Wing-in-ground effect vehicles

Progress in Aerospace Sciences

Volumn 42, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 211-283

  Rozhdestvensky, Kirill V ^a  

^a ST PETERSBURG STATE MARINE TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY   (Russian Federation)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AERODYNAMICS; AIR CUSHION VEHICLES; BIBLIOGRAPHIES; CLASSIFICATION (OF INFORMATION); INDUSTRIAL ECONOMICS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; MOTION CONTROL; RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT MANAGEMENT; STRUCTURAL DESIGN;

GROUND EFFECT (GE); LONGITUDINAL MOTION; WING-IN-GROUND EFFECT TECHNOLOGY;

WINGS;

EID: 33845218948     PISSN: 03760421     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.paerosci.2006.10.001     Document Type: Review

References (122)

1. Rozhdestvensky K.V. Ekranoplans-the GEMs of fast water transport. Trans Inst Mar Eng, London 109 Part 1 (1997) 47-74
2. Reeves JML. The case for surface effect research, platform applications and development opportunities. NATO-AGARD fluid mechnics panel (FMP) symposium in long range and long range endurance operation of aircraft, session 1A, paper no. 4, 24-27 May 1993.
3. Rozhdestvensky KV. Aerodynamics of a lifting system in extreme ground effect. Heidelberg: Springer, 2000. p. 352.
4. Belavin NI. Letauschie Suda-ekranoplany. Katera i Yakhty no. 15, 1968.
5. Hooker S. Wingships: prospect for high-speed oceanic transport, Jane's all the world's surface skimmers, 1982.
6. Hooker S. A review of current technical knowledge necessary to develop large scale wing in surface effect craft. In: Intersociety advanced marine vehicles conference, Arlington, VA, Also AIAA paper 89-1497-CP 5-7 June 1989. p. 367-429.
7. Kaario TJ. The principles of ground effect vehicles. In: The Symposium on ground effect phenomena, Princeton University, October 1959.
8. Wingship investigation, ARPA report, vols. 1 and 3, Arlington, 1993.
9. Jörg GW. History and development of the 'aerodynamic ground effect craft' (AGEC) with tandem wings. In: Proceedings of the symposium "ram wing and ground effect craft". London: Royal Aeronautical Society; 19 May 1987. p. 87-109.
10. Ando S, Miyashita J, Terai K. Design philosophies and test results of two-seated experimental simple ram wing with side floats. Kawasaki review no. 14, March 1964. p. 3-34 (in Japanese).
11. Kirillovykh VN.Russian ekranoplans. In: Proceedings of the international workshop on twenty-first century flying ships. Sydney, Australia: University of New South Wales; 7-9 November 1995. p. 71-117.
12. Maskalik AI, et al. ekranoplans: peculiarities of theory and design, St. Petersburg, Sudostroenie, 2000. 320c.
13. Rozhdestvensky K.V., and Sinitsyn D.N. State of the art and perspectives of development of ekranoplans in Russia. FAST 93 2 (1993) 1657-1670
14. Sinitsyn DN, Maskalik AI. The ekranoplan is a new type of high speed water transport which can be used in all seasons. In: Proceedings of the international workshop ekranoplans and very fast craft. Sydney, Australia: The University of New South Wales; 5-6 December 1996. p. 152-62.
15. Ming LS, Xai LK, Hua YC, Bo N, Nai YX. Development of wing-in-ground-effect at CSSRC. In: Proceedings of the international workshop ekranoplans and very fast craft. Sydney, Australia: The University of New South Wales; 5-6 December 1989. p. 244-57.
16. Li Kaixi, Ni Bo.Design and trial of the new WIG effect craft XTW-4. In: Proceedings of the 3rd international conference for high performance marine vehicles-HMPV'2000, Shanghai, 19-23 April 2000. p. 16-9.
17. In: S.J. Phillips, editor. Jane's high-speed marine transportation, 35th ed., 2002-2003.
18. Liang Y, Guihua P, Younong X, Jun S, Chenjie W. Research and design of dynamic aircushion wing in ground effect craft (DACWIG) type 'SWAN". In: Proceedings of the 3rd international conference for high performance marine vehicles-HMPV'2000, Shanghai, 19-23 April 2000. p. 36-52.
