The Nuremberg doctors' trial: The 60th anniversary

Intensive Care Medicine

Volumn 32, Issue 12, 2006, Pages 2049-2052

  Lemaire, François ^a  

^a HENRI MONDOR HOSPITAL   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARMY; CLINICAL RESEARCH; DECISION MAKING; EUTHANASIA; GERMANY; HUMAN; HUMAN RIGHTS; LAW; LAW SUIT; MEDICAL EDUCATION; MEDICAL ETHICS; MEDICAL PRACTICE; MEDICAL RESEARCH; PHYSICIAN; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; SHORT SURVEY;

GERMANY; HISTORY, 20TH CENTURY; HUMANS; PHYSICIAN'S ROLE; WAR CRIMES;

EID: 33751528631     PISSN: 03424642     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00134-006-0467-0     Document Type: Short Survey

References (8)

1. Katz J (1992) The consent principle of the Nuremberg code: its significance then and now. In: Annas G, Grodin M (eds) The Nazi doctors and the Nuremberg code. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 227-239
2. Taylor T (1946) Opening statement of the prosecution, December 9, 1946. In: Annas G, Grodin M (eds) The Nazi doctors and the Nuremberg code. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 67-93
3. Berger R (1990) Nazi science; the Dachau hypothermia experiments. New England J Medicine 322:1435-1440
4. Schmidt U (2004) Justice at Nuremberg: Leo Alexander and the Nazi Doctors' trial. St Antony's Series. Palgrave; Macmillan
5. Grodin M (1992) Historical origin of the Nuremberg code. In: Annas G, Grodin M (eds) The Nazi doctors and the Nuremberg code. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 121-144
6. Vollmann J, Winau R (1996) Informed consent in human experimentation before the Nuremberg code. BMJ 313:1445-1447
7. Shuster E (1997) Fifty Years Later: The Significance of the Nuremberg Code. N Engl J Med 337:1436-1440
8. Weindling P (1996) Human guinea pigs and the ethics of experimentation: the BMJ's correspondent at the Nuremberg medical trial. BMJ 313:1467-1470