A qualitative examination of the juvenile drug court treatment process

Journal of Social Work Practice in the Addictions

Volumn 6, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 91-114

  Bryan, Valerie ^a   Hiller, Matthew ^b   Leukefeld, Carl ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY   (United States)

^b TEMPLE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Adolescents; Drug abuse; Drug court; Juveniles; Substance abuse treatment

Indexed keywords

EID: 33751552127     PISSN: 1533256X     EISSN: 15332578     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1300/J160v06n04_06     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Belenko, S. (1999). Research on drug courts: A critical review 1999 update. National Drug Court Institute Review, 2(2): 1-58.
2. Belenko, S. (2001). Research on drug courts: A critical review 2001 update. New York, NY: The National Center on Addiction and Substance Abuse at Columbia University.
3. Belenko, S. (2002). The challenges of conducting research in drug treatment court settings. Substance Use and Misuse, 37(12 & 13): 1635-1664.
4. Belenko, S., & Logan, T.K. (2003). Delivering more effective treatment to adolescents: Improving the drug court model. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 25, 185-211.
5. Clark, M.D. (2000). The juvenile drug court judge and lawyer: Four common mistakes in treating drug court adolescents. Juvenile and Family Court Journal, Fall, 37-46.
6. Conners, N.A., & Franklin, K.K. (2000). Using focus groups to evaluate participant satisfaction in an alcohol and drug treatment program. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 18(4): 313-320.
7. Cooper, C. (2001). Juvenile drug court programs. Washington, DC: Office of Justice Programs, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.
8. Cooper, C., Nerney, M., Parnham, J., & Smith, B. (1999). Juvenile drug courts: Where have we been? Where should we be going? Washington, DC: Justice Programs Office.
9. Creswell, J.W. (1998). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Traditions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
10. Goldkamp, J.S., White, M.D., & Robinson, J.B. (2001). Do drug courts work? Getting inside the drug court black box. Journal of Drug Issues, 31(1): 27-72.
11. Gottfredson, D.C., Najaka, S.S., & Kearley, B. (2003). Effectiveness of drug treatment courts: Evidence from a randomized trial. Criminology and Public Policy, 2(2): 171-196.
12. Harrell, A. (1996). Evaluation strategies for human services programs. Washington, DC: Urban Institute.
13. Harrell, A. (2003). Judging drug courts: Balancing the evidence. Criminology and Public Policy, 2(2): 207-213.
14. Harrell, A., Cavanagh, S., & Roman, J. (2000). Evaluation of the D.C. Superior drug court interventions programs. National Institute Research in Brief (NCJ 178941). Washington, DC: Office of Justice Programs.
15. Hiller, M.L., Narevic, E., Logan, T.K., & Leukefeld, C.G. (2002). An evaluation of the Campbell County juvenile drug court. Offender Substance Abuse Report, 2(1), 1-9.
16. Hiller, M.L., Narevic, E., Webster, J.M., Rosen, P., Staton, M., Leukefeld, C.G., Garrity, T. F., & Kayo, R. (in press). Problem severity and motivation for treatment in incarcerated substance abusers. Substance Use and Misuse.
17. Hiller, M.L., Malluche, D., Patterson, B., Abensur, R.L., Bryan, V., Payne, C., & Leukefeld, C.G. (in press). A multi-site process evaluation of juvenile drug courts. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation.
18. Hiller, M., Knight, K., Leukefeld, C., & Simpson, D. (2002). Motivation as a predictor of therapeutic engagement in mandated residential substance abuse treatment. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 29(1): 56-75.
19. Leukefeld, C.G., Tims, F., & Farabee, D. (Eds.). (2002). Treatment of drug offenders: Policies and issues. New York: Springer Publications.
20. Logan, T.K., Hiller, M.L., Leukefeld, C.G., & Minton, L. (in press). Drug court outcomes: Criminal justice involvement, social adjustment, and self-reported drug use. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation.
21. Miller, J.M., & Shutt, J.E. (2001). Considering the need for empirically grounded drug court screening mechanisms. Journal of Drug Issues, 31(1), 91-106.
22. Nurco, D.N., Hanlon, T.E., Bateman, R.W., & Kinlock, R.W. (1995). Drug abuse treatment in the context of correctional surveillance. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 12(1): 19-27.
23. Peters, R.H., Haas, A.L., & Murrin, M.R. (1999). Predictors of retention and arrest in drug courts. National Drug Court Institute Review, 2(1): 33-60.
24. Peters, R.H., & Murrin, M.R. (2000). Effectiveness of treatment-based drug courts in reducing criminal recidivism. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 27(1): 72-96.
25. Simpson, D.D. (2001). Modeling treatment process and outcomes. Addiction, 96(2): 207-211.
26. Simpson, D.D., & Knight, K. (2002). TCU model of treatment process and outcomes in correctional settings. In A. Fins (Ed.), State of Corrections. Lanham, MD: American Correctional Association.
27. Staton, M., Mateyoke, A., Cole, J., Hopper, H., Logan, T.K., & Leukefeld, C. (2002). Employment issues among drug court participants, Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 33(4): 73-85.
28. Taxman, F. (1999). Unraveling "what works" for offenders in substance abuse treatment services. National Drug Court Institute Review, 2(2): 93-134.
29. Turner, S., Longshore, D., Wenzel, S., Deschenes, E., Greenwood, P., Fain, T., Harrell, A., Morral, A., Taxman, F., Iguchi, M., Greene, J. & McBride, D. (2002). A decade of drug treatment court research. Substance Use and Misuse, 37(12 & 13): 1489-1527.
30. United States Department of Justice. (1998). Juvenile and family drug courts: An overview. Washington, DC: Office of Justice Programs, Drug Courts Program Office.
31. United States Department of Justice. (2003). Juvenile drug courts: Strategies in practice (monograph). Washington, DC: Office of Justice Programs, Bureau of Justice Assistance.