Tangent distance kernels for support vector machines

Proceedings - International Conference on Pattern Recognition

Volumn 16, Issue 2, 2002, Pages 864-868

  Haasdonk, Bernard ^a   Keysers, Daniel ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF FREIBURG   (Germany)

^b RWTH AACHEN UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CLASSIFICATION (OF INFORMATION); COMPUTATIONAL GEOMETRY; LEARNING SYSTEMS; PROBLEM SOLVING; INVARIANCE; METADATA; SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINES;

GEOMETRIC TRANSFORMATIONS; SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINES (SVM);

PATTERN RECOGNITION;

CLASSIFICATION METHODS; DISTANCE MEASURE; DISTANCE-BASED CLASSIFICATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION PROBLEMS; PRIORI KNOWLEDGE; STATE-OF-THE-ART METHODS; TANGENT DISTANCE; TRANSFORMATION INVARIANCE;

EID: 33751577170     PISSN: 10514651     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (15)

1. C. Bahlmann, B. Haasdonk, and H. Burkhardt. Handwriting recognition with support vector machines - a kernel approach. In Proceedings 8th International Workshop on Frontiers in Handwriting Recognition, 2002, in press.
2. C. Berg, J. Christensen, and P. Ressel. Harmonic analysis on semigroups: theory of positive definite and related functions. Springer, 1984.
3. C. J. C. Burges. Geometry and invariance in kernel based methods. In Advances in Kernel Methods - Support Vector Learning, pages 89-116. MIT Press, 1999.
4. H. Burkhardt and S. Siggelkow. Invariant features in pattern recognition - fundamentals and applications. In Nonlinear Model-Based Image/Video Processing and Analysis, pages 269-307. John Wiley & Sons, 2001.
5. D. DeCoste and B. Schölkopf. Training invariant support vector machines. Machine Learning, 46(1):161-190, 2002.
6. T. Joachims. Making large-scale SVM learning practical. In Advances in Kernel Methods - Support Vector Learning, pages 169-184. MIT Press, Cambridge MA, 1999.
7. D. Keysers, J. Dahmen, T. Theiner, and H. Ney. Experiments with an extended tangent distance. In Proceedings 15th International Conference on Pattern Recognition, vol. 2, pages 38-42. IEEE Computer Society, 2000.
8. D. Keysers, W. Machcrey, J. Dahmen, and H. Ney. Learning of variability for invariant statistical pattern recognition. In ECML 2001, 12th European Conference on Machine Learning, LNCS, 2167, pages 263-275. Springer, 2001.
9. J. Platt, N. Cristianini, and J. Shawe-Taylor. Large margin dags for multiclass classification. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 12, pages 547-553. MIT Press, 2000.
10. B. Schölkopf. The kernel trick for distances. TR MSR 2000-51, Microsoft Research, Redmond, WA, 2000.
11. B. Schölkopf, C. Burges, and V. Vapnik. Extracting support data for a given task. In Proceedings First International Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining, pages 252-257. AAAI Press, 1995.
12. B. Schölkopf, C. Burges, and V. Vapnik. Incorporating invariances in support vector learning machines. In Artificial Neural Networks - ICANN'96, LNCS, 1112, pages 47-52. Springer, 1996.
13. P. Simard, Y. Le Cun, and J. Denker. Efficient pattern recognition using a new transformation distance. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 5, pages 50-58. Morgan Kaufmann, San Mateo, CA, 1993.
14. P. Y. Simard, Y. A. LeCun, J. S. Denker, and B. Victorri. Transformation invariance in pattern recognition - tangent distance and tangent propagation. In LNCS, 1524, pages 239-274. Springer, 1998.
15. V. Vapnik. The Nature of Statistical Learning Theory. Springer, New York, 1996.