Comparative study of scientific publications in Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences in Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Paraguay and Uruguay (1995-2004)

Arquivos Brasileiros de Oftalmologia

Volumn 69, Issue 5, 2006, Pages 719-723

  Ragghianti, Carla P ^a   Martínez, Rosa ^b   Martins, Jorge ^c   Gallo, Juan E ^a  

^a UNIVERSIDAD AUSTRAL   (Argentina)

^b Alcon Laboratorios Argentina   (Argentina)

^c Consejo Argentino de Oftalmología ^*  (Argentina)

Author keywords

Bibliometrics; Comparative study; Ophthalmology; Research; South America

Indexed keywords

ARGENTINA; ARTICLE; BRAZIL; CHILE; CLINICAL RESEARCH; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DATA ANALYSIS; EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; GEOGRAPHIC DISTRIBUTION; HEALTH SCIENCE; MEDLINE; OPHTHALMOLOGY; PARAGUAY; PRODUCTIVITY; PUBLICATION; SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE; TREND STUDY; URUGUAY;

EID: 33751394489     PISSN: 00042749     EISSN: 16782925     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1590/S0004-27492006000500019     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Sanchez-Carbonell X, Guardiola E, Belles A, Beranuy M. European Union scientific production on alcohol and drug misuse (1976-2000). Addiction. 2005;100(8):1166-74.
2. Fernández R. Análisis bibliométrico de la producción científica. Ciencia Hoy [serial on the Internet]. 1998 [cited: 2005 Sept 11]; 8(44):[about 9 p.] Available from: http://www.ciencia-hoy.retina.ar/hoy44/biblio1.htm.
3. Soteriades ES, Falagas ME. Comparison of amount of biomedical research originating from the European Union and the United States. BMJ. 2005; 331(7510):192-4.
4. Philipson L. Medical research activities, funding, and creativity in Europe: comparison with research in the United States. JAMA. 2005;294(11):1394-8
5. Rahman M, Sakamoto J, Fukui T. Japan's share of published research in ophthalmology. Jpn J Ophthalmol. 2003;47(2):221-4.
6. Ang A, Tong L, Bhan A. Analysis of publication trends in two internationally renowned ophthalmology journals. Br J Ophthalmol. 2001;85(12):1497-8.
7. Mandal K, Benson S, Fraser SG. The contribution to ophthalmic literature from different regions of the world. Int Ophthalmol. 2004;25(3):181-4.
8. Davis M, Wilson CS. Research contributions in ophthalmology: Australia's productivity. Clin Experiment Ophthalmol. 2003;31(4):286-93.
9. Pon JA, Carroll SC, McGhee CN. Analysis of New Zealand's research productivity in ophthalmology and vision science: 1993-2002. Clin Experiment Ophthalmol, 2004,32(6):607-13.
10. Sanz-Casado E, Suarez-Balseiro C, García-Zorita C, Martín-Moreno C, Lascurain-Sánchez ML. Metric studies of information: An approach towards a practical teaching method. Educ Inf. 2002;20(2):133-44.
11. United States National Library of Medicine. Journal selection for Medline fact sheet [text on the Internet]. Bethesda (MD): National Library of Medicine; 2005 [cited 2005 Jul 16]. Available from: http://www.nlm.nih.gov/pubs/factsheets/jsel.html.
12. Gehanno JF, Thirion B. How to select publications on occupational health: the usefulness of Medline and the impact factor. Occup Environ Med. 2000; 57(10):706-9.
13. Latin America: a growing presence. Science Watch [serial on the Internet]. 2001 [cited 2005 Sept 11]; 12(5):1-2. Available from: http://www.sciencewatch.com/sep-oct2001/sw_sep-oct2001_page1.htm.
14. Paraje G. Sadana R, Karam G. Public health. Increasing international gaps in health-related publications. Science. 2005; 308(5724):959-60.
15. Moreno-Montañés J. Trabajos españoles publicados en las revistas de oftalmología. Arch Soc Esp Oftalmol. 2003; 78(11):585.
16. Cañedo Andalia R, Arencibia RJ, Perezleo Solorzano L, Conill González C, Araújo Ruiz JA. La Colaboración Cochrane en Cuba: producción de ensayos clínicos en Iberoamérica. ACIMED [serial on the Internet]. 2003 [cited 2005 Aug 10]; 11(6): [about 19 p.]. Available from: http://scielo.sld.cu/ scielo.php?script=sci-arttext&pid=S1024-94352003000600004&1ng= es&nrm=iso&tlng=es.
17. Bicas HEA, Muccioli C, Goldchmit M, Campos MSQ, Dantas PEC, Bechara SJ, et al. Prestigiosa validação de nossos padrões editoriais. Arq Bras Oftalmol. 2005:68(1):5-6.