An explicit algebraic Reynolds stress model in turbulence

International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids

Volumn 52, Issue 10, 2006, Pages 1135-1157

  Rahman, Mizanur M ^a   Siikonen, T ^a  

^a AALTO UNIVERSITY   (Finland)

Author keywords

Flow separation and reattachment; Production to dissipation ratio; Realizability; Turbulence anisotropy

Indexed keywords

ANISOTROPY; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; REYNOLDS NUMBER; SHEAR FLOW; VORTEX FLOW;

ALGEBRAIC REYNOLD STRESS MODEL; DIRECT NUMERICAL SIMULATION; FLOW SEPARATION AND REATTACHMENT; TURBULENCE ANISOTROPY;

TURBULENCE;

ANISOTROPY; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; REYNOLDS NUMBER; SHEAR FLOW; TURBULENCE; VORTEX FLOW;

EID: 33751238832     PISSN: 02712091     EISSN: 10970363     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/fld.1222     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Rodi W. A new algebraic relation for calculating the Reynolds stresses. Zeitschrift fur Angewanate Mathematik und Mechanik 1976; 56:T219-T221.
2. Pope SB. A more general effective viscosity hypothesis. Journal of Fluid Mechanics 1975; 72:331-340.
3. Gatski TB, Speziale CG. On the explicit algebraic stress models for complex turbulent flow. Journal of Fluid Mechanics 1993; 254:59-78.
4. Lumley JL. Computational modelling of turbulent flows. Advances in Applied Mechanics 1978; 18:124-176.
5. Abid R, Rumsey C, Gatski TB. Prediction of nonequilibrium turbulent flows with explicit algebraic stress models. AIAA Journal 1995; 33:2026-2031.
6. Girimaji SS. Fully explicit and self-consistent algebraic Reynolds stress model. Theoretical and Computational Fluid Dynamics 1996; 8:387-402.
7. Rumsey CL, Gatski TB, Morrison JH. Turbulence model predictions of strongly curved flow in a U-duct. AIAA Journal 2000; 38:1394-1402.
8. Girimaji SS. A Galilean invariant explicit algebraic Reynolds stress model for turbulent curved flows. Physics of Fluids 1997; 9:1067-1077.
9. So RMC, Sarkar A, Gerodimos G, Zhang J. A dissipation rate equation for low-Reynolds number and near-wall turbulence. Theoretical and Computational Fluid Dynamics 1997; 9:47-63.
10. Rahman MM, Siikonen T. Improved low-Reynolds-number κ-ε̃ model. AIAA Journal 2000; 38:1298-1300.
11. Jones WP, Launder BE. The calculation of low-Reynolds number phenomena with a two-equation model of turbulence. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer 1973; 16:1119-1130.
12. Craft TJ, Launder BE, Suga K. Extending the applicability of eddy-viscosity model through the use of deformation invariant and non-linear elements. Proceedings of the Fifth International Symposium on Refined Flow Modelling and Turbulence Measurements 1993; 125.
13. Craft TJ, Launder BE, Suga K. Development and application of a cubic eddy viscosity model of turbulence. International Journal of Heat and Fluid Flow 1996; 17:108-115.
14. Rung T, Thiele F, Fu S. On the realizability of nonlinear stress-strain relationships for Reynolds stress closures. Flow, Turbulence and Combustion 1999; 60:333-359.
15. Shih T-H, Zhu J, Lumley JL. A new Reynolds stress algebraic equation model. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 1995; 125:287-302.
16. Jongen T, Gatski TB. A new approach to characterizing the equilibrium states of the Reynolds stress anisotropy in homogeneous turbulence. Theoretical and Computational Fluid Dynamics 1998; 11:31-47.
17. Kim J. Personal communication, 1990.
18. Tavoularis S, Corrsin A. Experiments in nearly homogeneous turbulent shear flow with a uniform mean temperature gradient. Journal of Fluid Mechanics Part I 1981; 104:311-347.
19. Abid R, Speziale CG. Predicting equilibrium states with Reynolds stress closures in channel flow and homogeneous shear flow. Physics of Fluids A 1997; 5:1776-1782.
20. Kim J, Moin P, Moser R. Turbulence statistics in fully developed channel flow at low Reynolds number. Journal of Fluid Mechanics 1987; 177:133-166.
