Debating the state of comparative politics: Views from qualitative research

Comparative Political Studies

Volumn 40, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 32-38

  Mahoney, James ^a  

^a NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33751534909     PISSN: 00104140     EISSN: 15523829     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0010414006294816     Document Type: Review

References (7)

1. Bennett, A., Barth, A., & Rutherford, K. R. (2003). Do we preach what we practice? A survey of methods in political science journals and curricula. PS: Political Science and Politics, 36, 373-378.
2. Collier, D., Brady, H. E., & Seawright, J. (2004). Sources of leverage in causal inference: Toward an alternative view of methodology. In H. E. Brady & D. Collier (Eds.), Rethinking social inquiry: Diverse tools, shared standards (pp. 229-266). Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
3. George, A. L., & Bennett, A. (2005). Case studies and theory development in the social sciences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
4. Gerring, J. (2004). What is a case study and what is it good for? American Political Science Review, 98, 341-354.
5. Mahoney, J., & Goertz, G. (2006). A tale of two cultures: Contrasting quantitative and qualitative research. Political Analysis, 14, 227-249.
6. McKeown, T. J. (1999). Case studies and the statistical worldview: Review of King, Keohane, and Verba's Designing Social Inquiry. International Organization, 53, 161-190.
7. Skocpol, T. (1994). Reflections on recent scholarship about social revolutions and how to study them. In T. Skocpol (Ed.), Social revolutions in the modern world (pp. 301-344). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.