Discourses of postmodern epistemology: Radical impetus lost?

Progress in Development Studies

Volumn 6, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 306-320

  Müller, Martin ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MÜNSTER   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Discourse; Geography; Hybridity; Postdevelopment; Postmodernism; Radicalism

Indexed keywords

DEVELOPMENT PROJECT; MODERNIZATION; RESEARCH WORK;

EID: 33751400360     PISSN: 14649934     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1191/1464993406ps145oa     Document Type: Article

References (91)

1. Beauregard, R.A. 1988: In the absence of practice: the locality research debate. Antipode 20, 52-59.
2. Bernstein, R.J. 1985: Introduction. In Bernstein, R.J., editor, Habermas and modernity. Polity Press, 1-34.
3. Blaikie, P. 2000: Development, post-, anti-, and populist: a review. Environment and Planning A 32, 1033-50.
4. Brigg, M. 2002: Post-development, Foucault and the colonisation metaphor. Third World Quarterly 23, 421-36.
5. Cooke, P. 1990: Back: to the future: modernity, postmodernity and locality. Unwin Hyman.
6. Corbridge, S. 1989: Marxism, post-Marxism and the geography of development. In Peet, R. and Thrift, N., editors, New models in geography. Unwin Hyman, 224-54.
7. _1993: Marxisms, modernities, and moralities: development praxis and the claims of distant strangers. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 11, 449-7 2.
8. _1998: 'Beneath the pavement only soil': the poverty of post-development. Journal of Development Studies 34, 138-48.
9. Curry, G.N. 2003: Moving beyond post-development: facilitating indigenous alternatives for 'development'. Economic Geography 79, 405-23.
10. Dear, M. 1991: Book review: The condition of postmodernity by David Harvey. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 81, 533-39.
11. _1995: Practising postmodern geography. Scottish Geographical Magazine 111, 179-81.
12. Deutsche, R. 1991: Boys town. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 9, 5-30.
13. Doel, M. A. 1996: A hundred thousand lines of flight: a machinic introduction to the nomad thought and scrumpled geography of Gilles Deleuze and Félix Guattari. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 14, 421-39.
14. _2003: Gunnar Olsson's transformers: the art and politics of rendering the co-relation of society and space in monochrome and technicolor. Antipode 35, 140-67.
15. Escobar, A. 1984/85: Discourse and power in development: Michel Foucault and the relevance of his work to the Third World. Alternatives 10, 377-400.
16. _1995a: Encountering development: the making and unmaking of the third world. Princeton University Press.
17. _1995b: Imagining a post-development era. In Crush, J., editor, Power of development. Routledge, 211-27.
18. _2001: Culture sits in places: reflections on globalism and subaltern strategies of localization. Political Geography 20, 139-74.
19. Esteva, G. 1985: Development: metaphor, myth, threat. Development: Seeds of Change 3, 78-79.
20. _1987: Regenerating people's space. Alternatives 12, 125-52.
21. Esteva, G. and Prakash, M.S. 1998: Grassroots postmodernism: remaking the soil of cultures. Zed Books.
22. Ferguson, J. 1990: The anti-politics machine: 'development,' depoliticization, and bureaucratic power in Lesotho. Cambridge University Press.
23. Foucault, M. 1969: Larchéologie du savoir. Éditions Gallimard.
24. Gardner, K. and Lewis, D. 1996: Anthropology, development and the post-modern challenge. Pluto Press.
25. Gasper, D. 1996: Culture and development ethics: needs, women's right, and Western theories. Development and Change 27, 627-61.
26. Goldman, M. 2003: Partitioned nature, privileged knowledge: community-based conservation in Tanzania. Development and Change 34, 833-62.
27. Graham, J. 1988: Post-modernism and Marxism. Antipode 20, 60-66.
28. Hamnett, C. 1997: Guest editorial: the sleep of reason? Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 15, 127-28.
