Antimicrobial resistance in scandinavia after ban of antimicrobial growth promoters

Animal Biotechnology

Volumn 17, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 147-156

  Bengtsson, Björn ^a   Wierup, Martin ^b  

^a NATIONAL VETERINARY INSTITUTE   (Sweden)

^b SWEDISH UNIVERSITY OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Antimicrobials; Food animal; Growth promoter; Production; Resistance

Indexed keywords

BACTERIA; GROWTH KINETICS; HEALTH CARE; MEATS; PRODUCTION CONTROL;

ANTIMICROBIAL RESISTANCE; FOOD ANIMAL PRODUCTION; GROWTH PROMOTERS;

ANTIBIOTICS;

ANIMALIA; BACTERIA (MICROORGANISMS); SUS SCROFA;

ANTIINFECTIVE AGENT; VETERINARY DRUG;

ANIMAL; ANIMAL HUSBANDRY; ANTIBIOTIC RESISTANCE; ARTICLE; BACTERIUM; DRUG EFFECT; DRUG LEGISLATION; DRUG UTILIZATION; ECONOMICS; LEGAL ASPECT; MEAT; PATHOGENICITY; SCANDINAVIA; SWINE; ZOONOSIS;

ANIMAL HUSBANDRY; ANIMALS; ANTI-BACTERIAL AGENTS; BACTERIA; DRUG RESISTANCE, BACTERIAL; DRUG UTILIZATION; LEGISLATION, DRUG; MEAT; SCANDINAVIA; SWINE; VETERINARY DRUGS; ZOONOSES;

