A critical look at the use of computing technologies in planning education the case of the spreadsheet in introductory methods

Journal of Planning Education and Research

Volumn 21, Issue 4, 2002, Pages 406-418

  Urey, Gwen ^a  

^a CALIFORNIA STATE POLYTECHNIC UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMMUNICATION; COMPUTER SYSTEM; EDUCATION; EDUCATIONAL DEVELOPMENT; SPREADSHEET; STUDENT; THEORETICAL STUDY;

EID: 33751303430     PISSN: 0739456X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/07356X021004005     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Bradley, W. James, and Kurt C. Schaefer. 1998. The uses and misuses of data and models: The mathematization of the human sciences. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
2. Bryson, Mary, and Suzanne de Castell. 1994. Telling tales out of school: Modernist, critical, and postmodern "true stories" about educational computing. Journal of Educational Computing Research 10 (3): 199-221.
3. Campbell, Heather. 1996. A social interactionist perspective on computer implementation. Journal of the American Planning Association 62 (1): 99-107.
4. Campbell, Heather, and Ian Masser. 1995. GIS and organizations. Bristol, PA: Taylor and Francis.
5. Cartwright, Timothy J. 1993. Modeling the world in a spreadsheet. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
6. Dugdale, Sharon, Elyon DeKoven, and Mi-Kyung Ju. 1998. Computer course enrollment, home computer access, and gender: Relationships to high school students' success with computer spreadsheet use for problem solving in pre-algebra. Journal of Educational Computing Research 18 (1): 49-62.
7. Esnard, A. M., and E. B. MacDougall. 1997. Integrating planning theory with GIS courses. Journal of Planning Education and Research 17: 55-62.
8. Forester, John. 1989. Planning in the face of power. Berkeley: University of California Press.
9. Godschalk, David, and Gerard McMahon. 1992. Staffing the revolution: GIS education for planners. Journal of Planning Education and Research 11 (3): 216-26.
10. Harris, Britton. 1992. A view of planning and planning education. Journal of Planning Education and Research 11 (2): 151-52.
11. Harris, Britton, and Michael Batty. 1993. Locational models, geographic information and planning support systems. Journal of Planning Education and Research 12 (3): 184-98.
12. Innes, Judith E. 1998. Information in communicative planning. Journal of the American Planning Association 64 (1): 52-64.
13. Kaufman, Sanda, and Robert Simons. 1995. Quantitative and research methods in planning: Are schools teaching what practitioners practice? Journal of Planning Education and Research 15 (1): 17-33.
14. Klosterman, Richard E. 1987. The politics of computer-aided planning. Town Planning Review 58 (4): 441-51.
15. _. 1990. Community analysis and planning techniques. Savage, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
16. Lowry, I. S. 1983. Designing readable and persuasive tables. Series P-6945. Santa Monica: Rand Corp.
17. Myers, Dowell. 1992. Analysis with local census data. Boston: Academic Press.
18. Patton, Carl V., and David S. Sawicki. 1993. Basic methods of policy analysis and planning. 2d ed. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
19. Poster, Mark. 1990. The mode of information. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
20. Postman, Neil. 1995. The end of education: Redefining the value of school New York: Knopf.
21. Schneiderman, Ben, and Anne Rose. 1997. Social impact statements: Engaging public participation in information technology design. In Human values and the design of computer technology, edited by Batya Friedman, 107-14. New York: Cambridge University Press.
22. Susman, Ellen B. 1998. Cooperative learning: A review of factors that increase the effectiveness of cooperative computer-based instruction. Journal of Educational Computing Research 18 (4): 303-22.
23. Winograd, Terry, and Fernando Flores. 1986. Understanding computers and cognition. Boston: Ablex.