21. Lee MJ, Kim J, Moin P. Structure of turbulence at high shear rate. Journal of Fluid Mechanics 1990; 216:561-583.
22. Rogers MM, Moin P. The structure of the vorticity field in homogeneous turbulent flows. Journal of Fluid Mechanics 1987; 176:33-66.
23. Cazalbou JB, Bradshaw P. Turbulent transport in wall bounded flows. Evaluation of model coefficients using direct numerical simulation. Physics of Fluids 1993; 5:3233-3239.
24. Rahman MM, Siikonen T. Near-wall turbulence modelling with enhanced dissipation. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids 2003; 42:979-997.
25. Rahman MM, Rautaheimo P, Siikonen T. Modifications for an explicit algebraic stress model. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids 2001; 35:221-245.
26. Patel VC, Rodi W, Scheuerer G. Turbulence models for near-wall and low Reynolds number flow: a review. AIAA Journal 1985; 23:1308-1319.
27. Mansour NN, Kim J, Moin P. Reynolds-stress and dissipation-rate budgets in a turbulent channel flow. Journal of Fluid Mechanics 1988; 194:15-44.
28. Mansour NN, Kim J, Moin P. Near-wall κ-ε turbulence modelling. AIAA Journal 1989; 27:1068-1073.
29. Durbin PA, Speziale CG. Local anisotropy in strained at high Reynolds numbers. Journal of Fluids Engineering 1991; 113:707-709.
30. Durbin PA. A Reynolds-stress model for near-wall turbulence. Journal of Fluid Mechanics 1993; 249:465-498.
31. Ahn JW, Park TS, Sung HJ. Application of a near-wall turbulence model to the flows over a step with inclined wall. International Journal of Heat and Fluid Flow 1997; 18:209-217.
32. Yoshizawa A. Statistical modelling of a transport equation for the kinetic energy dissipation rate. Physics of Fluids A 1987; 30:628-631.
33. Yap CR. Turbulent heat and momentum transfer in recirculating and impinging flows. Ph.D. Thesis, Faculty of Technology, University of Manchester, 1987.
34. Abe K, Kondoh T, Nagano Y. On Reynolds-stress expressions and near-wall scaling parameters for predicting wall and homogeneous turbulent shear flows. International Journal of Heat and Fluid Flow 1997; 18:266-282.
35. Rahman MM, Rautaheimo P, Siikonen T. Numerical study of turbulent heat transfer from a confined impinging jet using a pseudo-compressibility method. In Second International Symposium on Turbulence, Heat and Mass Transfer, Delft, The Netherlands, 1997; 511-520.
36. Roe PL. Approximate Riemann solvers, parameter vectors, and difference schemes. Journal of Computational Physics 1981; 43:357-372.
37. Lombard C, Bardina J, Venkatapathy E, Oliger J. Multi-dimensional formulation of CSCM - an upwind flux difference eigenvector split method for the compressible Navier-Stokes equations. In Sixth AIAA Computational Fluid Dynamics Conference, AIAA Paper 83-1895-CP, 1983; 649-664.
38. Jameson A, Yoon S. Multigrid solution of the Euler equations using implicit schemes. AIAA Journal 1986; 24:1737-1743.
39. Rahman MM, Siikonen T. An artificial compressibility method for incompressible flows. Numerical Heat Transfer, Part B 2001; 40:391-409.
40. Coupland J. Flat plate transitional boundary layers. ERCOFTAC Fluid Dynamics Database (http://ercoftac.mech.surrey.ac.uk/), 1990.
41. Chen WL, Lien FS, Leschziner MA. Nonlinear eddy viscosity modelling of transitional boundary layers pertinent to turbomachine aerodynamics. International Journal of Heat and Fluid Flow 1998; 19:297-306.
42. Savill AM. Some recent progress in the turbulence modelling of by-pass transition. In Near- Wall Turbulent Flows, So RMC, Speziale CG, Launder BE (eds). Elsevier: Amsterdam, 1993; 829-848.
43. Driver DM, Seegmiller HL. Features of a reattaching turbulent shear layer in divergent channel flow. AIAA Journal 1985; 23:163-171.
44. Buice C, Eaton JK. Experimental investigation of flow through an asymmetric plane diffuser. Report TSD-107, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Thermoscience Division, Stanford University, California, CA, 1997.