Letter to the Editor [1]

Construction Management and Economics

Volumn 24, Issue 11, 2006, Pages 1107-1109

  Lingard, Helen ^a   Rowlinson, Steve ^b  

^a RMIT UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG   (Hong Kong)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

PROJECT MANAGEMENT;

CONSTRUCTION;

EID: 33751262113     PISSN: 01446193     EISSN: 1466433X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01446190601001620     Document Type: Letter

References (5)

1. Costello AB, Osborne JW. 2005. Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: Four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation. 10. (7). p. 7. available at http://pareonline.net/pdf/v10n7.pdf (accessed 25 October 2006)
2. Guadagnoli, E. and Velicer, W. F. (1988) Relation of sample size to the stability of component patterns. Psychological Bulletin, 103, pp. 265-75.
3. MacCallum, R. C. and Widaman, K. F. and Zhang, S. and Hong, S. (1999) Sample size in factor analysis. Psychological Methods, 4, pp. 84-99.
4. Osborne JW, Costello AB. 2004. Sample size and subject to item ratio in principal components analysis. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation. 9. (11). p. 8. available at http://pareonline.net/pdf/ v10n7.pdf (accessed 25 October 2006)
5. Rowlinson S, Lingard HC. 2006. Sample size in factor analysis: Why size matters. Teaching note in Student Resources, available at http://rec.hku.hk/steve/studentarea.htm (accessed 25 October 2006)