19. Fischer H, Matjasic K. From Airfisch to Hoverwing. In: Proceedings of the international workshop WISE up to ekranoplan GEMs. Sydney, Australia: The University of New South Wales; 15-16 June 1998. p. 69-89.
20. Fischer H, Matjasic K. Hoverwing-technology: bridge between WIG and ACV from Airfish. In: Proceedings of the symposium on Fluid dynamics problems of vehicles operating near or in the air-sea interface. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Research and Technology Organization; 5-8 October 1998.
21. Ebert J, Meyer M. Hydrowing-a new efficient wing-in-ground effect craft. In: Proceedings of the international workshop WISE up to ekranoplan GEMs. Sydney, Australia: The University of New South Wales; 15-16 June 1998. p. 267-273.
22. Sinitsin DN, Maskalik AI. Amphistar-first civilian ekranoplan. St. Petersburg: Sudostroenie Publishers; 2000. p. 110.
23. Kirillovikh VN, Privalov EI. Transport amphibious platforms: a new type of high-speed craft". In: Proceedings of the workshop "ekranoplans and very fast craft". Sydney, Australia: The University of New South Wales; 5-6 December 1996. p. 121-33.
24. Bennett A. Presentation on Lockheed Martin SEA concept. In: RTO/AVT symposium and specialists' meetings, Loen, Norway, 7-11 May 2001.
25. Boeing frontiers (online), vol. 01, issue 05, September 2002.
26. Van Beek CM, Oskam B, Fantacci G. Progress report on aerodynamic analysis of a surface piercing hydrofoil-controlled wing-in-ground effect seabus configuration. In: Proceedings of the symposium on fluid dynamics problems of vehicles operating near or in the air-sea interface. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Research and Technology Organization, 5-8 October 1998.
27. Gazuit G, Goupil Y. Hydrofret concept. In: Proceedings of the EuroAvia ground effect symposium EAGES 2001, SUPAERO, Toulouse, 12-15 June 2001. p. 235-46.
28. Doctors LJ. Analysis of the efficiency of an ekranocat: a very-high-speed catamaran with aerodynamic alleviation. In: Proceedings of the international conference on wing-in ground effect craft, London, Paper no. 15, 4 and 5 December 1997.
29. Gallington RW. Power augmentation on ram wings. In: Proceedings of the symposium 'ram wing and ground effect craft'. London: The Royal Aeronautical Society; 19 May 1987. p. 57-86.
30. Kubo S., Matsuoka T., and Kawamura T. Development of a wing in ground effect craft marine slider: μ-SKY 1 as a high speed marine boat. In: 4th Pacific congress on marine sciences and technology 11 (1990) 220-227
31. Kubo S, Matsubara T, Higashia A, Yamaguchi N, Kawamura T, Matuoka T, et al. Development of wing in surface effect craft, Marine slider μ-Sky 2 as a high speed boat for sports and pleasures. In: International marine systems design conference, May 1991. p. 155-9.
32. Akimoto H, Kubo S, Fukushima K, Fukushima M. Development of a new wing-in-surface-effect craft for 8 passengers. In: Proceedings of FAST2001, Southhampton, UK, 2001. p. 6.
33. Akimoto H, Kubo S, Tanaka M, Sakumasu M. Self-propulsion model test of a wing-insurface effect ship with canard configuration, Part 2. In: Proceedings of the 8th international conference on fast sea transportation (FAST 2005), St. Petersburg, Russia, 27-30 June 2005.
34. De Keyser LJ. A high-inertia slowed overhead rotor as take off aid ensures an unequaled level of safety in the operation of wing-in-ground effect (WIG) craft. In: Proceedings of the 8th international conference on fast sea transportation (FAST 2005), St. Petersburg, Russia, 27-30 June 2005.
35. Kang CG. Introduction to large WIG craft project. In: Proceedings of the 1st international symposium on WIG crafts. Seoul, Korea: Sofitel Ambassador; 8 November 2005. p. 77-84.
36. Volkov LD, Ponomarev AV, Treschevski VN, Yushin VI. Results of aerodynamic research carried out in Krylov institute in support of design of ekranoplans. In: Proceedings of the second international conference on high speed ships, 1992.
37. Denissov VI. Search and rescue ekranoplan SPASATEL, Sudostroenie J 1995; 1: 10-2.
38. Aframeev EA. Conceptual bases of WIG craft building: ideas, reality and outlooks. In: Proceedings of the symposium on "fluid dynamics problems of vehicles operating near or in the air-sea interface". Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Research and Technology Organization; 5-8 October 1998.
