Seasonal response function for daily streamflow investigation

Physics and Chemistry of the Earth

Volumn 31, Issue 18, 2006, Pages 1107-1117

  Longobardi, Antonia ^a   Villani, Paolo ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SALERNO   (Italy)

Author keywords

Conceptual approach; Rainfall runoff; Seasonal variability; Transfer functions

Indexed keywords

MATHEMATICAL MODELS; NONLINEAR SYSTEMS; RAIN; RIVERS; RUNOFF; STREAM FLOW; TIME VARYING SYSTEMS; TRANSFER FUNCTIONS;

CONCEPTUAL APPROACH; RAINFALL-RUNOFF; SEASONAL VARIABILITY;

HYDROLOGY;

RAINFALL-RUNOFF MODELING; SEASONAL VARIATION; STREAMFLOW; TIME SERIES ANALYSIS; TRANSFER FUNCTION;

EID: 33751395416     PISSN: 14747065     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.pce.2006.02.063     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Amendola, A.e., Storti, G., 1999. A threshold model for the rainfall-flow non-linearity, In: Proceedings of SCO99: Complex Model and Computationally Intensive Methods for Estimation and Forecast, pp. 179-184.
2. Amendola, A.e., Storti, G., 2001. Modelli non lineari per la previsione di serie storiche idrologiche, In: Proceedings of Metodi Statistici e Matematici per l'Analisi delle Serie Idrologiche, Roma, pp. 1-9.
3. Bernier J. Inventaire des modeles de processus stochastiques applicables a la description des debits journaliers des rivieres. Revue Inst. Intern. Stat. 38 1 (1970) 49-61
4. Beven K.J. Rainfall-Runoff Modelling, the Primer (2001), John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, England 360 p
5. Box G.E., and Jenkins G. Time Series Analysis: Forecasting and Control. Revised Ed. (1976), Holden-Day, San Francisco, California
6. Castellarin A., Burn D.H., and Brath A. Assessing the effectiveness of hydrological similarity measures for flood frequency analysis. J. Hydrol. 241 (2001) 270-285
7. Chanat, J.G., Norton, J.P., 2003. Interpreting hydrologic response using transfer function models with time-varying parameters: an example from the Virginia Blue Ridge. In: Proceeding of MODSIM 2003, Townsville, QLD, Australia, vol. 2, pp. 933-938.
8. Claps, P., Murrone, F., 1993. Univariate conceptual-stochastic model for spring runoff simulation. In: Proceeding of the International Conference on Modeling and Simulation, IASTED, Pittsburgh, pp. 491-494.
9. Cowpertwait P.S.P., and O'Connell P.E. A Neyman-Scott shot noise model for the generation of daily streamflow time series. In: O'Kane J.P. (Ed). Advances in Theoretical Hydrology (1992), Elsevier, The Netherlands 254 Part A, Chap. 6
10. Grayson R.B., Western A.W., and Chiew F.H.S. Preferred states in spatial soil moisture patterns: local and nonlocal controls. Water Resour. Res. 33 12 (1997) 2897-2908
11. Jackeman A.J., Littlewood I.G., and Whitehead P.G. Computational of the instantaneous unit hydrograph and identifiable component flows with application to two small upland catchments. J. Hydrol. 117 (1990) 275-300
12. Jakeman A.J., and Hornberger G.M. How much complexity is warranted in a rainfall-runoff model?. Water Resour. Res. 29 8 (1993) 2637-2649
13. Longobardi, A., Villani, P., Grayson, R.B., Western, W.A., 2003. On the relationship between runoff coefficient and catchment initial conditions. In: Proceeding of MODSIM 2003, Townsville, QLD, Australia, vol. 2, pp. 867-872.
14. Mardia K.V., and Jupp P.E. Directional Statistics (2000), John Wiley & Sons 429 pp
15. Murrone F., Rossi F., and Claps P. Conceptually-based shot noise modelling of streamflows at short time interval. Stochastic Hydrol. Hydraulics 11 6 (1997) 483-510
16. Nash J.E., and Sutcliffe J. River flow forecasting through conceptual models. Part 1. A discussion of principles. J. Hydrol. 10 (1970) 282-290
17. Norton, J.P., Chanat, J.G., 2003. Assessing rainfall-runoff records for time invariance using transfer function models with time-varying parameters. In: Proceeding of MODSIM 2003, Townsville, QLD, Australia, vol. 2, pp. 939-944.
18. Salas D.J., Delleur J.W., Yevjevich V., and Lane W.L. Applied Modelling of Hydrologic Time Series (1980), Water Resources Publications, Littleton, Colorado 484 p
19. Thomas H.E., and Fiering M.B. Mathematical synthesis of streamflow sequences for analysis of river basin by simulation. In: Maas A., et al. (Ed). Design of Water Resources Systems (1962), Harward Univ. Press. Cambridge, Mass 459-493
20. Tong H. Non-linear Time Series (1990), Oxford University Press, Oxford 580 p
21. Weiss G. Shot noise models for the generation of synthetic stream flow data. Water Resour. Res. 15 5 (1977) 1035-1043
22. Xia J., O'Connor K.M., Kachroo R.K., and Liang G.C. A non-linear perturbation model considering catchment wetness and its application in river flow forecasting. J. Hydrol. 200 (1997) 164-178
23. Xu Z.X., Schultz G.A., and Schumann A. A conceptually based stochastic point process model for daily streamflow generation. Hydrol. Process. 16 (2002) 3003-3017