A comparison of grinding processes and wet feeding of wheat-based diets on AME, production, and gastrointestinal tract development of broiler chicks

Canadian Journal of Animal Science

Volumn 86, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 255-261

  Afsharmanesh, M ^a   Scott, T A ^b   Silversides, F G ^c  

^a SHAHID BAHONAR UNIVERSITY OF KERMAN   (Iran)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY   (Australia)

^c AGASSIZ RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTRE   (Canada)

Author keywords

AME; Broiler; Gut development; Wet feeding; Wheat

Indexed keywords

TRITICUM AESTIVUM;

EID: 33751295119     PISSN: 00083984     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4141/A05-072     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. American Society of Agricultural Engineers. 1983. Methods of determining and expressing fineness of feed materials by sieving. American Society of Agricultural Engineers, St. Joseph, MI. 325 pp.
2. Behnke, K. C. 1983. Measuring and defining grind size of feedstuffs. Pages C1-C11 in Proceedings First International Symposium on Grind Size Reduction in the Feed Industry. Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS.
3. Canadian Council on Animal Care. 1993. Guide to the care and use of experimental animals. Vol. 1. 2nd ed. CCAC, Ottawa, ON.
4. Canadian Wheat Board. 2001. 2000-01 variety survey results. [Online] Available: http://www.cwb.ca/publicat/varsurv/results00.htm [2001 Mar. 24].
5. Grant, L. A. 1998. Effects of starch isolation, drying and grinding techniques on its gelatinization and retrogradation properties. Cereal Chem. 75: 590-594.
6. Leeson, S. and Summers, J. D. 2001. Scott's nutrition of the chicken. University Books, Guelph, ON.
7. Lentle, R. G. 2004. Physical properties of digesta that may influence feed conversion efficiency. Proc. New Zealand Poult. Ind. Conf. 7: 10-19.
8. Lentle, R. G. 2005. The macrobiophysics of digestion: Implications for the poultry industry. Aust. Poult. Sci. Symp. 17: 163-170.
9. Littell, R. C., Freund, R. J. and Spector, P. C. 1991. SAS® system for linear models. 3rd ed. SAS® series in statistical applications. SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, NC.
10. McCracken, K. J. and Quintin, G. 2000. Metabolisable energy content of diets and broiler performance as affected by wheat specific weight and enzyme supplementation. Br. Poult. Sci. 41: 332-342.
11. National Research Council. 1994. Nutrient requirements of poultry. 9th ed. National Academy Press Washington, DC.
12. Nir, I., Hillel, R., Shefet, G. and Nitsan, Z. 1994. Effect of grain grind size on performance. 2. grain texture interactions. Poult. Sci. 73: 781-791.
13. Reece, F. N., Lott, B. D. and Deaton, J. W. 1985. The effects of feed form, grinding method, energy level, and gender on broiler performance in a moderate (21°C) environment. Poult. Sci. 64: 1834-1839.
14. Savory, C. J. 1975. Effects of group size on the feeding behaviour and growth of chicks. Br. Poult. Sci. 16: 343-350.
15. Scholten, R. H. J., Van Der Peet-Schwering, C. M. C., Verstegen, M. W. A., Den Hartog, L. A., Schrama, J. W. and Vesseur, P. C. 1999. Fermented co-products and fermented compound diets for pigs: a review. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 82: 1-19.
16. Scott, T. A. 2000. Observation on variability of feed intake of Western Canadian wheat and barley-based diets by broiler chicks. [CD-ROM] World's Poult. Cong., August 2000, Montreal, QC.
17. Scott, T. A. 2002. Impact of wet feeding wheat-based diets with or without enzyme on broiler chick performance. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 82: 409-417.
18. Scott, T. A. and Silversides, F. G. 2003. Defining the effects of wheat type, water inclusion level, and wet-diet restriction on variability in performance of broilers fed wheat-based diets with added water. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 83: 265-272.
19. Scott, T. A., Silversides, F. G., Classen, H. L., Swift, M. L. and Bedford, M. R. 1998. Effect of cultivar and environment on the feeding value of Western Canadian wheat and barley samples with and without enzyme supplementation. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 78: 649-656.
20. Sharma, R., Fernandez, F., Hinton, M. and Schumacher, U. 1997. The influence of diet on the mucin carbohydrates in the chick intestinal tract. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 53: 935-942.
21. Whitehead, A. and Scott T. A. 2005. Fermented feed for broilers. Aust. Poult. Sci. Symp. pp. 303-304
22. Viveros, A., Brenes A., Pizzaro, M. and Castano, M. 1994. Effect of enzyme supplementation of a diet based on barley, and autoclave treatment, on apparent digestibility, growth performance and gut morphology of broilers. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 48: 237-251.
23. Yasar, S. 1998. Assessment of the nutritional effects of water treatment of food for poultry. Ph.D. thesis. University of Leeds, Leeds, UK. 228 pp.
24. Yasar, S. and Forbes, J. M. 1999. Performance and gastro-intestinal response of broiler chickens fed on cereal grain-based foods soaked in water. Br. Poult. Sci. 40: 65-76.
25. Yasar, S. and Forbes, J. M. 2000. Enzyme supplementation of dry and wet wheat-based foods for broiler chickens: performance and gut responses. Br. J. Nutr. 84: 297-307.
26. Yasar, S. and Tuzun, C. G. 2000. Performance and gut size of Japanese quails fed with dry or wet foods of a commercial broiler diet. Int. Anim. Nutr. Cong. 641-644.
27. Yasar, S., Forbes, J. M. and Mclean, D. 1996. Gut histo-morphology of broiler chickens with wet feeding. Br. Poult. Sci. 37: S35.