39. Nebylov AV, Sokolov VV, Tomita N, Ohkami Y. The concept of ekranoplane use for passenger aerospace plane launch and landing, transport: science, engineering, management. No. 11, 1996 (in Russian).
40. Nebylov AV, Tomita N. Optimization of motion control at landing of aerospace plane on ekranoplan. In: 36th AIAA aerospace sciences meeting and exhibit, Reno, USA, 1998.
41. Kubo S. Proposed operation of Orlyonok between Japan and Russia. In: Paper presented at the 2nd international conference on ekranoplans, Nizhniy Novgorod, 1994. p. 5.
42. Sommer, G. Ekranoplan: The Soviet sea monster. In: Proceedings of the Institute of Naval Engineers, October 1988. p. 144-5.
43. Irodov R.D. Criteria of longitudinal stability of ekranoplan. Ucheniye Zapiski TSAGI, Moscow 1 4 (1970) 63-74
44. Rozhdestvensky KV. Oscillations of a wing in a gas flow close to a wall and acoustic resonance. Trudy Irkutskogo Universiteta, Asimptoticheskie Metody v Dinamike Sistem, 1982. p. 117-28.
45. Lippisch A.M. Der 'Aerodynamische Boden Effekt' und der Entwicklung des Flugflaschen (Aerofoil) Bootes. Luftfahttechnik-Raumfahrttechnik 10 (1964) 261-269
46. Fischer H. Airfoil boat technique explained on X-113 and X-114. In: International high performance vehicle conference, November 1988. p. 1-19.
47. Bogdanov AI. The problems of ekranoplan certification. Conception and development of IMO safety requirements. In: Proceedings of the international workshop ekranoplans-flying ships of the 21st century held at the University of New South Wales, 7-9 November 1995. p. 128-47.
48. Zhukov VI. Features of aerodynamics, stability and controllability of ekranoplans. Tsentralniy Aerogidrodinamicheskiy Institut im. Prof. N.E. Zhukovskogo, Moscow, 1997. p. 81.
49. Rozhdestvensky K.V. Characteristic features of aerodynamics of ekranoplan in extreme ground effect. Sudostroenie J 1 (1995) 6-8
50. Ermolenko S.D., Rogozin Yu.A., and Rogachev G.V. Calculation of Aerodynamic characteristics of rectangular wing with end plates moving with small subsonic speed near the ground, Izvestia VUZov. Aviatsionnaya Tekh 3 (1972) 105-113
51. Wenstedt J. Grondeeffect toestel verenigt snelheid en laadvermogen. Polytechnisch Weekblad, 16 July 1992.
52. Avvakumov MN. Unsteady Derivatives of aerodynamic coefficients for wings of finite aspect ratio, moving near plane and wavy surface. Voprosi Sudostroeniya, Seria: Proektirovanie Sudov, Vyp. 29; 1981.
53. Belinskiy V.G., et al. Maximum and average magnitudes of hydrodynamic characteristics of the wing, moving above nonplanar ground. Gidromekhanika 11 9 (1974) 528-536
54. Efremov II, Lukaschik EP. Influence of the waves on the underlying surface upon hydrodynamic characteristics of a wing of finite aspect ratio. Trudy Chuvashskogo Universiteta, Dinamika Sploshnoi Sredy s Poverkhnostyamy Rasdela, Cheeboksary, 1982. p. 69-75.
55. Grebeshov EP, Shakarvene EP, Tsvetkova GI. Aerodynamic characteristics of a wing in proximity of flat and wavy ground. Trudy TSAGI, Vyp. 1725, 1976. p. 3-28.
56. Rozhdestvensky K.V. Asymptotic theory of a wing, moving in close proximity to a solid wall. Izvestia AN SSSR, Mekhanika Zhidkosti i Gaza 6 (1977) 115-124
57. Maskalik AI, Rozhdestvensky KV, Sinitsyn DN. A view of the present state of research in aero- and hydrodynamics of ekranoplans. In: Proceedings of the symposium on fluid dynamics problems of vehicles operating near or in the air-sea interface. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Research and Technology Organization, 5-8 October 1998.
