|
Volumn 20, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 605-617
|
Recent thinking about end of life issues
|
Author keywords
acts; assisted dying; assisted suicide; autonomy; best interests; doctrine of double effect; end of life; euthanasia; Mental Capacity; omissions; PVS; quality of life; right to die; right to life; sanctity of life; self determination; suicide; withdrawing; withholding
|
Indexed keywords
ACTIVE EUTHANASIA;
ARTIFICIAL FEEDING;
ARTIFICIAL VENTILATION;
CEREBELLAR ATAXIA;
HUMAN;
INTENSIVE CARE UNIT;
LEGAL ASPECT;
LEGAL LIABILITY;
MEDICAL DECISION MAKING;
MEDICAL ETHICS;
MENTAL CAPACITY;
NEWBORN INTENSIVE CARE;
PATIENT AUTONOMY;
PATIENT RIGHT;
PRIORITY JOURNAL;
QUALITY OF LIFE;
RELIGION;
REVIEW;
SUICIDE;
TERMINAL CARE;
TREATMENT INDICATION;
TREATMENT REFUSAL;
TREATMENT WITHDRAWAL;
UNITED KINGDOM;
CHILD;
CHILD, PRESCHOOL;
GREAT BRITAIN;
HUMANS;
INFANT, NEWBORN;
INTENSIVE CARE;
INTENSIVE CARE UNITS;
MENTAL COMPETENCY;
PERSONAL AUTONOMY;
PHYSICIAN'S ROLE;
QUALITY OF LIFE;
VALUE OF LIFE;
WITHHOLDING TREATMENT;
|
EID: 33751397432
PISSN: 15216896
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1016/j.bpa.2006.10.004 Document Type: Review |
Times cited : (2)
|
References (36)
|