Automatic measurement of syntactic development in child language

ACL-05 - 43rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Proceedings of the Conference

Volumn , Issue , 2005, Pages 197-204

  Sagae, Kenji ^a   Lavie, Alon ^a   MacWhinney, Brian ^b  

^a Carnegie Mellon University ^*  (United States)

^b CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CLASSIFICATION (OF INFORMATION); COMPUTATIONAL LINGUISTICS;

ANNOTATION SCHEME; AUTOMATIC MEASUREMENTS; GRAMMATICAL RELATIONS; HIGH-PRECISION; LANGUAGE ACQUISITION; MEMORY-BASED LEARNING; STATISTICAL PARSER; SYNTACTIC INFORMATION;

SYNTACTICS;

EID: 33751384117     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.3115/1219840.1219865     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (16)

1. Edward J. Briscoe and John A. Carroll. 2002. Robust accurate statistical annotation of general text. Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation, (pp. 1499-1504). Las Palmas, Gran Canaria.
2. John A. Carroll and Edward J. Briscoe. 2002. High precision extraction of grammatical relations. Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Computational Linguistics, (pp. 134-140). Taipei, Taiwan.
3. Eugene Charniak. 2000. A maximum-entropy-inspired parser. In Proceedings of the First Annual Meeting of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics. Seattle, WA.
4. Michael Collins. 1996. A new statistical parser based on bigram lexical dependencies. Proceedings of the 34th Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (pp. 184-191). Santa Cruz, CA.
5. Walter Daelemans, Jacub Zavrel, Ko van der Sloot, and Antal van den Bosch. 2004. TiMBL: Tilburg Memory Based Learner, version 5.1, Reference Guide. ILK Research Group Technical Report Series no. 04-02, 2004.
6. T. Klee and M. D. Fitzgerald. 1985. The relation between grammatical development and mean length of utterance in morphemes. Journal of Child Language, 12, 251-269.
7. Dan Klein and Christopher D. Manning. 2002. A generative constituent-context model for improved grammar induction. Proceedings of the 40th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (pp. 128-135).
8. Dekang Lin. 1998. Dependency-based evaluation of MINIPAR. In Proceedings of the Workshop on the Evaluation of Parsing Systems. Granada, Spain.
9. Steve H. Long and Ron W. Channell. 2001. Accuracy of four language analysis procedures performed automatically. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 10(2).
10. Steven H. Long, Marc E. Fey, and Ron W. Channell. 2004. Computerized Profiling (Version 9.6.0). Cleveland, OH: Case Western Reserve University.
11. Brian MacWhinney. 2000. The CHILDES Project: Tools for Analyzing Talk. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
12. Mitchel P. Marcus, Beatrice Santorini, and Mary Ann Marcinkiewics. 1993. Building a large annotated corpus of English: The Penn Treebank. Computational Linguistics, 19.
13. Joakim Nivre and Mario Scholz. 2004. Deterministic dependency parsing of English text. Proceedings of International Conference on Computational Linguistics (pp. 64-70). Geneva, Switzerland.
14. Christophe Parisse and Marie-Thrse Le Normand. 2000. Automatic disambiguation of the morphosyntax in spoken language corpora. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 32, 468-481.
15. Kenji Sagae, Alon Lavie, and Brian MacWhinney. 2004. Adding Syntactic annotations to transcripts of parentchild dialogs. Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC 2004). Lisbon, Portugal.
16. Hollis S. Scarborough. 1990. Index of Productive Syntax. In Applied Psycholinguistics, 11, 1-22.