Prediction on affected upper extremity function in hemiplegic patients after thalamic hemorrhage using somatosensory evoked magnetic fields

Journal of the Japanese Physical Therapy Association

Volumn 9, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 9-15

  Yoshida, Hideki ^a   Kondo, Takeo ^b   Nakasato, Nobukazu ^c  

^a HIROSAKI UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^b TOHOKU UNIVERSITY GRADUATE SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (Japan)

^c KOHNAN HOSPITAL   (Japan)

Author keywords

Affected upper extremity function; Prediction; Somatosensory evoked magnetic fields; Thalamic hemorrhage

Indexed keywords

EID: 33751533261     PISSN: 13441272     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1298/jjpta.9.9     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Omae T, Ueda K, et al.: Toole TL (ed) Handbook of Clinical Neurology 10. Amsterdam, Elsevier, 1989, pp 287-331.
2. Chui C, Howng SL: Thalamic hemorrhage: a computed tomographic-clinical study in prognostic prediction. Gaoxiong Yi Xue Ke Xue Za Zhi 5: 231-240, 1989.
3. Mori S, Sadoshima S, et al.: Impact of thalamic hematoma on six-month mortality and motor and cognitive functional outcome. Stroke 26: 620-626, 1995.
4. Misra UK, Kalita J: Evoked potential studies in thalamic hemorrhage. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 98: 291-298, 1996.
5. Matsuzaki T, Shimazaki M, et al.: Prediction of motor function recovery with coronal MRI in thalamic hemorrhage: Pyramidal line. Brain Hemorrhage 97: 21-27, 1999.
6. Maruishi M, Shima T, et al.: Effect of somatosensory disturbance to outcomes of motor function in thalamic hemorrhage: evaluation with short-latency somatosensory evoked potential (SSEP). No To Shinkei 50: 631-635, 1998 (in Japanese).
7. Nakasato N, Yoshimoto T: Somatosensory, auditory, and visual evoked magnetic fields in patients with brain diseases. J Clin Neurophysiol 17: 201-211, 2000.
8. Nakasato N, Itoh H, et al.: Movement-related magnetic fields to tongue protrusion. NeuroImage 14: 924-935, 2001.
9. Yoshida H, Kondo T, et al.: Prediction on early motor recovery in patients with thalamic hemorrhage by using somatosensory evoked magnetic fields. Rigakuryohogaku 31: 1-8, 2004 (in Japanese).
10. Kakigi R: Somatosensory evoked magnetic fields following median nerve stimulation. Neurosci Res 20: 165-174, 1994.
11. Srisa-an P, Lei L, et al.: Somatosensory evoked potentials: noninvasive source analysis. J Clin Neurophysiol 13: 156-163, 1996.
12. Kawamura T, Nakasato N, et al.: Neuromagnetic evidence of pre- and post-central cortical sources of somatosensory evoked responses. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 100: 44-50, 1996.
13. Grynszpan F, Geselowitz DB: Model studies of the magnetocardiogram. Biophys J 13: 911-925, 1973.
14. Hamalainen M, Hari R, et al.: Magnetoencephalography: theory, instrumentation, and applications to noninvasive studies of the working human brain. Rev Mod Phys 65: 413-497, 1993.
15. Wade DT, Wood VA, et al.: Recovery after stroke - The first 3 months. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 48: 7-13, 1985.
16. Nakayama H, Jorgensen HS, et al.: Recovery of upper extremity function in stroke patients: The Copenhagen stroke study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 75: 394-398, 1994.
17. Brunnstrom S: Movement Therapy in Hemiplegia; A Neurophysiological Approach. New York, Harpar & Row, 1970.
18. Hirayama K, Fukutake T, et al.: 'Thumb localizing test' for detecting a lesion in the posterior column-medial lemniscal system. J Neurol Sci 167: 45-49, 1999.
19. Ueda S, Hasegawa T, et al.: Standardization of the finger function test and upper extremity ability test for hemiplegia. Jpn J Rehabil Med 22: 143-160, 1985 (in Japanese):
20. Katrak P, Bowring G, et al.: Predicting upper limb recovery after stroke: the place of early shoulder and hand movement. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 79: 758-761, 1998.
21. Heller A, Wade DT, et al.: Arm function after stroke: measurement and recovery over the first three months. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 50: 714-719, 1987.
22. Sunderland A, Tinson D, et al.: Arm function after stroke: An evaluation of grip strength as a measure of recovery and a prognostic indicator. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 50: 1267-1272, 1989.
23. Feys H, Hetebrij J, et al.: Predicting arm recovery following stroke: value of site of lesion. Acta Neurol Scand 102: 371-377, 2000.
24. Kusoffsky A, Wadell I, et al.: The relationship between sensory impairment and motor recovery on patients with hemiplegia. Scand J Rehab Med 14: 27-32, 1982.
25. Wikstrom H, Rione RO, et al.: Specific changes in somatosensory evoked magnetic fields during recovery from sensorimotor stroke. Ann Neurol 47: 353-360, 2000.
26. Huang M, Davis LE, et al.: MEG response to median nerve stimulation correlates with recovery of sensory and motor function after stroke. Clin Neurophysiol 115: 820-833, 2004.
27. Luders H, Lesser RP, et al.: Cortical somatosensory evoked potentials in response to hand stimulation. J Neurosurg 58: 885-894, 1983.
28. Kudo K, Yamadori A: Somatosensory evoked potentials in patients with thalamic hemorrhage. J Neurol 232: 61-66, 1985.
29. Wikstrom H, Rione RO, et al.: Somatosensory evoked magnetic fields from the primary somatosensory cortex (SI) in acute stroke. Clin Neurophysiol 110: 916-923, 1999.