Optimal linear combinations of triple frequency carrier phase data from future global navigation satellite systems

GPS Solutions

Volumn 11, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 11-19

  Richert, Todd ^a   El Sheimy, Naser ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALGARY   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33751520924     PISSN: 10805370     EISSN: 15211886     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10291-006-0024-x     Document Type: Article

References (9)

1. Galileo Mission Requirements Document Issue 5.0 - Draft (2002) Prepared by the European Commission and the European Space Agency, 25 July 2002
2. Galileo - The European Programme for Global Navigation Services (2005) Andrew Wilson (ed) Coordinated by Muriel Simon (Galileo Joint Undertaking). European Space Agency Publications Division, copyright 2005
3. Hothem L (2004) GNSS modernization program and GPS policies. Presentation at the Antarctic remote observatory meeting, Boulder, 19-20 September 2004
4. Kim D, Langley R (2001) Mitigation of GPS carrier phase multipath effects in real-time kinematic applications. Proceedings of ION GPS-2001, pp. 2144-2152
5. Kim D, Langley R (2003) On ultrahigh-precision GPS positioning and navigation. Navigation 50(2):103-116
6. Navstar GPS Space Segment/Navigation User Interfaces Interface Control Document (ICD), Revision 200c, prepared and published for the GPS JPO by ARINC, revised September, 1997, Institute of Navigation, Salt Lake City, USA
7. Radovanovic R, Fotopoulos G, El-Sheimy N (2001) On optimizing GNSS multi-frequency carrier phase combinations for precise positioning. Presented at the international association of Geodesy 2001 scientific assembly, Budapest, Hungary, 2-7 September 2001
8. Richert T (2005) The impact of future global navigation satellite systems on precise carrier phase positioning. M.Sc. thesis. Geomatics Engineering Department, University of Calgary, UCGE Report No. 20218
9. Teunissen PJG (1998) GPS carrier phase ambiguity fixing concepts. GPS for Geodesy, Chapter 8, 2nd edn. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp. 319-388