58. Besyadovskiy AR. A numerical estimation of aerodynamic characteristics and stability parameters of ekranoplans in group flight. In: Proceeding of the international conference on ground effect machines-GEM2000, St. Petersburg, 21-23 June 2000.
59. Wieselsberger C. Wing resistance near the ground. National advisory committee for aeronautics TM 77, April 1922.
60. Serebriysky Ya M. The Ground effect on aerodynamic characteristics of aircraft, Trudy TSAGI imeni N.E. Zhukovskogo, Vyp. 267, Moscow 1936.
61. Plotkin A., and Kennell C. Thickness induced lift on a thin airfoil in ground effect. AIAA J 19 (1981) 1484-1486
62. Plotkin A., and Dodbele S.S. Slender wing in ground effect. AIAA J 26 4 (1988) 493-494
63. Plotkin A., and Tan C.H. Lifting-line solution for a symmetrical thin wing in ground effect. AIAA J 24 (1986) 1193-1194
64. Panchenkov AN. The theory of optimal lifting surface. Novosibirsk, Nauka, 1983. p. 256.
65. Strand T., Royce W.W., and Fujita T. Cruise performance of channel flow ground effect machines. J Aero Sci 29 6 (1962) 702-711
66. Borst HV. The aerodynamics of the unconventional air vehicles of A. Lippisch, Henry V. Borst and Associates, Wayne, Pennsylvania, 1980, p. 280.
67. Widnall S.E., and Barrows T.M. An analytic solution for two and three-dimensional wings in ground effect. J Fluid Mech 41 Part 4 (1970) 769-792
68. Rozhdestvensky KV. Steady motion of a wing at vanishing distances from the ground. Trudy Leningradskogo Korablestroitelnogo Instituta, tom 80, 1972. p. 77-85.
69. Rozhdestvensky KV. Unsteady Motion of a wing of finite aspect ratio at vanishing distances from the ground. Trudy Leningradskogo Korablestroitelnogo Instituta, tom 80, 1972. p. 69-76.
70. Rozhdestvensky KV. Nonlinear theory of a slightly curved foil at small distances from a solid wall. Trudy Leningradskogo Korablestroitelnogo Instituta, tom 104, 1976. p. 88-95.
71. Rozhdestvensky K.V. On the problem of motion of a rectangular wing over a rigid wall. Proc Leningrad Shipbuild Inst 115 (1977) 62-68
72. Rozhdestvensky KV. On the Problem of the flow past a rectangular wing in parallel walls. Izvestia VUZov, Abiatsionnaya Tekhnika no. 4, 1978.
73. Rozhdestvensky KV. Method of matched asymptotic expansions in ydrodynamics of wings. Sudostroenie, Leningrad, 1979. p. 208.
74. Rozhdestvensky KV. Motion of a rectangular wing above wavy wall at arbitrary angles to the wave front. Trudy Leningradskogo Korablestroitelnogo Instituta, Gidromekhanika I Teoriya Korablya, 1979. p. 29-39.
75. Rozhdestvensky KV. Influence of slots upon hyrdodynamic characteristics of a thin foil in steady motion near a wall. In: Proceedings of the of the seminar on boundary problems, Kazanskii Gosudarstvennii Universitet, 1979. p. 201-15.
76. Rozhdestvensky KV. An estimate of the influence of lateral gaps upon hydrodynamic coefficients of a wing of finite aspect ratio in steady and unsteady motion near a wall. Izvestia AN SSSR, Mekhanika Zhidkosti i Gaza, 1980. p. 122-8.
77. Rozhdestvensky KV. On the influence of endplates upon hydrodynamic characteristics of a wing in steady and unsteady motion close to a solid wall. Izvestia AN SSSR, Sibirskoye Otdelenie, Asimptoticheskie metody v Dinamike Sistem, Novosibirsk, Nauka, 1980. p. 142-8.
78. Rozhdestvensky KV. Matched asymptotics in aerodynamics of WIG vehicles. In: Proceedings of the intersociety high performance marine vehicles conference and exhibit HMPV 92, VA, 24-27 June 1992. p. WS 17-27.
79. Rozhdestvensky KV. Asymptotic methods in aerodynamics of ekranoplans. In: Proceedings of the 1st international conference on ekranoplans. St. Petersburg: Marine Technical University; 3-5 May 1993. p. 81-115.
