Two-lane totally asymmetric exclusion processes with particle creation and annihilation

Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications

Volumn 375, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 247-256

  Jiang, Rui ^a   Wang, Ruili ^b   Wu, Qing Song ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY OF CHINA   (China)

^b MASSEY UNIVERSITY   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

ASEP; Langmuir kinetics; Two lane

Indexed keywords

BOUNDARY CONDITIONS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DENSITY (OPTICAL); SYNCHRONIZATION;

CREATION/ANNIHILATION RATE; DENSITY PROFILES; LANGMUIR KINETICS; MEAN-FIELD ANALYSIS; TOTALLY ASYMMETRIC SIMPLE EXCLUSION PROCESSES (TASEP);

STATISTICAL MECHANICS;

EID: 33751420491     PISSN: 03784371     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.physa.2006.08.025     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Derrida B. Phys. Rep. 301 (1998) 65
2. Schütz G.M. In: Domb C., and Lebowitz J.L. (Eds). Phase Transitions and Critical Phenomena vol. 19 (2001), Academic Press, San Diego
3. MacDonald J.T., Gibbs J.H., and Pipkin A.C. Biopolymers 6 (1968) 1
4. Schütz G.M. Europhys. Lett. 48 (1999) 623
5. Chou T. Phys. Rev. Lett. 80 (1998) 85
6. Widom B., Viovy J.L., and Defontaines A.D. J. Phys. I 1 (1991) 1759
7. Klumpp S., and Lipowsky R. J. Stat. Phys. 113 (2003) 233
8. Shaw L.B., Zia R.K.P., and Lee K.H. Phys. Rev. E 68 (2003) 021910
9. Chowdhury D., Santen L., and Schadschneider A. Phys. Rep. 329 (2000) 199
10. Helbing D. Rev. Mod. Phys. 73 (2001) 1067
11. Schadschneider A. Eur. Phys. J. B 10 (1999) 573
12. Schütz G., and Domany E. J. Stat. Phys. 72 (1993) 277
13. Evans M.R., Rajewsky N., and Speer E.R. J. Stat. Phys. 95 (1999) 45
14. de Gier J., and Nienhuis B. Phys. Rev. E 59 (1999) 4899
15. Rajewsky N., Santen L., Schadschneider A., and Schreckenberg M. J. Stat. Phys. 92 (1998) 151
16. Popkov V., and Peschel I. Phys. Rev. E 64 (2001) 026126
17. Popkov V., and Schütz G.M. J. Stat. Phys. 112 (2003) 523
18. Popkov V. J. Phys. A 37 (2004) 1545
19. Pronina E., and Kolomeisky A.B. J. Phys. A 37 (2004) 9907
20. Mitsudo T., and Hayakawa H. J. Phys. A 38 (2005) 3087
21. Parmegianni A., Franosh T., and Frey E. Phys. Rev. Lett. 90 (2003) 086601
22. Parmegianni A., Franosh T., and Frey E. Phys. Rev. E 70 (2004) 046101
23. Popkov V., et al. Phys. Rev. E 67 (2003) 066117
24. Evans M.R., Juhász R., and Santen L. Phys. Rev. E 68 (2003) 026117
25. Levine E., and Willmann R.D. J. Phys. A 37 (2004) 3333
26. Juhász R., and Santen L. J. Phys. A 37 (2004) 3933
27. Georgiev I.T., Schmittmann B., and Zia R.K.P. Phys. Rev. Lett. 94 (2005) 115701
28. The simulations show that the results remain essentially the same if lane changing is allowed on this site. This is because the densities on sites of (1,1) and (2,1) are same, therefore, the lane changing behaviors will not affect the densities on the two sites.
29. Similarly, the results remains essentially the same if lane changing is allowed on this site.
30. Note that in lane 1, the density at location x < 0.2 essentially remains unchanged when Ω is small.
31. Here the positions of the shocks are determined from mean-field predictions because the shocks have finite width and their positions are difficult to identify in finite system.
32. 2, i.