Negative polarity licensing at the syntax-semantics interface

Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics

Volumn 1997-July, Issue , 1997, Pages 144-150

  Fry, John ^a  

^a STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTATIONAL LINGUISTICS; GLUES; GLUING; LINEAR ALGEBRA; SEMANTICS; SYNTACTICS;

GLUE LANGUAGES; LINEAR LOGIC; LINEAR LOGIC PROOF; NEGATIVE POLARITY; NEGATIVE POLARITY ITEMS; PROOFNET; SYNTAX-SEMANTICS INTERFACE;

COMPUTER CIRCUITS;

EID: 33751509752     PISSN: 0736587X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (13)

1. Mary Dalrymple, John Lamping, and Vijay Saraswat. 1993. LFG semantics via constraints. In Proceedings of the 6th Meeting of the European Association for Computational Linguistics, University of Utrecht, April.
2. Mary Dalrymple, John Lamping, Fernando Pereira, and Vijay Saraswat. 1994. A deductive account of quantification in LFG. In Makoto Kanazawa, Christopher J. Pifi6n, and Henriette de Swart, editors, QuantiJ~ers, Deduction, and Context. CSLI Publications, Stanford, CA.
3. Mary Dalrymple, John Lamping, Fernando Pereira, and Vijay Saraswat. To appear. Quantifiers, anaphora, and intensionality. Journal of Logic, Language and Information.
4. David Dowty. 1994. The role of negative polarity and concord marking in natural language reasoning. In Mandy Harvey and Lynn Santelmann, editors, Proceedings of SALT IV, pages 114-144, Ithaca, NY. Cornell University.
5. Jean Gallier. 1992. Constructive logics. Part II: Linear logic and proof nets. MS, Department of Computer and Information Science, University of Pennsylvania.
6. Jean-Yves Girard. 1987. Linear logic. Theoretical Computer Science, 50.
7. Nirit Kadmon and Fred Landman. 1993. Any. Linguistics and Philosophy 16, pages 353-422.
8. William A. Ladusaw. 1979. Polarity Sensitivity as Inherent Scope Relations. Ph.D. thesis, University of Texas, Austin. Reprinted in Jorge Hankamer, editor, Outstanding Dissertations in Linguistics. Garland, 1980.
9. Alain Lecomte and Christian Retor6. 1995. Pom-set logic as an alternative categorial grammar. In Glyn V. Morrill and Richard T. Oehrle, editors, Formal Grammar. Proceedings of the Conference of the European Summer School in Logic, Language, and Information, Barcelona.
10. Dale A. Miller. 1990. A logic programming language with lambda abstraction, function variables and simple unification. In Peter Schroeder-Heister, editor, Extensions of Logic Programming, Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence. Springer-Verlag.
11. Glyn V. Morrill. 1996. Memoisation of categorial proof nets: parallelism in categorial processing. In V. Michele Abrusci and Claudia Casadio, editors, Proceedings of the Roma Workshop on Proofs and Linguistic Categories, Rome.
12. Victor Shnchez Valencia. 1991. Studies on Natural Logic and Categorial Grammar. Ph.D. thesis, University of Amsterdam.
13. Victor Shnchez Valencia. 1995. Parsing-driven inference: natural logic. Linguistic Analysis, 25(3-4):258-285.