Researches and developments of biomimetics in tribology

Chinese Science Bulletin

Volumn 51, Issue 22, 2006, Pages 2681-2689

  Dai, Zhendong ^a   Tong, Jin ^b   Ren, Luquan ^b  

^a NANJING UNIVERSITY OF AERONAUTICS AND ASTRONAUTICS   (China)

^b JILIN UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Adhesion; Biological tribology; Biomimetic tribology; Friction; Self cleaning

Indexed keywords

ANIMALIA;

EID: 33751300462     PISSN: 10016538     EISSN: 18619541     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11434-006-2184-z     Document Type: Review

References (35)

1. Czichos H. Tribology, A system Approach to the Science and Technology of Friction, Lubrication and Wear. Elsevier, 1979
2. Dickinson M H, Farley C T, Full R J, et al. How animals move: An integrative view. Science, 2000, 288(7): 100-106
3. th Xiangshan Science Conference, Beijing, Xiangshan, Dec. 11-13, 2003
4. Furey M J, Burkhardt B M. Biotribology: Friction, wear and lubrication of natural synovial joints. Lubr Sci, 1997, 9(3): 255-271
5. Zhang Z H. Swimming like shark: High tech makes swimming-cloth wonderful. Recent Dev Sci Techn Abroad. 2004, 8: 24-25
6. Bohn H F, Federle W. Insect aquaplaning: Nepenthes pitcher plants capture prey with the peristome, a fully wettable water-lubricated anisotropic surface. PNAS, 2004, 101(39): 14138-14143
7. Lu Y X. Significance and progress of bionics. J Bionic Eng, 2004, 1(1): 1-3
8. Barthlott W, Neinhuis C. Purity of the sacred lotus, or escape from contamination in biological surfaces. Planta, 1997, 202: 1-8
9. Neinhuis C, Barthlott W. Characterization and distribution of water-repellent, self-cleaning plant surfaces. Annals of Botany, 1997, 79: 667-677
10. Gao X, Jiang L. Water-repellent legs of water striders. Nature, 2004, 432: 36
11. Wagner T, Neinhuis C, Barthlott W. Wettability and contaminability of insect wings as a function of their surface sculptures. Acta Zoologica (Stockholm), 1996, 77(3): 213-225
12. Tong J, Sun J, Chen D, et al. Geometrical features and wettability of Dung beetles and potential biomimetic engineering applications in tillage implements. Soil & Tillage Res, in press
13. Han J B, Zhang L B, Li B G. Electronic sensing system for real time identification of the tire-road adhesion. Vehicle and Power Tech, 2005, (2): 62-64
14. Li C X, Liu W L, Sun H Y. Focal adhesion and its function in cell migration. Foreign Medical Sciences. Section of Pathophysipogy and Clinical Medicine, 2002, 22(6): 583-586
15. Dai Z D, Gorb S N, Schwarz U. Roughness-dependent friction force of the tarsal claw system in the beetle Pachnoda marginata (Coleoptera, Scarabaeidae). J Exp Biol, 2002, 205: 2479-88
16. Jiao Y K, Gorb N S, Scherge M. Adhesion measured on the attachment pads of Tettigonia viridissima (Orthoptera Insecta). J Exp Biol, 2000, 203: 1887-1895
17. Dai Z D, Gorb S N. Study on the microstructure of Locust's pad and FEM analysis of its contact. J Shanghai Jiaotong Univ, 2003, 37(1): 66-69
18. Hasenfuss I. The adhesive devices in larvae of Lepidoptera (Insecta, Pterygota). Zoomorphology, 1999, 119(3): 143-162
19. Gao H, Yao H. Shape insensitive optimal adhesion of nanoscale fibrillar structures. PNAS, 2004, 101(21): 7851-7856
20. Peressadko A G, Gorb S N. Surface profile and friction force generated by insect. In: Proceedings of the First International Industrial Conference Bionik, 2004. 257-263
21. Autumn K, Liang Y A, Hsieh S T, et al. Adhesive force of a single gecko foot-hair. Nature, 2000, 405: 681-685
22. Johnson K L, Kendall K, Roberts A D. Surface energy and the contact of elastic solids. Proc R Soc Lond A, 1971, 324: 301-313
23. Gorb S N, Peressadko A, Spolenak R, et al. Biological hairy attachment devices as a protptype for artificial adhesive systems. In: Proceedings of the First International Industrial Conference Bionik, 2004. 237-242
24. Sitti M, Fearing R S. Nanomolding based fabrication of synthetic gecko foot-hairs. IEEE Conference on Nanotechnology, 2002, Aug. 26-28, Washington DC
25. Geim A K, Dubonos S V, Grigorieva I V, et al. Microfabricated adhesive mimicking gecko foot-hair. Nat Mater, 2003, 2(7): 461-463
26. Sun J R, Guo C, Cheng H, et al. Comparison between the setae of the dong beetle Coprisochus and the gecko Gekko gecko and the effects of deformation on their functions. Acta Zoologica Sinica, 2005, 51(4): 761-767
27. Rechenberg I. Tribological characteristics of sandfish. Nature as Engineer and Teacher: Learning for Technology From Biological Systems, Shanghai, Oct.8-11, 2003
28. Tong J, Moayad B Z, Ren L, et al. Biomimetics in soft terrain machines: A review. Int Agr Eng J, 2004, 13(3): 71-86
29. Ball P. Engineering shark skin and other solutions. Nature, 1999, 400: 507-509
30. Viswanath P R. Aircraft viscous drag reduction using riblets. Prog Aerospace Sci, 2002, 38: 571-600
31. Carpenter P. The right sort of roughness. Nature, 1997, 388: 713-714
32. Robert J P. Drag reduction: An industrial challenge. Special Course on Skin Friction Drag Reduction. AGARD- R-786, 1992, Paper No. 2
33. Igarashi T. Drag reduction of a square prism by flow control using a small rod. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodynamics, 1997, 69-71: 141-153
34. Sirovich L, Karlsson S. Turbulent drag reduction by passive mechanisms. Nature, 1997, 388: 753-755
35. Balasubramanian A K, Miller A C, Rediniotis O K. Microstructured hydrophobic skin for hydrodynamic drag reduction. AIAA J, 2004, 42(2): 411-414