Erratum: The Hissom closure in Oklahoma: Errors and interpretation problems in Conroy et al. (2003) (Mental Retardation)

Mental Retardation

Volumn 44, Issue 5, 2006, Pages 353-369

  Walsh, Kevin K ^a   Kastner, Theodore A ^b,c  

^a Developmental Disabilities Health Alliance Inc   (United States)

^b RUTGERS NEW JERSEY MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^c Developmental Disabilities Health Alliance Inc   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; HEALTH CARE FACILITY; HEALTH SERVICE; HUMAN; MENTAL DEFICIENCY; MIDDLE AGED; RESIDENTIAL CARE; SELF CARE; UNITED STATES;

ADULT; HEALTH FACILITY CLOSURE; HEALTH SERVICES NEEDS AND DEMAND; HUMANS; MENTAL RETARDATION; MIDDLE AGED; OKLAHOMA; RESIDENTIAL TREATMENT; SELF CARE;

EID: 33751315024     PISSN: 00476765     EISSN: 00476765     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1352/0047-6765(2006)44[353:THCIOE]2.0.CO;2     Document Type: Erratum

References (14)

1. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the social sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
2. Conroy, J. W. (1996, February). The Hissom Outcomes Study: A report on six years of movement into supported living: The people who moved from Hissom Memorial Center to community: Are they better off? (Brief Rep. No. 1). Ardmore, PA: Center for Outcome Analysis.
3. Conroy, J., Spreat, S., Yuskauskas, A., & Elks, M. (2003). The Hissom closure outcomes study: A report on six years of movement to supported living. Mental Retardation, 41, 263-275.
4. Conroy, J., Efthimiou, J., & Lemanowicz, J. (1982). A matched comparison of the developmental growth of institutionalized and deinstitutionalized mentally retarded clients. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 86, 581-587.
5. Feingold, A. (1995). The additive effects of differences in central tendency and variability are important in comparisons between groups. American Psychologist, 50, 5-13.
6. Felce, D., & Perry, J. (1996). Adaptive behavior gains in ordinary housing for people with intellectual disabilities. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 9, 101-114.
7. Fowler, F. J. (1993). Survey research methods (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
8. Freeland, K. E., & Carney, R. M. (1992). Data management and accountability in behavioral and biomedical research. American Psychologist, 47, 640-645.
9. Fullerton, A., Douglass, M., & Dodder, R. A. (1999). A reliability study of measures assessing the impact of deinstitutionalization. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 20, 387-400.
10. Jones, J., Conroy, J. W., & Spreat, S. (1999, June). Costs of support for the former residents of Hissom Memorial Center (Rep. No. 8 in the Oklahoma Outcome Series). Submitted to Oklahoma Department of Human Services, Developmental Disabilities Services Division. Rosemont, PA: Center for Outcome Analysis.
11. Pawlarczyk, D., & Shumacher, K. (1983). Concurrent validity of the Behavior Development Survey. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 87, 619-626.
12. Rosnow, R. L., & Rosenthal, R. (1989). Statistical procedures and the justification of knowledge in psychological science. American Psychologist, 44, 1276-1284.
13. Spreat, S., Conroy, J. W., & Fullerton, A. (2004). Statewide longitudinal survey or psychotropic medication use for persons with mental retardation: 1994 to 2000. American Journal on Mental Retardation, 109, 322-331.
14. Van Kammen, W. B., & Stouthamer-Loeber, M. (1998). Practical aspects of interview data collection and data management. In L. Bickman & D. J. Rog (Eds.), Handbook of applied social research methods (pp. 375-398). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.