29. _2001: The emperor's new theoretical clothes, or geography without origami. In Philo, G. and Miller, D., editors, Market killing: what the free market does and what social scientists can do about it. Longman, 158-69.
30. _2003: Contemporary human geography: fiddling while Rome burns? Geoforum 34, 1-3.
31. Harris, C. 1991: Book review: The condition of postmodernity by David Harvey. Economic Geography 67, 154-55.
32. Hart, G. 2001: Development critiques in the 1990s: culs de sac and promising paths. Progress in Human Geography 25, 649-58.
33. Harvey, D. 1989: The condition of postmodernity: an inquiry into the origins of cultural change. Blackwell.
34. Hoogvelt, A. 2001: Globalization and the postcolonial world: the new political economy of development. Johns Hopkins University Press.
35. Jäger, S. 1999: Kritische Diskursanalyse: Eine Einführung. DISS.
36. _2001: Discourse and knowledge: theoretical and methodological aspects of a critical discourse and dispositive analysis. In Wodak, R. and Meyer, M., editors, Methods of critical discourse analysis. Sage, 32-62.
37. Jameson, F. 1984: Postmodernism, or the cultural logic of late capitalism. New Left Review 146, 53-92.
38. _1989: Marxism and postmodernism. New Left Review 176, 31-45.
39. Jencks, C. 1986: What is post-modernism? Academy Editions.
40. Kiely, R. 1999: The last refuge of the noble savage? A critical account of post-development. European Journal of Development Research 11, 30-55.
41. Latouche, S. 1993: In the wake of the affluent society: an exploration of post-development. Zed Books.
42. Lehmann, D. 1997: An opportunity lost: Escobar's deconstruction of development. The Journal of Development Studies 33, 568-78.
43. Ley, D. 2003: Forgetting postmodernism? Recuperating a social history of local knowledge. Progress in Human Geography 27, 537-60.
44. Link, J. 1983: Was ist und was bringt Diskurstaktik. kultuRRevolution 1, 6-21.
45. Lovering, J. 1989: Postmodernism, Marxism, and locality research: the contribution of critical realism to the debate. Antipode 21, 1-12.
46. Markusen, A. 1999: Fuzzy concepts, scanty evidence, policy distance: the case for rigour and policy relevance in critical regional studies. Regional Studies 33, 869-84.
47. Martin, R. 2001: Geography and public policy: the case of the missing agenda. Progress in Human Geography 25, 189-210.
48. Massey, D. 1991: Flexible sexism. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 9, 31-57.
49. Massumi, B. 1996: Becoming-deleuzian. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 14, 395-406.
50. Matthews, S. 2004: Post-development theory and the question of alternatives: a view from Africa. Third World Quarterly 25, 373-84.
51. Mattissek, A. and Reuber, P. 2004: Die Diskursanalyse als Methode in der Geographie - Ansätze und Potentiale. Geographische Zeitschrift 92, 227-42.
52. Mohan, G. and Stokke, K. 2000: Participatory development and empowerment: the dangers of localism. Third World Quarterly 21, 247-68.
53. Muecke, S. 1996: Outback. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 14, 407-20.
54. Müller, M. 2005a: Ceci n'est pas une fin: reconsidering the rôle of postmodernism in development, geography and development geography. Unpublished MPhil thesis, Development Studies Committee, University of Cambridge.
55. _2005b: Lost in translation: development politics in between the spaces of 'the cultural'. Geographische Zeitschrift 93, 121-33.
56. Munck, R. 2000: Postmodernism, politics, and paradigms in Latin America. Latin American Perspectives 27, 11-26.
57. Nederveen Pieterse, J. 1998: My paradigm or yours? Alternative development, post-development, reflexive development. Development and Change 29, 343-73.
58. _2000: After post-development. Third World Quarterly 21, 175-91.
59. _2001: Development theory: Reconstructions/reconstructions. Sage.
60. Nustad, K.G. 2001: Development: the devil we know? Third World Quarterly 22, 479-89.
61. Olsson, G. 2000: From a = b to a = a. Environment and Planning A 32, 1235-44.
