Global and local processing in adult humans (Homo sapiens), 5-year-old children (Homo sapiens), and adult cotton-top tamarins (Saguinus oedipus)

Journal of Comparative Psychology

Volumn 120, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 323-330

  Neiworth, Julie J ^a   Gleichman, Amy J ^a,b   Olinick, Anne S ^a,c   Lamp, Kristen E ^a,d  

^a CARLETON COLLEGE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

^c ETR ASSOCIATES   (United States)

^d LOYOLA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Cotton top tamarins; Discrimination; Global precedence; Local bias; Perception

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ANIMAL; ANTHROPOIDEA; ARTICLE; CHILD; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; PERCEPTIVE DISCRIMINATION; PRESCHOOL CHILD; VISION;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ANIMALS; CHILD; CHILD, PRESCHOOL; DISCRIMINATION (PSYCHOLOGY); DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; SAGUINUS; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 33751434510     PISSN: 07357036     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0735-7036.120.4.323     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Brock, J., Brown, C., Boucher, J., & Ripon, G. (2002). The temporal binding deficit hypothesis of autism. Development and Psychopathology, 14, 209-224.
2. Brosnan, M. J., Scott, F. J., Fox, S., & Pye, J. (2004). Gestalt processing in autism: Failure to process perceptual relationships and the implications for contextual understanding. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 45, 459-469.
3. Cassia, V. M., Simion, F., Milani, E., & Umilta, C. (2002). Dominance of global visual properties at birth. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 131, 398-411.
4. Cohen, J. D., MacWhinney, B., Flatt, M., & Provost, J. (1993). PsyScope: A new graphic interactive environment for designing psychology experiments. Behavioral Research Methods, Instruments & Computers, 25, 257-271.
5. De Lillo, C., Spinozzi, G., Truppa, V., & Naylor, D. M. (2005). A comparative analysis of global and local processing of hierarchical visual stimuli in young children (Homo sapiens) and monkeys (Cebus apella). Journal of Comparative Psychology, 119, 155-165.
6. De Valois, R. L., & Jacobs, G. H. (1968, November). Primate color vision. Science, 16, 533-540.
7. Dukette, D., & Stiles, J. (1996). Children's analysis of hierarchical patterns: Evidence from a similarity judgment task. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 63, 103-140.
8. Dukette, D., & Stiles, J. (2001). The effects of stimulus density on chil dren's analysis of hierarchical patterns. Developmental Science, 4, 233-251.
9. Fagot, J., & Deruelle, C. (1997). Processing of global and local visual information and hemispherical specialization in humans (Homo sapiens) and baboons (Papio papio). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 23, 429-442.
10. Fagot, J., & Tomonaga, M. (1999). Global and local processing in humans (Homo sapiens) and chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes): Use of a visual search task with compound stimuli. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 113, 3-12.
11. Fagot, J., Tomonaga, M., & Deruelle, C. (2001). Processing of the global and local dimensions of visual hierarchical stimuli by humans (Homo sapiens), chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes), and baboons (Papio papio). In Matsuzawa. T. (Ed.). Primate origins of human cognition and behavior (pp. 87-103). New York: Springer-Verlag.
12. Fobes, J. L., & King, J. E. (1982). Vision: The dominant primate modality. In Fobes, J. L., & King, L. E. (Eds.), Primate behavior (219-243). New York: Academic Press.
13. Fremouw, T., Herbranson, W. T., & Shimp, C. P. (2002). Dynamic shifts of pigeon local/global attention. Animal Cognition, 5, 233-243.
14. Fujita, K., & Matsuzawa, T. (1990). Delayed figure reconstruction by a chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes), and humans (Homo sapiens). Journal of Comparative Psychology, 104, 345-351.
15. Ghim, H. R., & Eimas, P. D. (1988). Global and local processing by 3- and 4-month-old infants. Perception & Psychophysics, 43, 165-171.
16. Hopkins, W. D., & Washburn, D. A. (2002). Matching visual stimuli on the basis of global and local features by chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) and rhesus monkeys (Macaco mulatta). Animal Cognition, 5, 27-31.
17. Joliffe, T., & Baron-Cohen, S. (1997). Are people with autism and Asperger's syndrome faster than normal on the embedded figures test? Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 38, 527-534.
18. Kimchi, R. (1990). Children's perceptual organization of hierarchical patterns. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 2, 133-149.
19. Kimchi, R. (1992). Primacy of holistic processing and global/local paradigm: A critical review. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 24-38.
20. Mottron, L., Belleville, S., & Menard, E. (1999). Local bias in autistic subjects as evidenced by graphic tasks: Perceptual hicrarchization or working memory deficit? Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 40, 743-755.
21. Navon, D. (1977). Forest before trees: The precedence of global features in visual perception. Cognitive Psychology, 9, 353-383.
22. Navon, D. (1981). The forest revisited: More on global precedence. Psychological Research, 43, 1-32.
23. Neiworth, J. J., Anders, S. L., & Parsons, R. R. (2001). Tracking responses related to self-recognition: A frequency comparison of responses to mirrors, photographs, and videotape of monkeys by cotton top tamarins (Saguinus oedipus). Journal of Comparative Psychology, 115, 432-438.
24. Neiworth, J. J., Burman, M. A., Basile, B. M., & Lickteig, M. T. (2002). Use of experimenter-given cues in visual co-orienting and in an object-choice task by a new world monkey species, cotton top tamarins (Saguinus oedipus). Journal of Comparative Psychology, 116, 3-11.
25. Neiworth, J. J., Parsons, R. R., & Hassett, J. M. (2004). A test of the generality of perceptually-based categories found in infants: Attentional differences toward natural kinds by New World monkeys. Developmental Science, 7, 185-193.
26. Neiworth, J. J., Steinmark, H., Basile, B. M., Wonders, R., Steely, F., & DeHart, C. (2003). A test of object permanence in a New World monkey species, cotton top tamarins (Saguinus oedipus). Animal Cognition, 6, 27-37.
27. Quinlan, P., & Wilton, R. (1998). Grouping by proximity or similarity? Competition between the gestalt principles in vision. Perception, 27, 417-430.
28. Quinn, P. C., Bhatt, R. S., Brush, D., Grimes, A., & Sharpnack, H. (2002). Development of form similarity as a Gestalt grouping principle in infancy. Psychological Science, 4, 320-328.
29. Shah, A., & Frith, U. (1983). An islet in ability of autistic children: A research note. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 24, 613-620.
30. Spinozzi, G., De Lillo, C., & Truppa, V. (2003). Global and local processing of hierarchical visual stimuli in tufted capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella). Journal of Comparative Psychology, 117, 15-23.
31. Tanaka, H., & Fujita, I. (2000, September 11). Global and local processing of visual patterns in macaques monkeys. Neuroreport: For Rapid Communication of Neuroscience Research, 11, 2881-2884.
32. Tomonaga, M., & Matsuzawa, T. (1992). Perception of complex geometric figures in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) and humans (Homo sapiens): Analyses of visual similarity on the basis of choice reaction time. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 106, 43-52.
33. Triesman, A., & Peterson, R. (1984). Emergent features, attention and object perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 10, 12-31.
34. van Kleek, M., & Kosslyn, S. (1989). Gestalt laws of perceptual organization in an embedded figures task: Evidence for hemispheric specialization. Neuropsychologia, 27, 1179-1186.