Endowments vs. market potential: What explains the relocation of industry after the Polish reunification in 1918?

Explorations in Economic History

Volumn 44, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 22-42

  Wolf, Nikolaus ^a  

^a FREIE UNIVERSITÄT BERLIN   (Germany)

Author keywords

Economic geography; Economic integration; Interwar period; Poland

Indexed keywords

EID: 33751416124     PISSN: 00144983     EISSN: 10902457     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.eeh.2005.08.003     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Acemoglu D., Robinson J., and Johnson S. The colonial origins of comparative development: an empirical investigation. American Economic Review 91 5 (2001) 1369-1401
2. Brülhart M. Economic geography, industry location, and trade: the evidence. World Economy 21 6 (1998) 775-801
3. Davis D., and Weinstein D. Economic geography and regional production structure: an empirical investigation. European Economic Review 43 (1999) 379-407
4. Davis D., and Weinstein D. Bombs, bones, and breakpoints: the geography of economic activity. American Economic Review 92 5 (2002) 1269-1289
5. Davis D., and Weinstein D. Market access, economic geography, and comparative advantage: an empirical assessment. Journal of International Economics 59 1 (2003) 1-23
6. Eaton J., and Kortum S. Technology, geography and trade. Econometrica LXX (2002) 1741-1779
7. Ellison G., and Glaeser E.L. The geographic concentration of industry: does natural advantage explain agglomeration?. American Economic Review 89 2 (1999) 311-316
8. Fremdling, R., Hohorst, G., 1979. Marktintegration der preußischen Wirtschaft im 19. Jahrhundert: Skizze eines Forschungsansatzes zur Fluktuation der Roggenpreise zwischen 1821 und 1865. In: Fsremdling, Tilly (Eds.), Industrialisierung und Raum: Studien zur regionalen Differenzierung im Deutschland des 19. Jahrhunderts, Stuttgart, pp. 56-101.
9. Jaffe A., Trajtenberg M., and Henderson R. Geographic localization and knowledge spillovers as evidence by patent citations. Quarterly Journal of Economics 108 3 (1993) 577-598
10. Harris C. The market as a factor in the localization of industry in the United States. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 64 (1954) 315-348
11. Landau Z., and Tomaszewski J. Robotnicy Przemysłowi w Polsce (1971), Ksia{ogonek}żkai Wiedza, Warsaw
12. Midelfart-Knarvik K.H., and Overman H.G. Delocation and European integration: is structural spending justified?. Economic Policy 35 (2002) 322-359
13. Midelfart-Knarvik, K.H., Overman, H.G., Redding, S., Venables, A., 2000. The Location of European Industry. Economic Papers No. 142, European Commission, D-G for Economic and Financial Affairs, Brussels.
14. Midelfart-Knarvik, K.H., Overman, H.G., Venables, A., 2001. Comparative advantage and economic geography: estimating the determinants of industrial location in the EU. London School of Economics, mimeo.
15. Overman H., Redding S., and Venables A. The economic geography of trade, production and income: a survey of empirics. In: Harrigan J., and Choi K. (Eds). Handbook of International Trade (2003), Blackwell, Oxford
16. Redding S., and Venables A. Economic geography and international inequality. Journal of International Economics 62 1 (2004) 53-82
17. Redding, S., Sturm, D., 2005. The costs of remoteness: evidence from German division and reunification. CEPR Discussion Paper 5015.
18. Trenkler C., and Wolf N. Economic integration across borders: the Polish Interwar Economy 1921-1937. European Review of Economic History 9 2 (2005) 199-231
19. Wolf, N., 2004. Endowments, market potential, and industrial location: evidence from interwar Poland (1918-1939). CEP discussion paper 609, London School of Economics.
20. Wolf N. Path dependent border effects: the case of Poland's reunification (1918-1939). Explorations in Economic History 42 (2005) 414-438