62. Peet, R. 1998: Modern geographical thought. Blackwell.
63. Peet, R. and Hartwick, E. 1999: Theories of development. The Guilford Press.
64. Pile, S. and Rose, G. 1992: All or nothing? Politics and critique in the modernism-postmodernism debate. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 10, 123-36.
65. Power, M. 2003: Rethinking development geographies. Routledge.
66. Rahnema, M. and Bawtree, V., editors 1997: Thepost-development reader. Zed Books.
67. Rapley, J. 2004: Development studies and the post-development critique. Progress in Development Studies 4, 350-54.
68. Rees, J. 1999: Regional science: from crisis to opportunity. Papers in Regional Science 78, 101-10.
69. Rew, A. 2003: Why has it ended up here? Development (and other) messages and social connectivity in northern Orissa. Journal of International Development 15, 925-38.
70. Rist, G. 1997: The history of development: from western origins to global faith. Zed Books.
71. Rocheleau, D., Ross, L., Morrobel, J., Malaret, L., Hernandez, R. and Kominiak, T. 2001: Complex communities and emergent ecologies in the regional agroforest of Zambrana-Chacuey, Dominican Republic, Ecumene 8, 465-92.
72. Sachs, W., editor 1992: The development dictionary: a guide to knowledge as power. Zed Books.
73. Shrestha, N.R. 1997: On 'what causes poverty? A postmodern view'. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 87, 709-16.
74. Simon, D. 1997: Development reconsidered: new directions in development thinking. Geografiska Annaler, Series B 79, 183-201.
75. _1998: Rethinking (post)modernism, postcolonialism, and posttraditionalism: South-North perspec tives. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 16, 219-45.
76. _2003: Dilemmas of development and the environment in a globalizing world: theory, policy and praxis. Progress in Development Studies 3, 5-41.
77. _2005: Separated by common ground? Bringing (post)development and (post)colonialism together. Centre for Developing Areas Research.
78. Slater, D. 1992: Theories of development and politics of the post-modern: exploring a border zone. Development and Change 23, 283-319.
79. Smith, R.G. and Doel, M.A. 2001: Baudrillard unwound: the duplicity of post-Marxism and deconstruction. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 19, 137-59.
80. Soja, E. 1989: Postmodern geographies: the reassertion of space in critical social theory. Verso.
81. Stea, D. 1969: Positions, purposes, pragmatics: a journal of radical geography. Antipode 1, 1-2.
82. Storper, M. 2001: The poverty of radical theory today: from the false promises of Marxism to the mirage of the cultural turn. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 25, 155-79.
83. Townsend, J.C., Porter, C. and Mawdsley, E. 2004: Creating spaces of resistance: development NGOs and their clients in Ghana, India and Mexico. Antipode 36, 871-89.
84. Veltmeyer, H. 2001: The politics of language: deconstructing the discourse of postdevelopment. Canadian Journal of Development Studies 22, 597-620.
85. Warf, B. 1993a: Postmodernism and the localities debate: ontological questions and epistemological implications. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie 84, 162-68.
86. _1993b: Embalming the detritus of modernism: reply to Short, Ley, de Pater, and Dijkink. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie 84, 181-83.
87. Watts, M. 1995: A new deal in emotions': theory and practice and the crisis of development. In Crush, J., editor, Power of development. Routledge, 44-62.
88. Wisner, B. 1970: Introduction: on radical methodology. Antipode 2, 1-3.
89. Wynn, G. 1999: A fine balance? Geography at the millennium. The Canadian Geographer/Le Géographe canadien 43, 220-43.
90. Yapa, L. 1996: What causes poverty? A postmodern view. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 86, 707-28.
91. Ziai, A. 2004: The abivalence of post development: between reactionary populism and radical democracy. Third World Quarterly 25, 1045-60.