|
Volumn 3, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 131-139
|
The case of the disappearing polymorph: 'Inherent anticipation' and the impact of SmithKline Beecham Corp. v Apotex Corp. (Paxil®) on patent validity and infringement by inevitable conversion
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
Indexed keywords
ANTIDEPRESSANT AGENT;
GENERIC DRUG;
PAROXETINE;
SEROTONIN UPTAKE INHIBITOR;
TERAZOSIN;
ARTICLE;
CLINICAL TRIAL;
DRUG DESIGN;
DRUG EFFICACY;
DRUG FORMULATION;
DRUG INDUSTRY;
HUMAN;
JURISPRUDENCE;
LAW SUIT;
LEGAL ASPECT;
MEDICAL DOCUMENTATION;
PATENT;
UNITED STATES;
|
EID: 33751564845
PISSN: 17411343
EISSN: 17417090
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1057/palgrave.jgm.4940110 Document Type: Article |
Times cited : (5)
|
References (18)
|