SCOPUS 정보 검색 플랫폼

Journal of Medical Ethics

Volumn 32, Issue 11, 2006, Pages 662-664

Consistency in decision making by research ethics committees: A controlled comparison

(4) Angell, E a Sutton, A J a Windridge, K b Dixon Woods, M a

a UNIVERSITY OF LEICESTER (United Kingdom)

b Trent Research and Development Support Unit

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADVISORY COMMITTEE; ARTICLE; CLINICAL RESEARCH; CONFIDENCE INTERVAL; DECISION MAKING; MEDICAL RESEARCH; METHODOLOGY; RESEARCH ETHICS; SAMPLE SIZE; UNITED KINGDOM;

DECISION MAKING; ENGLAND; ETHICAL REVIEW; ETHICS COMMITTEES, RESEARCH; HUMANS; RESEARCH DESIGN;

EID: 33751248190 PISSN: 03066800 EISSN: None Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1136/jme.2005.014159 Document Type: Article

Times cited : (39)

References (10)

1
- 0011559063
- Central Office for Research Ethics Committees. London: Department of Health, (accessed Jul 2005)
- Central Office for Research Ethics Committees. Governance arrangements for research ethics committees (GAfREC). London: Department of Health, 2001, http://www.dh.gov.uk/assetRoot/04/05/86/09/04058609.pdf (accessed Jul 2005).
- (2001) Governance Arrangements for Research Ethics Committees (GAfREC)

2
- 33751239812
- Standard operating procedures for research ethics committees
- Central Office for Research Ethics Committees. (accessed Jul)
- Central Office for Research Ethics Committees. Standard operating procedures for research ethics committees. http://www.corec.org.uk/recs/ guidance/docs/SOPs.doc (accessed Jul 2005).
- (2005)

3
- 33751203900
- The European Parliament and the Council of the European Union. (accessed Jul 2005) L121/34)
- The European Parliament and the Council of the European Union. http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/pri/en/oj/dat/2001/1_121/ 1_12120010501en0034O044.pdf (accessed Jul 2005) Official J Eur Communities. 2001: L121/34).
- (2001) Official J Eur Communities

4
- 0028963284
- Are ethics committees reliable?
- Hotopf M, Wesseley S, Noah A. Are ethics committees reliable? J R Soc Med 1995;88:31-33.
- (1995) J R Soc Med , vol.88 , pp. 31-33
- Hotopf, M.¹ Wesseley, S.² Noah, A.³

5
- 0034728801
- Responses of local research ethics committees to a study with approval from a multicentre research ethics committee
- Lux AL, Edwards SW, Osborne JP. Responses of local research ethics committees to a study with approval from a multicentre research ethics committee. BMJ 2000;320:1182-3.
- (2000) BMJ , vol.320 , pp. 1182-1183
- Lux, A.L.¹ Edwards, S.W.² Osborne, J.P.³

6
- 0037385357
- Variation in obtaining local ethical approval for participation in a multi-centre study
- Maskell NA, Jones EL, Davies PJO. Variation in obtaining local ethical approval for participation in a multi-centre study. Q J Med 2003;96:305-7.
- (2003) Q J Med , vol.96 , pp. 305-307
- Maskell, N.A.¹ Jones, E.L.² Davies, P.J.O.³

7
- 14144254552
- The ethics and governance of medical research: What does regulation have to do with morality?
- Ashcroft RE. The ethics and governance of medical research: what does regulation have to do with morality? New Rev Bioethics 2003;1:41-58.
- (2003) New Rev Bioethics , vol.1 , pp. 41-58
- Ashcroft, R.E.¹

8
- 85047277976
- The ethics of research ethics committees
- Nicholl J. The ethics of research ethics committees. BMJ 2000;320:1217.
- (2000) BMJ , vol.320 , pp. 1217
- Nicholl, J.¹

9
- 0003767164
- Department of Health. 2nd edn. London: Department of Health
- Department of Health. Research governance for health and social care, 2nd edn. London: Department of Health, 2005.
- (2005) Research Governance for Health and Social Care

10
- 4544343304
- Research ethics committees: Differences and moral judgement
- Edwards SJL, Ashcroft R, Kirchin S. Research ethics committees: differences and moral judgement. Bioethics 2004;18:408-27.
- (2004) Bioethics , vol.18 , pp. 408-427
- Edwards, S.J.L.¹ Ashcroft, R.² Kirchin, S.³

* 이 정보는 Elsevier사의 SCOPUS DB에서 KISTI가 분석하여 추출한 것입니다.