The cervix as a biomechanical structure

Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology

Volumn 28, Issue 6, 2006, Pages 745-749

  House, M ^a   Socrate, S ^b  

^a TUFTS MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b USA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOMECHANICS; CERCLAGE; CERVICAL DEFORMATION; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; ECHOGRAPHY; HUMAN; OSTEOPOROSIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; STRENGTH; UTERINE CERVIX; UTERINE CERVIX DISEASE; UTERUS;

BIOMECHANICS; CERCLAGE, CERVICAL; CERVIX UTERI; FEMALE; HUMANS; PREGNANCY; UTERINE CERVICAL INCOMPETENCE;

EID: 33751255062     PISSN: 09607692     EISSN: 14690705     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/uog.3850     Document Type: Review

References (38)

1. Romero R, Espinoza J, Erez O, Hassan S. The role of cervical cerclage in obstetric practice: can the patient who could benefit from this procedure be identified? Am J Obstet Gynecol 2006; 194: 1-9.
2. Bishop EH. Pelvic scoring for elective induction. Obstet Gynecol 1964; 244: 266-268.
3. Bakke T. Cervical consistency in women of fertile age measured with a new mechanical instrument. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1974; 53: 293-302.
4. Cabrol D. Cervical distensibility changes in pregnancy, term and preterm labor. Semin Perinatol 1991; 15: 133-139.
5. Junqueira LC, Zugaib M, Montes GS, Toledo OM, Krisztan RM, Shigihara KM. Morphologic and histochemical evidence for the occurrence of collagenolysis and for the role of neutrophilic polymorphonuclear leukocytes during cervical dilation. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1980; 138: 273-281.
6. Sennstrom MB, Ekman G, Westergren-Thorsson G, Malmstrom A, Bystrom B, Endresen U, Mlambo N, Norman M, Stabi B, Brauner A. Human cervical ripening, an inflammatory process mediated by cytokines. Mol Hum Reprod 2000; 6: 375-381.
7. Winkler M, Rath W. Changes in the cervical extracellular matrix during pregnancy and parturition. J Perinat Med 1999; 27: 45-60.
8. Danforth D. The distribution and functional activity of the cervical musculature. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1954; 68: 1261-1271.
9. Petersen LK, Oxlund H, Uldbjerg N, Forman A. In vitro analysis of muscular contractile ability and passive biomechanical properties of uterine cervical samples from nonpregnant women. Obstet Gynecol 1991; 77: 772-776.
10. Aspden RM. The theory of fibre-reinforced composite materials applied to changes in the mechanical properties of the cervix during pregnancy. J Theor Biol 1988; 130: 213-221.
11. Aspden RM. Collagen organisation in the cervix and its relation to mechanical function. Coll Relat Res 1988; 8: 103-112.
12. Febvay S, Socrate S, House M. Biomechanical Modeling of Cervical Tissue: A Quantitative Investigation of Cervical Funneling. In Proceedings of IMECE'03. 2003 ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress & Expostion, Washington DC, 2003.
13. Feinberg RF, Kliman HJ, Lockwood CJ. Is oncofetal fibronectin a trophoblast glue for human implantation? Am J Pathol 1991; 138: 537-543.
14. Lockwood CJ, Senyei AE, Dische MR, Casal D, Shah KD, Thung SN, Jones L, Deligdisch L, Garite TJ. Fetal fibronectin in cervical and vaginal secretions as a predictor of preterm delivery. N Engl J Med 1991; 325: 669-674.
15. Mahendroo MS, Porter A, Russell DW, Word RA. The parturition defect in steroid 5-alpha-reductase type 1 knockout mice is due to impaired cervical ripening. Mol Endocrinol 1999; 13: 981-992.
16. Feltovich H, Ji H, Janowski JW, Delance NC, Moran CC, Chien EK. Effects of selective and nonselective PGE2 receptor agonists on cervical tensile strength and collagen organization and microstructure in the pregnant rat at term. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2005; 192: 753-760.
17. Oldenhof AD, Shynlova OP, Liu M, Langille BL, Lye SJ. Mitogen-activated protein kinases mediate stretch-induced c-fos mRNA expression in myometrial smooth muscle cells. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 2002; 283: C1530-C1539.
18. Holzapfel G. Nonlinear solid mechanics: A continuum approach for engineering, John Wiley & Sons: West Sussex, England; 2000.