80. Kida T., and Miyai Y. A theoretical note on the lift distribution of a non planar ground effect wing. Aeronaut Q 24 3 (1973) 227-240
81. Tuck E.O. Steady flow and static stability of airfoils in extreme ground effect. J Eng Math 15 (1980) 89-102
82. Tuck E.O. A nonlinear unsteady one- dimensional theory for wings in extreme ground effect. J Fluid Mech 98 (1980) 33-47
83. Newman J.N. Analysis of small-aspect ratio lifting surfaces in ground effect. J Fluid Mech 117 (1982) 305-314
84. Gallington RW, Miller MK.The RAM-Wing: a comparison of simple one dimensional theory with wind tunnel and free flight results. In: AIAA paper 70-971, AIAA guidance, Control and flight mechanics conference, Santa Barbara, CA, August 1970.
85. Rozhdestvensky KV. An effective mathematical model of the flow past ekranoplan with small endplate tip clearances in extreme ground effect. In: Proceedings of the international workshop on twenty-first century flying ships.Sydney, Australia: University of New South Wales; 7-9 November 1995. p. 155-78.
86. Rozhdestvensky KV. Aerodynamics of a tandem of high aspect ratio/in ground effect, In: Proceedings of the international workshop WISE up to ekranoplan GEMs. Sydney, Australia: The University of New South Wales; 15-16 June 1998. p. 166-84.
87. Staufenbiel R, Bao-Tzang Y. Stability and control of ground effect aircraft in longtudinal motion. Translation, DTNSRDC report 77-0048, June 1977.
88. Kumar PE. An experimental investigation into the aerodynamic charactersistics of a wing with and without endplates in ground effect. College of aeronautics report, Aero 201, 1968.
89. Staufenbiel R, Yeh BT. Flugeigenschaften in der Laengsbewegung von Bodeneffekt-Fluggeraeten, Teil I and II, ZFW, vol. 24. January/February 1976. p. 3-9; and March/April 1976. p. 65-70.
90. Staufenbiel R. Flugeigenschaften von Bodeneffekt-Fluggeraeten. Zeitschrift fur Flugwissenschaften, vol. 24, Hefte 1, 2, January-Febrauary 1976. p. 3-9, March/April. p. 65-70; English Trans. "Stability and control of ground effect aircraft in longitudinal motion", DTNS RDC 77-0048, June 1977; 1976.
91. Staufenbiel R. Some nonlinear effects in stability and control of wing in ground effect vehicles. J. Aircraft August 1978; 15.
92. Staufenbiel R, Kleineidam G. Longitudinal motion of low-flying vehicles in nonlinear flowfields. In: Proceedings of the congress of the international council of the aeronautical sciences, Munich, FRG, 1980. p. 293-308.
93. Staufenbiel RW. On the design of stable ram wing vehicles. In: Proceedings of the symposium ram wing and ground effect craft. London: The Royal Aeronautical Society, 19 May 1987. p. 110-36.
94. Staufenbiel R., and Schlichting U.J. Stability of airplanes in ground effect. J Aircraft 25 4 (1988)
95. Zhukov V.I. Some matters of longitudinal stability of ekranoplans (1974), Trudy TSAGI, Moscow
96. Taylor G. Wise up to a WIG. Mar Model Mon June 1995.
97. Kleineidam G. Ein Beitrag zur Untersuchung der Aerodynamischen und Flugmechanischen Eigenschaften von Profilen in Bodennahe. Dissertation, RWTH, Aachen, FRG. 1981.
98. Gadetski VM. Investigation of aerodynamic characteristics of the foil with control devices near the ground. Trudy TSAGI, M., Vyp. 1256, 1970. p. 2.
99. Arkhangelski VN, Konovalov SI. Computational investigation of the influence of parameters of the foil upon its aerodynamic characteristics near the ground, Trudy TSAGI, vyp. 2304, M., 1985. p. 12-21.
100. Plissov NB, Rozhdestvensky KV, Treshkov VK. Aerodynamics of high speed ships with dynamic support, Leningrad, Sudostroenie, 1991. p. 247.
101. Kornev NV. Problems of stability of ekranoplans. In: Proceedings of the workshop on WIG ship technology. Yusung, Korea: Korea Research Institute on Ships and Ocean Engineering, 1-6 June 1995. p. 10.
