. Commun. Rev., 34(4):55-66, 2004.
9. H. Eriksson. MBone: The Multicast Backbone. Communications of the ACM, 37(8):54-60, Aug. 1994.
10. M. Freedman, E. Freudenthal, and D. Mazi. Democratizing content publication with coral, 2004.
11. K. P. Gummadi, H. V. Madhyastha, S. D. Gribble, H. M. Levy, and D. Wetherall. Improving the reliability of internet paths with one-hop source routing. In USENIX OSDI, pages 183-198, 2004.
12. S. Gupta and A. L. M. Reddy. A client oriented, ip level redirection mechanism. In Proceedings of IEEE Infocom, 1999.
13. Internet protocol v4 address space.
14. D. Joseph, J. Kannan, A. Kubota, K. Lakshminarayanan, I. Stoica, and K. Wehrle. Ocala: An architecture for supporting legacy applications over overlays. Technical Report UCB/CSD-005-1397, UC Berkeley, EECS, 2005.
15. Kazaa home page. www.kazaa.com.
16. A. Keromytis, V. Misra, and D. Rubenstein. Sos: Secure overlay services, 2002.
17. A. Nakao, L. Peterson, and M. Wawrzoniak. A divert mechanism for service overlays. Technical Report TR-668-03, Computer Science Department, Princeton, Feb. 2003.
18. Pcusa ndis tutorial. www.pcausa.com/pcasim/packetredir.htm.
19. T. S. E. Ng, I. Stoica, and H. Zhang. A waypoint service approach to connect heterogeneous internet address spaces. In USENIX Technical Conf., 2001.
20. P. Patel, A. Whitaker, D. Wetherall, J. Lepreau, and T. Stack. Upgrading transport protocols using untrusted mobile code. In SOSP, October 2003.
21. P. J. R. Moskowitz, P. Nikander and T. Henderson. Host identity protocol, 2003.
22. S. Ratnasamy, S. Shenker, and S. McCanne. Towards an evolvable internet architecture. In In ACM SIGCOMM, 2005.
23. P. Rodriguez, S. Mukherjee, and S. Rangarajan. Session level techniques for improving web browsing performance on wireless links. In WWW, 2004.
24. S. Savage, T. Anderson, A. Aggarwal, D. Becker, N. Cardwell, A. Collins, E. Hoffman, J. Snell, A. Vahdat, G. Voelker, and J. Zahorjan. Detour: a case for informed Internet routing and transport. IEEE Micro, 19, No. 1:50-59, January 1999.
25. S. Savage, N. Cardwell, D. Wetherall, and T. Anderson. TCP congestion contorl with a misbehaving receiver. Computer Communication Review, 29(5), 1999.
26. I. Stoica, D. Adkins, S. Zhuang, S. Shenker, and S. Surana. Internet indirection infrastructure. IEEE/ACM Trans. Netw., 12(2):205-218, 2004.
27. G. Su. MOVE: Mobility with Persistent Network Connections. PhD thesis, Columbia University, Oct. 2004.
28. G. Su and J. Nieh. Mobile communication with virtual network address translation. Technical Report CUCS-003-02, Columbia University, Feb. 2002.
29. L. Subramanian, I. Stoica, H. Balakrishnan, and R. H. Katz. OverQoS: Offering Internet QoS using overlays. In NSDI, 2004.
30. D. Tennenhouse and D. Wetherall. Towards an Active Network Architecture. In Computer Communication Review, 1996.
31. F. Teraoka, Y. Yokote, and M. Tokoro. A network architecture providing host migration transparency. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGCOMM '88 Conference on Applications, Technologies, Architectures, and Protocols for Computer Communication, 1991.
32. J. Touch, Y. Wang, L. Eggert, and G. Finn. Virtual internet architecture. Technical Report ISI-TR-2003-570, Information Sciences Institute (ISI), March 2003.
33. A. Vahdat, T. Anderson, and M. Dahlin. Active Naming: Programmable Location and Transport of Wide-area Resources, Aug. 1999.
34. M. Walfish, J. Stribling, and M. Krohn. Middleboxes no longer considered harmful. In OSDI, 2004.
35. P. Yalagandula, A. Garg, M. Dahlin, L. Alvisi, and H. Vin. Transparent mobility with minimal infrastructure. Technical Report TR-01-30, UT Austin, June 2001.
36. X. Yang, D. Wetherall, and T. E. Anderson. A dos-limiting network architecture. In SIGCOMM, 2005.
37. M. Zhang, J. Lai, A. Krishnamurthy, L. Peterson, and R. Wang. A transport layer approach for improving end-to-end performance and robustness using redundant paths. In USENIX Annual Technical Conference, June 2004.
38. S. Zhuang, K. Lai, I. Stoica, R. Katz, and S. Shenker. Host mobility using an internet indirection infrastructure. In Proc. of Mobisys, 2003.