EID: 33751540952     PISSN: 10495398     EISSN: 15322378     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10495390600956920     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Johnson G, Jacobsson SO. The influence of the use of in feed-antibiotics on mortality in calves. Svensk Veterinärtidn 1973; 25:17-22 (in Swedish).
2. Wierup M, Larson K, Holtenius P, Jacobsson SO, Månsson M. Effect of antimicrobial feed additive on antibiotic resistance, morbidity and growth in calves. Nord Vet Med 1975; 27:253-265.
3. Grave L, Frokjaer Jensen V, Odensvik K, Wierup M. Usage of veterinary therapeutic antimicrobials antinicrobial in Denmark, Norway and Sweden following termination of antinicrobial growth promoter use. Prev Vet Med 2006; 75:123-132.
4. WHO. The Medical Impact of the Use Anticrobialsin Food Animals: Report and Proceedings of a WHO Meeting, Berlin, Germany, 13-17 October 1997, WHO/EMC/ZOO/97.4.
5. WHO. Use of Quinolones in Food Animals and Potential Impact on Human Health: Report and Proceedings of a WHO Meeting, Geneva, Switzerland, 2-5 June 1998, WHO/EMC/ZDI/98.12.
6. WHO. WHO Global Principles for the Containment of Antimicrobial Resistance in Animals Intended for Food: Report of a WHO Consultation, Geneva, Switzerland, 5-9 June 2000. WHO/CDS/CSR/APH/2000.
7. WHO. WHO Global Strategy for Containment of Antimicrobial Resistance. WHO, Geneva, Switzerland. 2001. WHO/CDS/CSR/DRS/2001.2.
8. WHO. Monitoring Antimicrobial Usage in Food Animals for the Protection of Human Health: Report of a WHO Consultation, Oslo, Norway, 10-13 September 2001.
9. European Commission (EC), Directorate-General (DG) XXIV, Consumer Policy and Consumer Health Protection., 1999. Opinion of the Scientific Steering Committee on antimicrobial resistance. http://europa.eu.int/comm/food/fs/sc/ssc/ out50_en.pdf.
10. SVARM 2004. Swedish Veterinary Antimicrobial Resistance Monitoring, The National Veterinary Institute, Uppsala, Sweden. 2005. ISSN 1650-6332. www.sva.se.
11. DANMAP 2004. Use of Antimicrobial agents and occurrence of antimicrobial resistance in bacteria from food animals, foods and humans in Denmark. 2005. www.dfvf.dk.
12. NORM/NORM-VET 2004. Usage of Antimicrobial Agents and Occurrence of Antimicrobial Resistance in Norway. 2005. www.vetinst.no.
13. FINRES-Vet 2002-2003. Finnish veterinary Antimicrobial resistance monitoring and Consumption of Antimicrobial Agents. 2004. www.eela.fi.
14. Greko C. Use of antibiotics for animal from 1989 to 1997. In Ministry of Agriculture Seminar on the Swedish Model of Animal Production, Stockholm 3-4 Sept. 1998; 8-14.
15. DANMAP 2003. Use of antimicrobial agents and occurrence of antimicrobial resistance in bacteria from food animals, foods and humans in Denmark. 2004. www.dfvf.dk.
16. MARAN-2002. Monitoring of Antimicrobial Resistance and Antibiotic Usage in The Netherlands. 2003. www.vwa.nl.
17. SVARM 2003. Swedish Veterinary Antimicrobial Resistance Monitoring, The National Veterinary Institute, Uppsala, Sweden. 2004. ISSN 1650-6332. www.sva.se.
18. MARAN-2004. Monitoring of Antimicrobial Resistance and Antibiotic Usage in The Netherlands. 2005. www.vwa.nl.
19. MARAN-2003. Monitoring of Antimicrobial Resistance and Antibiotic Usage in The Netherlands. 2004. www.vwa.nl.
20. Johansson A, Greko C, Engström BE, Karlsson MA. Antimicrobial susceptibility of Swedish, Norwegian and Danish isolates of Clostridium perfringens from poultry, and distribution of tetracycline resistance genes. Vet Microbiol 2004; 94:225-235.
21. Martel A, Devriese LA, Cauwerts K, De Gussem K, Decostere A, Haesebrouck F. Susceptibility of Clostridium perfringens strains from broiler chickens to antibiotics and anticoccidials. Avian Pathology 2004; 33:3-7.
22. EMEA. Antibiotic resistance in the European Union Associated with Therapeutic Use of Veterinary Medicines. Report and Qualitative Risk Assessment by the Committee for Veterinary Medicinal Products. The European Agency for the Evaluation of Medicinal Products. 1999. www.emea.eu.int/index/indexvl.htm.
23. DANMAP 2002, Use of antimicrobial agents and occurrence of antimicrobial resistance in bacteria from food animals, foods and humans in Denmark. 2003. www.dfvf.dk.
24. AFSSA. Rapport Intermediaire. Utilisation des Antibiotiques chez 1' animal et Résistance aux Antibiotiques chez les Bactéries d' origine Animal. Agence Francaise de Sécurité Sanitaire des Aliments. 2003. www.afssa.fr.
25. VLA. VLA antimicrobial sensitivity report 2003. Veterinary Laboratory Agency, Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, 2004. www.defra.gov.uk.
26. VMD. Sales of Antimicrobial Products Authorised for Use as Veterinary Medicines, Antiprotozoals, Antifungals, Growth Promoters and Coccidiostats, in the UK. Veterinary Medicines Directorate, Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, 2004. www.vmd.gov.uk
27. The Community Summary Report on Trends and Sources of Zoonoses. Zoonotic Agents and Antimicrobial Resistance in the European Union in 2004, www.efsa.eu.int/science/monitoring_zoonoses/reports/1277_en.html.
28. EFSA opinion. Opinion of the Scientific Panel BIOHAZ related to Risk assessment and mitigation options of Salmonella in pig production. Adopted on 16 March 2006 (Question No EFSA-Q-2005-019); pp 1-131; http://www.efsa.eu.int/ science/biohaz/biohaz_opinions/1430_en.html.
29. Kjeldsen N, Callesen J. Terminated use of antimicrobial growth promoters in pig production in Denmark: effects on pig welfare and productivity. In Antimicrobial Growth Promoters, Where do we go from Here? Barug D, de Jong J, Kies AK, Verstegen MWA, Ed; Wageningen Academic Publ., 2006:127-135.
30. Wierup M. The Swedish experiences of the 1986 year ban of antimicrobial growth promoters, with special reference to animal health, disease prevention, productivity, and usage of antimicrobials. Microbial Drug Resistance 2001; 7:183-190.
31. WHO/CPE/ZFK/2003. 1: Impact of Antimicrobial Growth Promoter Termination Denmark. The WHO International Panel's evaluation of the Termination of the Use of Antimicrobial Growth Promoters in Denmark. Folum, Denmark, 6-9 November 2002.
32. Laine T, Yliaho M, Myllys V, Pohjanvirta T, Fossi M, Anttila M. The effect of antimicrobial growth promoter withdrawal on the health of weaned pigs in Finland. Prev Vet Med 2004; 66:163-174.
33. Wierup M, Wegener HC. Termination of AGP use and effect on subsequent production of broiler chicken in Sweden and Denmark during a 25 year period. In Antimicrobial Growth Promoters, Where do we go from Here? Barug D, de Jong J, Kies AK, Verstegen MWA, Ed; Wageningen Academic Publ., 2006:137-148.