Highly qualified teachers for all

Educational Leadership

Volumn 64, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 14-20

  Darling Hammond, Linda ^a   Berry, Barnett ^b  

^a STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b The Center for Teaching Quality   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33751572176     PISSN: 00131784     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Benner, A. D. (2000). The cost of teacher turnover. Austin, TX: Texas Center for Educational Research.
2. Boyd, D., Girossman, P., Lankford, H., Loeb, S., & Wyckoff, J. (2006). How changes in entry requirements alter the teacher workforce and affect student achievement, Education Finance and Policy, 1(2), 176-216.
3. Center for Teaching Quality. (2004). Unfulfilled promise: Ensuring high quality teachers for our nation's students. Chapel Hill, NC: Author. Available: www.teachingquality.org/pdfs/NCLB_PublishedReport.pdf
4. Center for Teaching Quality (2006a). Improving teacher recruitment and retention in rural school districts: A preliminary report to Halifax County Schools. Hillsborough, NC: Author.
5. Center for Teaching Quality. (2006b). Spotlight: Teacher working conditions. Available: www.teachingquality.org/twc/main.htm
6. Clotfelter, C., Ladd, H., Vigdor, J., & Diaz, R. (2003, February). Do school accountability systems make it more difficult for low performing schools to attract and retain high quality teachers? (Revised). Paper prepared for the annual meeting of the American Economic Association, Washington, DC.
7. Darling-Hammond, L. (2000), Teacher quality and student achievement: A review of state policy evidence, Education Policy Analysis Archives, 8(1). Available: http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v8n1
8. Darling-Hammond, L., Holtzman, D., Gatlin, S.J., & Heilig, J. V. (2005). Does teacher preparation matter? Education Policy Analysis Archives, 1.3(42). Available: http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v13n42
9. Darling-Hammond, L., & Sykes, G. (2003). Wanted: A national teacher supply policy for education. Educational Policy Analysis Archives, 11(33). Available: http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v11n33
10. Feller, B. (2006, May 12). No states meet teacher quality goal. The Washington Post.
11. Humphrey, D., Koppich, J., & Hough, H. (2005). Sharing the wealth: National board certified teachers and the schools that need them most. Menlo Park, CA: SRI International.
12. McClure, P., Piché, D., & Taylor, W. L. (2006), Days of reckoning: Are states and the. federal government up to the challenge of ensuring a qualified teacher for every student? Washington, DC: Author. Available: www.cccr.org/DaysofReckoning.pdf
13. Rentner, D. S., Scott, C., Kober, N., Chudowsky, N., Chudowsky, V., Joftus, S., Zabala, D. (2006). From the capital to the classroom: Year 4 of the No Child Left Behind Act. Washington, DC: Center for Education Policy.
14. U.S. Department of Education. (2002). Meeting the highly qualified teacher challenge: The secretary's annual report in teacher quality. Available: www.title2,org/ADATitleIIReport2002.pdf
15. Wenglinsky, H. (2000). How teaching matters: Bringing the classroom back into discussions of teacher quality. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
16. Wilson, S., Darling-Hammond, L., & Berry, B. (2000), A case of successful teaching policy: Connecticut's long-term efforts to improve teaching and learning. Seattle, WA: Center for the Study of Teaching and Policy.