Mark my words: Self and peer assessment as an aid to learning

European Journal of Engineering Education

Volumn 28, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 103-116

  Edward, Norrie S ^a  

^a ROBERT GORDON UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ENGINEERING EDUCATION;

LEARNING EXPERIENCES; LEARNING OUTCOME; PEER ASSESSMENT;

EDUCATION;

EID: 33751300856     PISSN: 03043797     EISSN: 14695898     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/0304379031000065207     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. BECKER, H., 1995, Making the grade revisited. In H. S. BECKER, B. GEER and E. C. HUGHES (eds), Making the Grade (New Brunswick: Transaction, Inc.), pp. xii–xx.
2. BECKER, H., GEER, B. and HUGHES, E. C. 1995, Making the Grade: The Academic Side of College Life, (New York: Wiley, 1968, new edition, 1995, with new introduction).
3. BECKER, H., GEER, B., HUGHES, E. and STRAUSS, A., 1961, Boys in White: Student Culture in Medical School (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).
4. BOUD, D. and FALCHIKOV, N., 1989, Quantitative studies of student self-assessment in higher education. Higher Education, 18, 529–549.
5. BROCKBANK, A. and MCGILL, I., 1998, Facilitating Reflective Learning in Higher Education (Bucks: SRHE and The Open University Press).
6. EDWARD, N. S., 2001, A new model of the formation of the professional engineer. Paper 8 B5 presented at the International Conference on Engineering Education, Oslo, 6–10 August.
7. FRIZE, M., SEHEULT, D., MCLEAN, A. and ROY, J., 1993, Engineering: Changing market, changing skills. Panel at the Association of Professional Engineers of New Brunswick’s Annual Meeting, February, and APENB Bulletin June.
8. GOLD et al., 1991, 8. Assessing students, p4, http:// www.chelt.ac.uk/el/philg/gdn/ch8.htm, 30/03/02
9. LAURILLARD, D., 1993, Rethinking University Teaching: A Framework for the Effective Use of Educational Technology (London: Routledge).
10. MARTON, F., HOUNSELL, D. and ENTWISTLE, N., 1997, The Experience of Learning: Implications for Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 2nd edn (Edinburgh: Scottish Academic Press).
11. MOWL, G., 2002, Innovative student assessment, University of Northumbria http://www.lgu.ac.uk/deliberations/assessment/mowl.html
12. OSBORNE, J. W., 1999, A behavioral measure of metacognition for teachers. Paper presented at the national meeting of the American Education Research Association (AERA), Montreal, April.
13. OSBORNE, J., 1998, Measuring metacognition in the classroom: A review of currently available measures. Department of Educational Psychology, http://faculty-staff.ou.edu/O/Jason.W.Osborne-1/otherfiles/msRER-shorter.doc
14. OSMAN, M. E. and HANNAFIN, M. J., 1992, Metacognition research and theory: Analysis and implications for instructional design. Educational Technology, Research, and Discussion, 40, 83–99.
15. PRESSLEY, M., WOLOSHYN, V., LYSYNCHUK, L. M., MARTIN, V., WOOD, E. and WILLOUGHBY, T., 1990, A primer of research on cognitive strategy instruction: The important issues and how to address them. Educational Psychology Review, 2, 1–58.
16. SCHRAW, G. and MOSHMAN, D., 1995, Metacognitive theories. Educational Psychology Review, 7, 351–371.
17. STERNBERG, R. J., 1984, Toward a triarchic theory of human intelligence. The Brain and Behavioral Sciences, 7, 269–315.
18. TANNER, H. and JONES, S., 1994, Using peer assessment to develop modelling skills with students aged 11 to 16: A socio-constructive view. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 27, 413–431.