Wireless broadband, communities, and the shape of things to come

Government Information Quarterly

Volumn 23, Issue 3-4, 2006, Pages 348-358

  Strover, Sharon ^a   Mun, Seung Hwan ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33751537764     PISSN: 0740624X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.giq.2006.09.002     Document Type: Editorial

References (22)

1. American Library Association v. FCC. (2005). 401 F3d 489 (DC Circuit).
2. Brennan Center for Justice at NYU School of Law. (2006). Submission to Nebraska's LB 645 Task Force: The need to permit broadband from public entities. Retrieved May 16, 2006, from http://www.brennancenter.org/programs/fepp/broadbandwhitepaper.pdf
3. Bush, G.W. (2004, April 26). Broadband rights-of-way memorandum (Press release) [On-line]. Retrieved from http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2004/04/20040426-2.html
4. Committee on Broadband Last Mile Technology, Computer Science and Telecommunications Board, National Research Council. Broadband: Bringing home the bits (2002), National Academies Press, Washington, DC
5. European Union. (2006, July 7). State aid: Commission endorses public funding to bridge broadband communications gap in Greece [On-line]. Retrieved July 20, 2006, from http://europa.eu.int/rapid/pressReleasesAction.do?reference=IP/06/949 &format=HTML&aged=0&language=EN&guiLanguage=en
6. FCC v. Midwest Video Corporation. (1979). 440 U.S. 689 ("Midwest Video II").
7. Ferguson, C. (2002, July). The United States broadband problem: Analysis and policy recommendations. (The Brookings Institution Policy Brief #105, Working Paper). Retrieved December 2002 from http://www.brookings.edu/comm/policybriefs/pb105.pdf
8. Ford G.S., and Koutsky T.M. Broadband and economic development: A municipal case study from Florida. Review of Urban & Regional Development Studies 17 3 (2005) 216-229
9. Frug G. The city as a legal concept. Harvard Law Review 93 6 (1980) 1057-1154
10. Government of Canada. Broadband for rural and northern development (2003), Information Distribution Centre, Industry Canada, Ottawa
11. Government Technology [Web site]. (2006). Retrieved from http://www.govtech.net/digitalcommunities/story.php?id=94240
12. Grubesic T.H., and Murray A.T. 'Where' matters: Location and Wi-Fi access. Journal of Urban Technology 11 1 (2004) 1-28
13. Hu, J., Reardon, M. (2005, May 2). Cities brace for broadband war [On-line]. Retrieved May 23, 2005, from CNET News.com
14. Legislature of Nebraska (2006). Legislative Bill 645. Retrieved from http://www.unicam.state.ne.us/pdf/FINAL_LB645_1.pdf
15. Miami Herald Publishing Co. v. Tornillo. (1974). 418 U.S. 241.
16. National Cable & Telecommunication Association v. Brand X Internet Services. (2005). 125 U.S. 2688.
17. Nixon v. Missouri Municipal League et al., 541 U.S. 125 (2004). Retrieve from http://www.oyez.org/oyez/resource/case/1640/
18. Red Lion Broadcasting Co. v. FCC. (1969). 395 U. S. 367.
19. Rowe B. Strategies to promote advanced telecommunications capabilities. Federal Communications Law Journal 52 (2000) 381-409
20. Servon L. Bridging the digital divide: Technology, community and public policy (2002), Blackwell Publishing, Malden, MA
21. TechNet. (2003). State Broadband Index [On-line]. Retrieved from http://www.technet.org/
22. Telecommunications Act of 1996, 110 Stat. 70, 47 U.S.C. Section 253.