19. Zilianti M, Azuaga A, Calderon F, Pages G, Mendoza G. Monitoring the effacement of the uterine cervix by transperineal sonography: a new perspective. J Ultrasound Med 1995; 14: 719-724.
20. House M, Paskaleva A, Myers K, Febvay S, Socrate S. The biomechanics of cervical funneling: the effect of stroma properties, anatomic geometry and pelvic forces on funnel formation. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2004; 191 (Suppl): S17.
21. Paskaleva A, Socrate S, House M. Biomechanics of Cervical Funneling: Case of Cervical Incompetence. In Proceedings of the Summer Bioengineering Conference. ASME Summer Bioengineering Conference, Vail CO, 2005.
22. House M, O'Callaghan M, Bahrami S, Chelmow D, Kini J, Wu D, Patz S, Bhadelia RA. Magnetic resonance imaging of the cervix during pregnancy: effect of gestational age and prior vaginal birth. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2005; 193: 1554-1560.
23. Daskalakis G, Papantoniou N, Mesogitis S, Antsaklis A. Management of cervical insufficiency and bulging fetal membranes. Obstet Gynecol 2006; 107: 221-226.
24. House M, Paskaleva AP, Myers K, Craigo S, Socrate S. The biomechanics of cerclage placement: the effect of cerclage position and stress relaxation on cervical stress. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2005; 193 (Suppl): S21.
25. Berghella V, Odibo AO, To MS, Rust OA, Althuisius SM. Cerclage for short cervix on ultrasonography: meta-analysis of trials using individual patient-level data. Obstet Gynecol 2005; 106: 181-189.
26. House M, Paskaleva AP, Myers K, Craigo S, Socrate S. The connection between uterine contractions and cervical dilation: the biomechanics of cervical deformation. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2005; 193 (Suppl): S55.
27. Iams JD, Johnson FF, Sonek J, Sachs L, Gebauer C, Samuels P. Cervical competence as a continuum: a study of ultrasonographic cervical length and obstetric performance. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1995; 172: 1097-1103.
28. Iams JD, Goldenberg RL, Meis PJ, Mercer BM, Moawad A, Das A, Thom E, McNellis D, Copper RL, Johnson F, Roberts JM. The length of the cervix and the risk of spontaneous premature delivery. N Engl J Med 1996; 334: 567-572.
29. Greenleaf JF, Fatemi M, Insana M. Selected methods for imaging elastic properties of biological tissues. Ann Rev Biomed Eng 2003; 5: 57-78.
30. Ophir J, Garra B, Kallel F, Konofagou E, Krouskop T, Righetti R, Varghese T. Elastographic imaging. Ultrasound Med Biol 2000; 26 (Suppl 1): S23-S29.
31. de Korte CL, van der Steen AF. Intravascular ultrasound elastography: an overview. Ultrasonics 2002; 40: 859-865.
32. Souchon R, Rouviere O, Gelet A, Detti V, Srinivasan S, Ophir J, Chapelon JY. Visualisation of HIFU lesions using elastography of the human prostate in vivo: preliminary results. Ultrasound Med Biol 2003; 29: 1007-1015.
33. Takeda T, Kassab G, Liu J, Puckett JL, Mittal RR, Mittal RK. A novel ultrasound technique to study the biomechanics of the human esophagus in vivo. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 2002; 282: G785-G793.
34. McFarlin BL, O'Brien WD Jr, Oelze ML, Zachary JF, White-Traut RC. Quantitative ultrasound assessment of the rat cervix. J Ultrasound Med 2006; 25: 1031-1040.
35. Uldbjerg N, Ekman G, Malmstrom A, Sporrong B, Ulmsten U, Wingerup L. Biochemical and morphological changes of human cervix after local application of prostaglandin E2 in pregnancy. Lancet 1981; 1: 267-268.
36. Theobald PW, Rath W, Kuhnle H, Kuhn W. Histological and electron-microscopic examinations of collagenous connective tissue of the non-pregnant cervix, the pregnant cervix, and the pregnant prostaglandin-treated cervix. Arch Gynecol 1982; 231: 241-245.
37. Fittkow CT, Maul H, Olson G, Martin E, MacKay LB, Saade GR, Garfield RE. Light-induced fluorescence of the human cervix decreases after prostaglandin application for induction of labor at term. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2005; 123: 62-66.
38. Mazza E, Nava A, Bauer M, Winter R, Bajka M, Holzapfel GA. Mechanical properties of the human uterine cervix: an in vivo study. Med Image Anal 2006; 10: 125-136.