102. Shin MS, et al. Wind Tunnel test results for eight and twenty passenger class wing in ground effect ships. In: Proceedings of the FAST'97, Sydney, July 1997.
103. Rozhdestvensky KV. Stability of a simple lifting configuration in extreme ground effect. In: Proceedings of the international conference on wing-in-ground-effect craft (WIGs), Paper no 16. London: The Royal Institution of Naval Architects, 4 and 5 December 1997.
104. Onspaugh CM. Wind tunnel investigation of single and tandem low aspect ratio wings in ground effect. Report LFL L-53, Lockheed Aircraft Corporation, California Division, May 1963.
105. Jörg GW. Tandem aerofoil flairboats (TAF). In: Proceedings of the international conference on wing-in-ground effect craft, London, Paper no. 3, 4 and 5 December 1997.
106. Sokolov V.V. A new generation of flying ships. Sudostroenie 638 (1991) 3-7
107. Rozhdestvensky KV. Theoretical analysis of dynamics of a WIG Vehicle in extreme ground effect. In: Proceedings of the symposium on fluid dynamics problems of vehicles operating near or in the air-sea interface. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Research and Technology Organization; 5-8 October 1998.
108. Zhukov VI. Particular features of aerodynamics of ekranoplan. In: Proceedings of the 1st international conference on ekranoplans. St. Petersburg: Marine Technical University; 3-5 May 1993. p. 23-36.
109. Fink MP, Lastinger JL. Aerodynamic characteristics of low-aspect-ratio wings in close proximity to the ground. NASA TN D-926, July 1961.
110. Alexeyev SS. Creation of high-speed amphibious boats using ground proximity effect on the example of SEVER boats. In: Proceedings of the international workshop ekranoplans and very fast craft. Sydney, Australia: The University of New South Wales; 5-6 December 1996. p. 134-45.
111. Cheremukhin O. An air-cushion take-off and landing device for aircraft and ekranoplans. In: Proceedings of the international workshop WISE up to ekranoplan GEMs. Sydney, Australia: The University of New South Wales; 15-16 June 1998. p. 247-62.
112. Fischer H, Matjasic K. The Hoverwing technology-bridge between WIG and ACV. In: Proceedings of the international conference on wing-in-ground effect craft, London, Paper no. 5, 4 and 5 December 1997.
113. Muller W. Abbildungstheoretische Grundlagen fur das Problem des Tragflugels in Bodennahe, ZMM, 1931.
114. Murao R, Seki S, Tomita N. On a study of a WIG with propeller-deflected slipstream (PDS) by using a radio-controlled model. In: Proceedings of the 8th international conference on fast sea transportation (FAST 2005), St. Petersburg, Russia, 27-30 June 2005.
115. Kravchuk SV, et al. Flying over waves (ekranoplan 'Orlyonok'). Aviat J Aerohobby, 1992; 2: 2-10.
116. Fischer H. Base of experience in ground effect-Fischer Flugmekhanik. In: Proceedings of the WIG meeting, organized by Techno Trans e.V., Rostock, Germany, 29-30 September 1995.
117. Diomidov VB. Automatic control of motion of ekranoplan. Electropribor, Saint-Petersburg, 1996. p. 51.
118. Akagi S. Synthetic aspects of transport economy and transport vehicle performance with reference to high speed marine vehicles, FAST 91, Trondheim, Norway, vol. 1. 1991. p. 277-92.
119. Bogdanov AI, Maskalik AI. Some results on the civil ekranoplans certification works. In: Proceedings of the international workshop ekranoplans and very fast craft. Sydney, Australia: The University of New South Wales; 5-6 December 1996. p. 177-85.
120. Kuteinikov MA, Gappoev MA, Gadalov VV. Wing-in-ground effect (WIG) craft (ekranoplan) general safety aspects as contained in the international instruments and RS rules. Perspectives. In: Proceedings of the 8th international conference on fast sea transportation (FAST 2005), St. Petersburg, Russia, 27-30 June 2005.
121. Pustoshniy A, Anosov V, Ganin S. Some remarks on WIG development in Russia and state of the art with WIG regulations and designing. In: Proceedings of the 1st international symposium on WIG crafts. Korea: Sofitel Ambassador Seoul, 8 November 2005. p. 7-13.
122. Rules of classification and construction of small ekranoplans of type A. St. Petersburg, Russian Maritime Register of Shipping, 1998.