On adaptive sampling for single and multi-response Bayesian surrogate models

Proceedings of the ASME Design Engineering Technical Conference

Volumn 2006, Issue , 2006, Pages

  Romero, David A ^a   Amon, Cristina H ^b   Finger, Susan ^b  

^a UNIVERSIDAD DEL ZULIA   (Venezuela)

^b CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Adaptive sampling; Cross validation; Latin hypercubes; Maximum entropy sampling; Metamodels; Sequential sampling; Surrogate models

Indexed keywords

ADAPTIVE CONTROL SYSTEMS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DATA REDUCTION; MATHEMATICAL MODELS;

ADAPTIVE SAMPLING; CROSS-VALIDATION; LATIN HYPERCUBES; MAXIMUM ENTROPY SAMPLING; METAMODELS; SEQUENTIAL SAMPLING; SURROGATE MODELS;

SAMPLING;

EID: 33751341849     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1115/detc2006-99210     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (34)

1. Ulrich, K.T. and S. T. Eppinger, Product Design and Development, l ed. 1995: McGraw-Hill. 289.
2. Wilson, B., et al., Efficient Pareto Frontier Exploration using Surrogate Approximations. Optimization and Engineering, 2001. 2: p. 31-50.
3. Das, I. and J.E. Dennis, A Closer Look at the Drawbacks of Minimizing Weighted Sums of Objectives for Pareto Set Generation in Multicriteria Optimization Problems. Structural Optimization, 1997.14: p. 63-69.
4. Torczon, V. and M.W. Trosset, Using Approximations to Accelerate Engineering Design Optimization. 1998, Institute for Computer Applications in Science and Engineering, NASA Langley Research Center: Hampton, VA. p. 1-15.
5. Simpson, T.W., et al., Metamodels for Computer-Based Engineering Design: Survey and Recommendations. Engineering with Computers, 2001. 17: p. 129-150.
6. Simpson, T.W., et al., Kriging Models for Global Approximation in Simulation-based Multidisciplinary Design Optimization. AIAA Journal, 2001. 39(12): p. 2233-2241.
7. Jin, R., X. Du, and W. Chen, The Use of Metamodeling Techniques for Optimization under Uncertainty. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 2003. 25: p. 99-116.
8. McKay, M.D., R.J. Beckman, and W.J. Conover, A Comparison of Three Methods for Selecting Values of Input Variables in the Analysis of Output from a Computer Code. Technometrics, 1979. 21(2): p. 239-245.
9. Owen, A.B., Orthogonal Arrays for Computer Experiments, Integration and Visualization. Statistica Sinica, 1992. 2: p. 439-452.
10. Shewry, M.C. and H.P Wynn, Maximum Entropy Sampling. Journal of Applied Statistics, 1987. 14(2): p. 165-170.
11. Mukherjee, B., On Sampling Designs for Integral Estimation of a Random Process. Communications in Statistics, 2003. 32(8): p. 1647-1663.
12. Osio, I.G., and Amon, C. H., Maximin Orthogonal Arrays for Large-Scale Computational Experiments, in Submitted to Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference. 1998, Institute for Complex Engineered Systems, Carnegie Mellon University: Pittsburgh, USA.
13. Jin, R., W. Chen, and A. Sudjianto. On Sequential Sampling for Global Metamodeling in Engineering Design. in ASME 2002 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences. 2002. Montreal, Canada: American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME).
14. Wang, G.G. and S. Shan. An Efficient Pareto Set Identification Approach for Multi-Objective Optimization on Black-Box Functions, in ASME Design Engineering Technical Conferences, Paper No. DETC2004-57194. 2004. Salt Lake City, Utah, USA: ASME.
15. Jones, D.R., M. Schonlau, and W.J. Welch, Efficient Global Optimization of Expensive Black-Box Functions. Journal of Global Optimization, 1998. 13: p. 455-492.
16. Turner, C.J., M.I. Campbell, and R.H. Crawford. Generic Sequential Sampling for Metamodel Approximations, in 2005 ASME Design Engineering Technical Conferences, Paper No. DETC2003/CIE-48230. 2003. Chicago, IL, USA.
17. Turner, C.J., M.I. Campbell, and R.H. Crawford. Metamodel Defined Multidimensional Embedded Sequential Sampling Criteria, in 2004 ASME Design Engineering Technical Conferences, Paper No. DETC2004-57722. 2004. Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
18. Sasena, M., P. Papalambros, and P. Goovaerts, Exploration ofMetamodeling Sampling Criteria for Constrained Global Optimization. Engineering Optimization, 2002. 34: p. 263-278.
19. Chaloner, K. and I. Verdinelli, Bayesian Experimental Design: A Review. Statistical Science, 1995. 10(3): p. 273-304.
20. Lin, Y., et al. A Sequential Exploratory Experimental Design Method: Development of Appropriate Empirical Models in Design, in ASME Design Engineering Technical Conferences, Paper No. DETC2004-57527. 2004. Salt Lake City, Utah, USA: ASME.
21. Kleijnen, J.P.C. and W.C.M. van Beers, Application-driven Sequential Designs for Simulation Experiments: Kriging Metamodeling. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 2004. (in press).
22. Romero, D., C.H. Amon, and S. Finger, Multi-Stage, Multi-Response Bayesian Surrogate Models for Engineering Design, submitted to the Transactions of the ASME, Journal of Mechanical Design, 2004.
23. Davis, G.J. and M.D. Morris, Six Factors Which Affect the Condition Number of Matrices Associated with Kriging. Mathematical Geology, 1997. 29(5): p. 669-683.
24. Oliver, D.S., Calculation of the Inverse of the Covariance. Mathematical Geology, 1998. 30(7): p. 911-933.
25. Sacks, J., et al., Design and Analysis of Computer Experiments. Statistical Science, 1989. 4(4): p. 409-435.
26. Ver Hoef, J.M. and N. Cressie, Multivariable Spatial Prediction. Mathematical Geology, 1993. 25(2): p. 219-240.
27. Johnson, R.A. and D.W. Wichern, Applied Multivariate Statistical Analysis. 2nd Edition ed. Prentice Hall Series in Statistics. 1988, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, USA.: Prentice Hall. 607.
28. Cressie, N., Statistics for Spatial Data. Probability and Mathematical Statistics. 1991: John Wiley & Sons.
29. Cressie, N. and C.K. Wikle, The Variance-Based Cross-Variogram: You Can Add Apples and Oranges. Mathematical Geology, 1998. 30(7): p. 789-799.
30. Osio, I.G and C.H. Amon, An Engineering Design Methodology with Multistage Bayesian Surrogates and Optimal Sampling. Research in Engineering Design, 1996. 8: p. 189-206.
31. Martin, J.D. and T.W. Simpson. On the Use of Kriging Models to Approximate Deterministic Computer Models, in ASME 2004 Design Engineering Technical Conferences, Paper No. DETC2004-57300. 2004. Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
32. Osio, I.G., Multistage Bayesian Surrogates and Optimal Sampling for Engineering Design and Process Improvement, in Mechanical Engineering. 1996, Ph.D. Thesis, Dept. of Mechanical Engineering, Carnegie Mellon University: Pittsburgh, PA. p. 114.
33. Pacheco, J.E., C.H. Amon, and S. Finger, Bayesian Surrogates Applied to Conceptual Stages of the Engineering Design Process. Journal Of Mechanical Design, Transactions of the ASME, 2003.125: p. 664-672.
34. Coleman, T., M.A. Branch, and A. Grace, MatLab - Optimization Toolbox User's Guide. 2002, The MathWorks Inc.