Costs and benefits of stock enhancement and biological invasion control: The case of the Bay of Brest scallop fishery

Aquatic Living Resources

Volumn 19, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 299-305

  Frésarda, Marjolaine ^a   Boncoeur, Jean ^a  

^a INSTITUT UNIVERSITAIRE EUROPÉEN DE LA MER   (France)

Author keywords

Cost benefit analysis; Crepidula fornicata; Eastern Atlantic Ocean; Fisheries management; Harmful algal blooms; Invasive alien species; Pecten maximus

Indexed keywords

BIOLOGICAL INVASION; COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS; ECONOMIC IMPACT; INVASIVE SPECIES; NUMERICAL MODEL; SCALLOP CULTURE; STOCK ENHANCEMENT; SUSTAINABILITY; TOXIC MATERIAL;

BAY OF BREST; BRETAGNE; EURASIA; EUROPE; FINISTERE; FRANCE; WESTERN EUROPE;

ALGAE; CREPIDULA FORNICATA; PECTEN MAXIMUS; PECTINIDAE;

EID: 33751564231     PISSN: 09907440     EISSN: 17652952     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1051/alr:2006031     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Alban F., Kervarec F., Le Lec G., Le Floc'h P., Boncoeur J., 2001, L'impact socio-économique du programme de production artificielle de coquilles Saint-Jacques en rade de Brest. Etude réalisée pour le CLPMdu Nord-Finistère et financée dans le cadre du programme européen PESCA, Rapport final, CEDEM, Université de Bretagne Occidentale, Brest, 71p.
2. Barbier E.B., 2001, A note on the economics of biological invasions. Ecological Economics 39, 197-202.
3. Boncoeur J., Alban F., Dao J.C., 2003, Complementarity between aquaculture and small-scale fishing: the Bay of Brest scallop case. Bull. Aquac. Assoc. Can. 103, 19-26.
4. Boucher J., Dao, J.C., 1989, Repeuplement et forçage du recrutement de la coquille Saint-Jacques. In: Troadec J.P. (Ed.) L'homme et les ressources halieutiques, Éditions Ifremer, Plouzané, pp. 313-358.
5. Carlton J.M., 1989, Man's role in changing the face of the ocean: biological invasions and implications for conservation of nearshore environments. Conserv. Biol. 3, 265-273.
6. Chauvaud L. Thouzeau G., Paulet Y.M., 1998, Effects of environmental factors on the daily growth rate of Pecten maximus juveniles in the Bay of Brest (France). J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 227, 83-111.
7. Chauvaud L., Thouzeau G., Grall J., Paulet Y.M., 2003, La crépidule en rade de Brest : un paradoxe pour le devenir de la coquille Saint-Jacques. In: Laubier L. (Ed.) Exploitation et surexploitation des ressources marines vivantes, Académie des Sciences, Rapport sur la Science et la Technologie No. 17, Lavoisier, Paris, pp. 307-318.
8. CLPMEM du Nord-Finistère, 2001, Programme pour l'élimination et la substitution des crépidules en rade de Brest. Dossier de demande d'aide communautaire relative à un investissement dans le secteur des pêches maritimes et de l'aquaculture, Brest, 16 p.
9. Coum A., 1979, La population de crépidules Crepidula fornicata (L.) en rade de Brest : écologie et dynamique. PhD Thesis, University of Western Brittany, Brest.
10. Dalmazzone S., 2000, Economic factors affecting vulnerability to biological invasions. In: Perrings C., Williamson M., Dalmazzone S. (Eds.) The Economics of Biological Invasions, Cheltenham, Elgar, pp. 17-30.
11. GESAMP (IMO/FAO/UNESCO-IOC/WMO/WHO/IAEA/UN/UNEP Joint Group of Experts on the Scientific Aspects of Marine Environmental Protection) and Advisory Committee on Protection of the Sea, 2001. Protecting the oceans from landbased activities - Land-based sources and activities affecting the quality and uses of the marine, coastal and associated freshwater environment. Rep. Stud. GESAMP No. 71.
12. Glowka L., Burhenne-Guilmin F., Synge H., 1994, A guide to the convention on biological diversity. UICN, Gland, Switzerland.
13. Guérin L., 2004, La crépidule en rade de Brest: un modèle biologique d'espèce introduite proliférante en réponse aux fluctuations de l'environnement. PhD Thesis, University of Western Brittany, Brest.
14. Hanley N., Spash C., 1993, Cost-Benefit Analysis and the Environment. Cheltenham, Elgar.
15. Perrings C., Williamson M., Dalmazzone S. (Eds.), 2000, The Economics of Biological Invasions. Cheltenham, Elgar.
16. Pimentel D., Zuniga R., Morrison D., 2005, Update on the environmental and economic costs associated with alien-invasive species in the United States. Ecol. Econ. 52, 273-288.
17. Ragueneau O., Chauvaud L., Leynaert A., Thouzeau G., Paulet Y.M., Bonnet S., Lorrain A., Grall J., Corvaisier R., Le Hir M., Jean F., Clavier J., 2002, Direct evidence of a biologically active coastal silicate pump : Ecological implications. Limnol. Oceanogr. 47, 1849-1854.
18. Thieltges D.W., 2005, Impact of an invader: epizootic American slipper limpet Crepidula fornicata reduces survival and growth in European mussels. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 286, 13-19.
19. Thieltges D.W., Strasser M., Reise K., 2006, How bad are invaders in coastal waters? The case of the American slipper limpet Crepidula fornicata in western Europe. Biol. Inv., in press.
20. van den Bergh J.C.J.M., Nunes P.A.L.D., Dotinga H.M., Kooistra W.H.C.F., Vrieling E.G., Peperzak L., 2002, Exotic harmful algae in marine ecosystems: an integrated biological-economic-legal analysis of impacts and policies. Mar. Pol. 26, 59-74.
21. Vitousek P.M., D'Antonio C.M., Loope L.L., Rejmanek M., Westbrooks R., 1997, Introduced species: a significant component of human-caused global change. N.Z. J. Ecol. 21, 1-13.
22. Wilcove D.S., Rothenstein D., Dubow J., Phillips A., Losos E., 1998, Quantifying threats to imperiled species in the United States. Bioscience 48, 607-615.